From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Ananth Narayan <ananth.narayan@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/amd/lbr: Limit branch snapshots to valid entries
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:30:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261012153014.GU4121339@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007181002.4005262-1-sandipan.das@amd.com>
On Wed, Oct 07, 2026 at 11:40:02PM +0530, Sandipan Das wrote:
> The branch snapshot callback used by bpf_get_branch_snapshot() copies
> up to x86_pmu.lbr_nr entries from cpuc->lbr_entries[], even when the
> last LBR read kept fewer branches. The entries past lbr_stack.nr are
> invalid, but they end up reaching BPF programs.
>
> Limit copying to lbr_stack.nr entries and also reset lbr_stack.nr when
> amd_pmu_lbr_read() skips reading the registers, so that a stale count
> is never reused.
>
> Fixes: a4d18112e531 ("perf/x86/amd: Support capturing LBR from software events")
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/sashiko-outbox-163130@kernel.org/
> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/amd/core.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c
> index 49b6b8fce566..bf631f60757c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c
> @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ static int amd_pmu_v2_snapshot_branch_stack(struct perf_branch_entry *entries, u
> cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
>
> amd_pmu_lbr_read();
> - cnt = min(cnt, x86_pmu.lbr_nr);
> + cnt = min(cnt, cpuc->lbr_stack.nr);
> memcpy(entries, cpuc->lbr_entries, sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry) * cnt);
>
> amd_pmu_v2_enable_all(0);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
> index 1e1b2f08cb51..a00d3850c4a8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
> @@ -165,8 +165,10 @@ void amd_pmu_lbr_read(void)
> struct branch_entry entry;
> int out = 0, idx, i;
>
> - if (!cpuc->lbr_users)
> + if (!cpuc->lbr_users) {
> + cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = 0;
> return;
> + }
>
> for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) {
> entry.from.full = amd_pmu_lbr_get_from(i);
You now seem to deviate from what the Intel code does. Please clarify.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-07 18:10 Sandipan Das
2026-10-12 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-10-13 6:44 ` Sandipan Das
2026-10-13 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-13 12:53 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261012153014.GU4121339@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®