mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
To: "Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	dakr@kernel.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] dma-buf/dma-fence: Mark two callbacks as deprecated
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:19:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261012171939.390365-2-phasta@kernel.org> (raw)

dma_fence's backend_ops functions ops->wait() and ops->release() are
problematic because they prevent fence producers from unloading.
Moreover, they can easily be implemented through simpler means more
aligned with the dma_fence contract.

Since the declared goal of dma_fence is to move towards an
implementation that supports driver-unload in all circumstances, we must
prevent more parties from implementing those callbacks.

Deprecate ops->release() and ops->wait() and document what users should
do instead.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
  - Drop confusing sentence (Christian).
---
 include/linux/dma-fence.h | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
index dd07d128adc3..388c07d11e70 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
@@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ struct dma_fence_ops {
 	/**
 	 * @wait:
 	 *
+	 * DEPRECATED!
+	 *
 	 * Custom wait implementation, defaults to dma_fence_default_wait() if
 	 * not set.
 	 *
@@ -243,6 +245,8 @@ struct dma_fence_ops {
 	/**
 	 * @release:
 	 *
+	 * DEPRECATED!
+	 *
 	 * Called on destruction of fence to release additional resources.
 	 * Can be called from irq context.  This callback is optional. If it is
 	 * NULL, then dma_fence_free() is instead called as the default
@@ -254,6 +258,12 @@ struct dma_fence_ops {
 	 *
 	 * If the callback is implemented the memory backing the dma_fence
 	 * object must be freed RCU safe.
+	 *
+	 * Deprecated because it prevents the producer of a fence from
+	 * unloading. No new users must be implemented. Parties with a
+	 * hypothetical need for this callback can instead simply and directly
+	 * perform their custom release operations one RCU grace period after
+	 * they have signaled the fence.
 	 */
 	void (*release)(struct dma_fence *fence);
 

base-commit: 3e32932d3626d0279f9b3531bd648f8c0a16cb08
-- 
2.55.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-12 17:19 Philipp Stanner [this message]
2026-10-13  6:50 ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261012171939.390365-2-phasta@kernel.org \
    --to=phasta@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®