From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
To: "Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
dakr@kernel.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] dma-buf/dma-fence: Mark two callbacks as deprecated
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:19:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261012171939.390365-2-phasta@kernel.org> (raw)
dma_fence's backend_ops functions ops->wait() and ops->release() are
problematic because they prevent fence producers from unloading.
Moreover, they can easily be implemented through simpler means more
aligned with the dma_fence contract.
Since the declared goal of dma_fence is to move towards an
implementation that supports driver-unload in all circumstances, we must
prevent more parties from implementing those callbacks.
Deprecate ops->release() and ops->wait() and document what users should
do instead.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Drop confusing sentence (Christian).
---
include/linux/dma-fence.h | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
index dd07d128adc3..388c07d11e70 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
@@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ struct dma_fence_ops {
/**
* @wait:
*
+ * DEPRECATED!
+ *
* Custom wait implementation, defaults to dma_fence_default_wait() if
* not set.
*
@@ -243,6 +245,8 @@ struct dma_fence_ops {
/**
* @release:
*
+ * DEPRECATED!
+ *
* Called on destruction of fence to release additional resources.
* Can be called from irq context. This callback is optional. If it is
* NULL, then dma_fence_free() is instead called as the default
@@ -254,6 +258,12 @@ struct dma_fence_ops {
*
* If the callback is implemented the memory backing the dma_fence
* object must be freed RCU safe.
+ *
+ * Deprecated because it prevents the producer of a fence from
+ * unloading. No new users must be implemented. Parties with a
+ * hypothetical need for this callback can instead simply and directly
+ * perform their custom release operations one RCU grace period after
+ * they have signaled the fence.
*/
void (*release)(struct dma_fence *fence);
base-commit: 3e32932d3626d0279f9b3531bd648f8c0a16cb08
--
2.55.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 17:19 Philipp Stanner [this message]
2026-10-13 6:50 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261012171939.390365-2-phasta@kernel.org \
--to=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®