Re: [PATCH v2] dma-buf/dma-fence: Mark two callbacks as deprecated

["Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>]

On 10/12/26 19:19, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> dma_fence's backend_ops functions ops->wait() and ops->release() are
> problematic because they prevent fence producers from unloading.
> Moreover, they can easily be implemented through simpler means more
> aligned with the dma_fence contract.
> 
> Since the declared goal of dma_fence is to move towards an
> implementation that supports driver-unload in all circumstances, we must
> prevent more parties from implementing those callbacks.
> 
> Deprecate ops->release() and ops->wait() and document what users should
> do instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

Going to push it to drm-misc-next later today.

> ---
> Changes in v2:
>   - Drop confusing sentence (Christian).
> ---
>  include/linux/dma-fence.h | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> index dd07d128adc3..388c07d11e70 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> @@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ struct dma_fence_ops {
>  	/**
>  	 * @wait:
>  	 *
> +	 * DEPRECATED!
> +	 *
>  	 * Custom wait implementation, defaults to dma_fence_default_wait() if
>  	 * not set.
>  	 *
> @@ -243,6 +245,8 @@ struct dma_fence_ops {
>  	/**
>  	 * @release:
>  	 *
> +	 * DEPRECATED!
> +	 *
>  	 * Called on destruction of fence to release additional resources.
>  	 * Can be called from irq context.  This callback is optional. If it is
>  	 * NULL, then dma_fence_free() is instead called as the default
> @@ -254,6 +258,12 @@ struct dma_fence_ops {
>  	 *
>  	 * If the callback is implemented the memory backing the dma_fence
>  	 * object must be freed RCU safe.
> +	 *
> +	 * Deprecated because it prevents the producer of a fence from
> +	 * unloading. No new users must be implemented. Parties with a
> +	 * hypothetical need for this callback can instead simply and directly
> +	 * perform their custom release operations one RCU grace period after
> +	 * they have signaled the fence.
>  	 */
>  	void (*release)(struct dma_fence *fence);
>  
> 
> base-commit: 3e32932d3626d0279f9b3531bd648f8c0a16cb08