Re: [PATCH 1/2] vt: Use boolean as parameter to do_blank_screen() and do_unblank_screen()

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 11:27:38AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> The parameters to do_blank_screen() and do_unblank_screen() signal
> whether the call is part of a switch between text and graphics mode.
> Convert to boolean. No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/vt/vt.c              | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c        | 12 ++++++------
>  drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon.c |  4 ++--
>  include/linux/vt_kern.h          |  5 +++--
>  4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> index 57edf37495a8..9e7b4419b422 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> @@ -3374,7 +3374,7 @@ static void console_callback(struct work_struct *ignored)
>  		scrollback_delta = 0;
>  	}
>  	if (blank_timer_expired) {
> -		do_blank_screen(0);
> +		do_blank_screen(false);

Same type of comment here, this bool doesn't really tell what is
happening at all (not your fault, 0/1 doesn't either.)

I'm all for this patch but shouldn't this be fixed up to be 2 different
named functions entirely?

thanks,

greg k-h