From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Cc: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>,
Tobias Schaffner <tobias.schaffner@siemens.com>,
Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/15] tools/rv: Copy stripped bpf_atomic.h from libarena
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 20:43:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261010204327.0656cde7@226.227.38.69.naturalwireless.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76753c2dd66792ec6eb94d00741e61366df426cb.camel@redhat.com>
Please keep both until you know the BPF side can do everything you need.
On Fri, 09 Oct 2026 12:09:42 +0200
Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com> wrote:
> There's a common belief considering BPF a prototyping playground, where "real"
> things should eventually end up in the kernel.
> Now, I don't agree with it (look at the many sched_ext policies used in
> production), but I'd want to assess if dropping kernel support could drive users
> away (e.g. industry/automotive which keeps popping out) and understand the
> various not purely technical reasons.
Where do you plan on storing the repository of BPF programs?
One issue I have with sched_ext is that it did exactly what many people
were worried about. There's a lot of schedulers out there without much
collaboration. It's the "copy one close to what I want and tweak it".
When I left Google, I heard there was 20 or so sched_ext schedulers
doing various things for various projects.
One of my main motivations for scheduler governors.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 15:20 [PATCH v2 00/15] rv: Add support for BPF monitors Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] sched: Add task enqueue/dequeue trace points Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-01 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-02 7:09 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-02 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-02 11:55 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-02 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-02 19:40 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-04 7:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-10-12 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-04 7:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-10-12 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-02 0:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] tools/rv: Skip empty pid error in selftest if command failed Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-02 0:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] rv: Refactor da_trace() functions to get strings internally Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] rv: Cast result of model_get_*_name() Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] tools/rv: Move argument parsing from in_kernel to utils Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-02 0:25 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] tools/build: Add a feature test for bpftool-btf Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] tools/rv: Implement BPF monitor discovery and listing Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-02 0:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] tools/rv: Implement BPF monitor loading and tracing Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-02 0:43 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] tools/rv: Copy stripped bpf_atomic.h from libarena Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-02 0:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-07 12:59 ` Nam Cao
2026-10-08 9:00 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-08 11:16 ` Nam Cao
2026-10-09 10:09 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-11 0:43 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2026-10-12 7:43 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] tools/rv: Add BPF monitors Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-02 0:43 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-06 13:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-08 9:54 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] tools/rv: Define CONFIG_X86_64 statically for " Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] tools/rv: Add reactors support to " Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-02 0:43 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] verification/rvgen: Add support for " Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-02 0:25 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] tools/rv: Add selftest for rv bpf monitors Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-02 0:43 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-01 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] verification/rvgen: Add selftest for rvgen -b Gabriele Monaco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261010204327.0656cde7@226.227.38.69.naturalwireless.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=tobias.schaffner@siemens.com \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
--cc=wen.yang@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®