Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] Add basic clocks and resets for JHB100 SoC

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1207 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 12:21:47PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> > The JHB100 SoC includes CRG (Clock and Reset Generator) for multiple
> > subsystems:
> 
> Nothing really forces you to send them all together.
> 
> In the future, could you try to send one CRG driver at a time ?
> 
> It is fine to send big RFC to give context but after that, if you
> can make you series smaller, it is generally a good idea to do so.
> 
> This helps us iterate on the series faster and then you can fold our
> feedback in following series (instead of repeating the same comments
> on multiple instances of the same thing) Thanks.
> 

> Also your series does not apply on clk-next or -rc1 and no pre-requisite
> are mentioned in this cover letter. Consider using b4 to point out
> your pre-requisite if any

The dep should be the PR I sent to Brian, but I suspect what's happened
here is that the MAINTAINERS parts of those patches (which I had dropped
because they were all conflicting with my tree) didn't get reabsorbed
into this series. Very annoying for review of course, even if it's a
non-functional conflict. Of course rebase on top of clk-next would've
highlighted that to the submitter!

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]