* [PATCH v1] sched/cputime: Preserve iowait accounting across waking interrupts in dyntick-idle
@ 2026-10-14 1:52 Wei Gao
2026-10-14 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-14 14:14 ` Christian Loehle
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wei Gao @ 2026-10-14 1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, K Prateek Nayak, Jens Axboe,
io-uring, linux-kernel, Wei Gao
In liburing's test suite, the test/iowait.t test case intermittently fails
with:
iowait diff too small: 48
test 1 failed
on tickless systems where IRQ time accounting (CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING)
is not enabled.
Commit 7198e3927a14 ("sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully")
optimized dyntick-idle cputime accounting by avoiding pausing idle
accounting on IRQ entry when IRQ time accounting is disabled.
However, this causes iowait time to be erroneously accounted as
CPUTIME_IDLE if the task waiting for I/O is woken up inside the interrupt
handler (such as the 1-second timeout hrtimer in liburing's test/iowait.t):
1. In test/iowait.t, a read request is submitted on an empty pipe and
io_uring_wait_cqe_timeout() is called with a 1-second timeout. Because
current->in_iowait is set, rq->nr_iowait on the CPU is incremented
to 1. When the CPU enters tickless idle, the periodic scheduler tick
is stopped.
2. When the 1-second timeout expires, the hrtimer interrupt fires.
Because irqtime is disabled, kcpustat_irq_enter() does not pause idle
accounting.
3. Inside the interrupt handler, io_cqring_timer_wakeup() calls
wake_up_process(). In ttwu_do_activate(), waking up the task immediately
decrements rq->nr_iowait from 1 to 0 before the CPU has exited idle.
4. When the CPU returns from the interrupt and calls tick_nohz_idle_exit()
-> kcpustat_idle_stop() to settle the elapsed tickless idle duration,
it checks:
iowait = nr_iowait_cpu(smp_processor_id()) > 0;
Because rq->nr_iowait was already decremented by ttwu_do_activate(),
this evaluates to false. As a result, the entire 1-second idle duration
spent waiting for I/O is credited to CPUTIME_IDLE instead of
CPUTIME_IOWAIT, causing diff < 50 and failing the test.
Fix this by checking nr_iowait_cpu() in kcpustat_irq_enter(). If the CPU is
currently in iowait, pause and settle the elapsed time to CPUTIME_IOWAIT
before the interrupt handler runs. On kcpustat_irq_exit(), resume
accounting if it was paused.
Fixes: 7198e3927a14 ("sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully")
Signed-off-by: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
---
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 06bddaa738e5..e8b56433c61c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -496,7 +496,8 @@ void kcpustat_irq_enter(u64 now)
struct kernel_cpustat *kc = kcpustat_this_cpu;
if (!vtime_generic_enabled_this_cpu() &&
- (irqtime_enabled() || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu()))
+ (irqtime_enabled() || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu() ||
+ nr_iowait_cpu(smp_processor_id()) > 0))
kcpustat_idle_stop(kc, now);
}
@@ -510,9 +511,13 @@ void kcpustat_irq_exit(u64 now)
* need to pause nohz accounting. Resume nohz accounting as long
* as the irqtime config is enabled to handle case where irqtime
* accounting got runtime disabled in the middle of an IRQ.
+ *
+ * Also resume accounting if it was paused on IRQ enter due to
+ * iowait.
*/
if (!vtime_generic_enabled_this_cpu() &&
- (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING) || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu()))
+ (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING) || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu() ||
+ !kc->idle_elapse))
kcpustat_idle_start(kc, now);
}
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] sched/cputime: Preserve iowait accounting across waking interrupts in dyntick-idle
2026-10-14 1:52 [PATCH v1] sched/cputime: Preserve iowait accounting across waking interrupts in dyntick-idle Wei Gao
@ 2026-10-14 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-14 13:17 ` Christian Loehle
2026-10-14 14:14 ` Christian Loehle
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2026-10-14 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Gao
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker, Ingo Molnar, Juri Lelli, Vincent Guittot,
Thomas Gleixner, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, K Prateek Nayak, Jens Axboe,
io-uring, linux-kernel
On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 01:52:58AM +0000, Wei Gao wrote:
> In liburing's test suite, the test/iowait.t test case intermittently fails
> with:
> iowait diff too small: 48
> test 1 failed
> on tickless systems where IRQ time accounting (CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING)
> is not enabled.
>
> Commit 7198e3927a14 ("sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully")
> optimized dyntick-idle cputime accounting by avoiding pausing idle
> accounting on IRQ entry when IRQ time accounting is disabled.
>
> However, this causes iowait time to be erroneously accounted as
> CPUTIME_IDLE if the task waiting for I/O is woken up inside the interrupt
> handler (such as the 1-second timeout hrtimer in liburing's test/iowait.t):
>
> 1. In test/iowait.t, a read request is submitted on an empty pipe and
> io_uring_wait_cqe_timeout() is called with a 1-second timeout. Because
> current->in_iowait is set, rq->nr_iowait on the CPU is incremented
> to 1. When the CPU enters tickless idle, the periodic scheduler tick
> is stopped.
> 2. When the 1-second timeout expires, the hrtimer interrupt fires.
> Because irqtime is disabled, kcpustat_irq_enter() does not pause idle
> accounting.
> 3. Inside the interrupt handler, io_cqring_timer_wakeup() calls
> wake_up_process(). In ttwu_do_activate(), waking up the task immediately
> decrements rq->nr_iowait from 1 to 0 before the CPU has exited idle.
> 4. When the CPU returns from the interrupt and calls tick_nohz_idle_exit()
> -> kcpustat_idle_stop() to settle the elapsed tickless idle duration,
> it checks:
> iowait = nr_iowait_cpu(smp_processor_id()) > 0;
> Because rq->nr_iowait was already decremented by ttwu_do_activate(),
> this evaluates to false. As a result, the entire 1-second idle duration
> spent waiting for I/O is credited to CPUTIME_IDLE instead of
> CPUTIME_IOWAIT, causing diff < 50 and failing the test.
>
> Fix this by checking nr_iowait_cpu() in kcpustat_irq_enter(). If the CPU is
> currently in iowait, pause and settle the elapsed time to CPUTIME_IOWAIT
> before the interrupt handler runs. On kcpustat_irq_exit(), resume
> accounting if it was paused.
Using nr_iowait_cpu() is fundamentally never a fix. It is rolling a dice
and liking random numbers. See the comment that goes with that function.
> Fixes: 7198e3927a14 ("sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/cputime.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> index 06bddaa738e5..e8b56433c61c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -496,7 +496,8 @@ void kcpustat_irq_enter(u64 now)
> struct kernel_cpustat *kc = kcpustat_this_cpu;
>
> if (!vtime_generic_enabled_this_cpu() &&
> - (irqtime_enabled() || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu()))
> + (irqtime_enabled() || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu() ||
> + nr_iowait_cpu(smp_processor_id()) > 0))
> kcpustat_idle_stop(kc, now);
> }
>
> @@ -510,9 +511,13 @@ void kcpustat_irq_exit(u64 now)
> * need to pause nohz accounting. Resume nohz accounting as long
> * as the irqtime config is enabled to handle case where irqtime
> * accounting got runtime disabled in the middle of an IRQ.
> + *
> + * Also resume accounting if it was paused on IRQ enter due to
> + * iowait.
> */
> if (!vtime_generic_enabled_this_cpu() &&
> - (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING) || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu()))
> + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING) || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu() ||
> + !kc->idle_elapse))
> kcpustat_idle_start(kc, now);
> }
>
> --
> 2.55.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] sched/cputime: Preserve iowait accounting across waking interrupts in dyntick-idle
2026-10-14 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2026-10-14 13:17 ` Christian Loehle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christian Loehle @ 2026-10-14 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra, Wei Gao
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker, Ingo Molnar, Juri Lelli, Vincent Guittot,
Thomas Gleixner, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, K Prateek Nayak, Jens Axboe,
io-uring, linux-kernel
On 10/14/26 13:49, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 01:52:58AM +0000, Wei Gao wrote:
>> In liburing's test suite, the test/iowait.t test case intermittently fails
>> with:
>> iowait diff too small: 48
>> test 1 failed
>> on tickless systems where IRQ time accounting (CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING)
>> is not enabled.
>>
>> Commit 7198e3927a14 ("sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully")
>> optimized dyntick-idle cputime accounting by avoiding pausing idle
>> accounting on IRQ entry when IRQ time accounting is disabled.
>>
>> However, this causes iowait time to be erroneously accounted as
>> CPUTIME_IDLE if the task waiting for I/O is woken up inside the interrupt
>> handler (such as the 1-second timeout hrtimer in liburing's test/iowait.t):
>>
>> 1. In test/iowait.t, a read request is submitted on an empty pipe and
>> io_uring_wait_cqe_timeout() is called with a 1-second timeout. Because
>> current->in_iowait is set, rq->nr_iowait on the CPU is incremented
>> to 1. When the CPU enters tickless idle, the periodic scheduler tick
>> is stopped.
>> 2. When the 1-second timeout expires, the hrtimer interrupt fires.
>> Because irqtime is disabled, kcpustat_irq_enter() does not pause idle
>> accounting.
>> 3. Inside the interrupt handler, io_cqring_timer_wakeup() calls
>> wake_up_process(). In ttwu_do_activate(), waking up the task immediately
>> decrements rq->nr_iowait from 1 to 0 before the CPU has exited idle.
>> 4. When the CPU returns from the interrupt and calls tick_nohz_idle_exit()
>> -> kcpustat_idle_stop() to settle the elapsed tickless idle duration,
>> it checks:
>> iowait = nr_iowait_cpu(smp_processor_id()) > 0;
>> Because rq->nr_iowait was already decremented by ttwu_do_activate(),
>> this evaluates to false. As a result, the entire 1-second idle duration
>> spent waiting for I/O is credited to CPUTIME_IDLE instead of
>> CPUTIME_IOWAIT, causing diff < 50 and failing the test.
>>
>> Fix this by checking nr_iowait_cpu() in kcpustat_irq_enter(). If the CPU is
>> currently in iowait, pause and settle the elapsed time to CPUTIME_IOWAIT
>> before the interrupt handler runs. On kcpustat_irq_exit(), resume
>> accounting if it was paused.
>
> Using nr_iowait_cpu() is fundamentally never a fix. It is rolling a dice
> and liking random numbers. See the comment that goes with that function.
>
Speaking of, that comment is stale, menu doesn't use that heuristic anymore.
FWIW the remaining aggregated nr_iowait users seem to be accounting/reporting.
(cpufreq still uses it, but it comes directly from p->in_iowait).
Given they are exported (/proc/stat procs_blocked and something in s390) I don't
see how we can remove this entirely but at least nr_iowait_cpu() as opposed
to cpu_has_iowait() could be refactored. The issues are obviously the same still.
I'll send a patch.
Peter, if you see a path to ever retire iowait (or at least the CPU iowait for now),
I'm more than happy to sink some time into it...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] sched/cputime: Preserve iowait accounting across waking interrupts in dyntick-idle
2026-10-14 1:52 [PATCH v1] sched/cputime: Preserve iowait accounting across waking interrupts in dyntick-idle Wei Gao
2026-10-14 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2026-10-14 14:14 ` Christian Loehle
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christian Loehle @ 2026-10-14 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Gao, Frederic Weisbecker, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar,
Juri Lelli, Vincent Guittot
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, K Prateek Nayak, Jens Axboe,
io-uring, linux-kernel
On 10/14/26 02:52, Wei Gao wrote:
> In liburing's test suite, the test/iowait.t test case intermittently fails
> with:
> iowait diff too small: 48
> test 1 failed
> on tickless systems where IRQ time accounting (CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING)
> is not enabled.
>
> Commit 7198e3927a14 ("sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully")
> optimized dyntick-idle cputime accounting by avoiding pausing idle
> accounting on IRQ entry when IRQ time accounting is disabled.
>
> However, this causes iowait time to be erroneously accounted as
> CPUTIME_IDLE if the task waiting for I/O is woken up inside the interrupt
> handler (such as the 1-second timeout hrtimer in liburing's test/iowait.t):
>
> 1. In test/iowait.t, a read request is submitted on an empty pipe and
> io_uring_wait_cqe_timeout() is called with a 1-second timeout. Because
> current->in_iowait is set, rq->nr_iowait on the CPU is incremented
> to 1. When the CPU enters tickless idle, the periodic scheduler tick
> is stopped.
> 2. When the 1-second timeout expires, the hrtimer interrupt fires.
> Because irqtime is disabled, kcpustat_irq_enter() does not pause idle
> accounting.
> 3. Inside the interrupt handler, io_cqring_timer_wakeup() calls
> wake_up_process(). In ttwu_do_activate(), waking up the task immediately
> decrements rq->nr_iowait from 1 to 0 before the CPU has exited idle.
> 4. When the CPU returns from the interrupt and calls tick_nohz_idle_exit()
> -> kcpustat_idle_stop() to settle the elapsed tickless idle duration,
> it checks:
> iowait = nr_iowait_cpu(smp_processor_id()) > 0;
> Because rq->nr_iowait was already decremented by ttwu_do_activate(),
> this evaluates to false. As a result, the entire 1-second idle duration
> spent waiting for I/O is credited to CPUTIME_IDLE instead of
> CPUTIME_IOWAIT, causing diff < 50 and failing the test.
So reading the test, the reason this doesn't fail constantly (on a non-isolated
machine) is the massive margins?
It pins the io_uring_wait_cqe_timeout() to CPU0 with either in_iowait=1 or
in_iowait=0.
It then asserts after 1s that CPU0 got:
a) for in_iowait=0 at most +10 iowait units (<10% CPU time)
b) for in_iowait=1 at least +50 iowait units (>50% CPU time)
So a) would fail on too many unrelated iowaits, b) would fail on unrelated
runnable tasks.
I don't think validating the per-task in_iowait setting via the CPU aggregate
is really feasible FWIW.
>
> Fix this by checking nr_iowait_cpu() in kcpustat_irq_enter(). If the CPU is
> currently in iowait, pause and settle the elapsed time to CPUTIME_IOWAIT
> before the interrupt handler runs. On kcpustat_irq_exit(), resume
> accounting if it was paused.
>
> Fixes: 7198e3927a14 ("sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/cputime.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> index 06bddaa738e5..e8b56433c61c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -496,7 +496,8 @@ void kcpustat_irq_enter(u64 now)
> struct kernel_cpustat *kc = kcpustat_this_cpu;
>
> if (!vtime_generic_enabled_this_cpu() &&
> - (irqtime_enabled() || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu()))
> + (irqtime_enabled() || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu() ||
> + nr_iowait_cpu(smp_processor_id()) > 0))
> kcpustat_idle_stop(kc, now);
> }
>
> @@ -510,9 +511,13 @@ void kcpustat_irq_exit(u64 now)
> * need to pause nohz accounting. Resume nohz accounting as long
> * as the irqtime config is enabled to handle case where irqtime
> * accounting got runtime disabled in the middle of an IRQ.
> + *
> + * Also resume accounting if it was paused on IRQ enter due to
> + * iowait.
> */
> if (!vtime_generic_enabled_this_cpu() &&
> - (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING) || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu()))
> + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING) || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu() ||
> + !kc->idle_elapse))
> kcpustat_idle_start(kc, now);
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-14 14:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-14 1:52 [PATCH v1] sched/cputime: Preserve iowait accounting across waking interrupts in dyntick-idle Wei Gao
2026-10-14 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-14 13:17 ` Christian Loehle
2026-10-14 14:14 ` Christian Loehle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®