* [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: core: Factor hba->outstanding_reqs helper and fix double completion
@ 2026-10-17 8:43 Stanley Jhu
2026-10-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] scsi: ufs: core: Add a helper for clearing hba->outstanding_reqs Stanley Jhu
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stanley Jhu @ 2026-10-17 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin K . Petersen, linux-scsi
Cc: James E . J . Bottomley, Bart Van Assche, Alim Akhtar, Bean Huo,
Peter Wang, Can Guo, linux-kernel, stable
In Single Doorbell (SDB) mode, ufshcd_clear_lu_cmds() clears a transfer
request slot in the controller and completes the request without
claiming its bit in hba->outstanding_reqs. A subsequent ufshcd_poll()
call sees the stale bit with its doorbell bit cleared and completes the
request a second time, causing a double DMA unmap.
Patch 1 adds __ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs() and
ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs() to share the bit-claim logic across
ufshcd_poll() and ufshcd_abort() with no functional change. Patch 2 uses
the new helper in ufshcd_clear_lu_cmds() to fix the SDB double
completion. Patch 3 uses the new helper in ufshcd_eh_timed_out(). It is
a follow-on cleanup and is not needed for the fix. Patch 4 removes a
WARN_ONCE() whose condition is always false.
This series is based on mkp/for-next (db8b4d2bf2d3).
Tested on QEMU ARM64 UFS in SDB and MCQ modes across LU reset, polled
and interrupt I/O, and task abort without double completion or DMA
unmap warnings.
Changes since v1:
- Add a helper for clearing hba->outstanding_reqs and use it in
ufshcd_poll(), ufshcd_abort(), and ufshcd_clear_lu_cmds()
(Bart Van Assche).
- Convert ufshcd_eh_timed_out() to use the new helper in patch 3.
- Remove an always-false WARN_ONCE() in patch 4.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261016085403.1711740-1-stanleyjhu@google.com
Stanley Jhu (4):
scsi: ufs: core: Add a helper for clearing hba->outstanding_reqs
scsi: ufs: core: Fix double completion in ufshcd_clear_lu_cmds()
scsi: ufs: core: Use ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs() in
ufshcd_eh_timed_out()
scsi: ufs: core: Remove an always-false WARN_ONCE()
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
base-commit: db8b4d2bf2d3e02b4ff78bbf69d00e11795840de
--
2.56.0.176.g3575e65682-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/4] scsi: ufs: core: Add a helper for clearing hba->outstanding_reqs
2026-10-17 8:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: core: Factor hba->outstanding_reqs helper and fix double completion Stanley Jhu
@ 2026-10-17 8:44 ` Stanley Jhu
2026-10-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] scsi: ufs: core: Fix double completion in ufshcd_clear_lu_cmds() Stanley Jhu
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stanley Jhu @ 2026-10-17 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin K . Petersen, linux-scsi
Cc: James E . J . Bottomley, Bart Van Assche, Alim Akhtar, Bean Huo,
Peter Wang, Can Guo, linux-kernel, stable
ufshcd_poll() and ufshcd_abort() each have their own copy of the code
that clears bits in hba->outstanding_reqs under hba->outstanding_lock.
Move that code into ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs() and its locked
variant __ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(), and use them in both
functions. No functional change.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3779e125-9acc-42c8-9489-51b9e3c6716d@acm.org
Signed-off-by: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>
---
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index bcc2512bf34b..71f4b9d0a850 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -6052,6 +6052,37 @@ static void ufshcd_clear_polled(struct ufs_hba *hba,
}
}
+static unsigned long __ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(struct ufs_hba *hba,
+ unsigned long mask,
+ bool from_irq)
+{
+ unsigned long completed_reqs = mask & hba->outstanding_reqs;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&hba->outstanding_lock);
+ WARN_ONCE(completed_reqs & ~hba->outstanding_reqs,
+ "completed: %#lx; outstanding: %#lx\n", completed_reqs,
+ hba->outstanding_reqs);
+ if (from_irq) {
+ /* Do not complete polled requests from interrupt context. */
+ ufshcd_clear_polled(hba, &completed_reqs);
+ }
+ hba->outstanding_reqs &= ~completed_reqs;
+
+ return completed_reqs;
+}
+
+static unsigned long ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(struct ufs_hba *hba,
+ unsigned long mask)
+{
+ unsigned long completed_reqs, flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
+ completed_reqs = __ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(hba, mask, false);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
+
+ return completed_reqs;
+}
+
/*
* Return: > 0 if one or more commands have been completed or 0 if no
* requests have been completed.
@@ -6071,15 +6102,9 @@ static int ufshcd_poll(struct Scsi_Host *shost, unsigned int queue_num)
spin_lock_irqsave(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
tr_doorbell = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
- completed_reqs = ~tr_doorbell & hba->outstanding_reqs;
- WARN_ONCE(completed_reqs & ~hba->outstanding_reqs,
- "completed: %#lx; outstanding: %#lx\n", completed_reqs,
- hba->outstanding_reqs);
- if (queue_num == UFSHCD_POLL_FROM_INTERRUPT_CONTEXT) {
- /* Do not complete polled requests from interrupt context. */
- ufshcd_clear_polled(hba, &completed_reqs);
- }
- hba->outstanding_reqs &= ~completed_reqs;
+ completed_reqs =
+ __ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(hba, ~tr_doorbell,
+ queue_num == UFSHCD_POLL_FROM_INTERRUPT_CONTEXT);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
if (completed_reqs)
@@ -8114,7 +8139,6 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp = scsi_cmd_priv(cmd);
unsigned long flags;
int err = FAILED;
- bool outstanding;
u32 reg;
ufshcd_hold(hba);
@@ -8209,11 +8233,7 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
* Clear the corresponding bit from outstanding_reqs since the command
* has been aborted successfully.
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
- outstanding = __test_and_clear_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
-
- if (outstanding)
+ if (ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(hba, BIT(tag)))
ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd(hba, cmd);
err = SUCCESS;
--
2.56.0.176.g3575e65682-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/4] scsi: ufs: core: Fix double completion in ufshcd_clear_lu_cmds()
2026-10-17 8:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: core: Factor hba->outstanding_reqs helper and fix double completion Stanley Jhu
2026-10-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] scsi: ufs: core: Add a helper for clearing hba->outstanding_reqs Stanley Jhu
@ 2026-10-17 8:44 ` Stanley Jhu
2026-10-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] scsi: ufs: core: Use ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs() in ufshcd_eh_timed_out() Stanley Jhu
2026-10-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] scsi: ufs: core: Remove an always-false WARN_ONCE() Stanley Jhu
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stanley Jhu @ 2026-10-17 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin K . Petersen, linux-scsi
Cc: James E . J . Bottomley, Bart Van Assche, Alim Akhtar, Bean Huo,
Peter Wang, Can Guo, linux-kernel, stable
In SDB mode, ufshcd_clear_lu_cmds() clears the request slot in the
controller and completes the request, but leaves its bit set in
hba->outstanding_reqs. ufshcd_poll() treats a request whose bit is set
in hba->outstanding_reqs and clear in the doorbell register as finished,
so the next ufshcd_poll() completes the same request again and unmaps
its DMA buffers twice.
Clear the bit with ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs() before completing the
request, and complete it only if the bit was still set. If ufshcd_poll()
has already completed the request, the bit is already clear and
ufshcd_clear_lu_cmds() skips it.
Fixes: f18fac1e2b72 ("scsi: ufs: core: Rework ufshcd_eh_device_reset_handler()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>
---
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 71f4b9d0a850..531309c7fb79 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -7986,7 +7986,8 @@ static bool ufshcd_clear_lu_cmds(struct request *req, void *priv)
return true;
}
- ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(hba, tag, NULL);
+ if (ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(hba, BIT(tag)))
+ ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(hba, tag, NULL);
return true;
}
--
2.56.0.176.g3575e65682-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/4] scsi: ufs: core: Use ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs() in ufshcd_eh_timed_out()
2026-10-17 8:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: core: Factor hba->outstanding_reqs helper and fix double completion Stanley Jhu
2026-10-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] scsi: ufs: core: Add a helper for clearing hba->outstanding_reqs Stanley Jhu
2026-10-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] scsi: ufs: core: Fix double completion in ufshcd_clear_lu_cmds() Stanley Jhu
@ 2026-10-17 8:44 ` Stanley Jhu
2026-10-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] scsi: ufs: core: Remove an always-false WARN_ONCE() Stanley Jhu
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stanley Jhu @ 2026-10-17 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin K . Petersen, linux-scsi
Cc: James E . J . Bottomley, Bart Van Assche, Alim Akhtar, Bean Huo,
Peter Wang, Can Guo, linux-kernel, stable
ufshcd_eh_timed_out() has its own copy of the code that clears the
timed-out tag in hba->outstanding_reqs. Use
ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs() instead. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>
---
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 531309c7fb79..44e571757535 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -9659,12 +9659,9 @@ static enum scsi_timeout_action ufshcd_eh_timed_out(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
*/
if (!test_bit(SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE, &scmd->state)) {
if (!hba->mcq_enabled) {
- unsigned long flags;
struct request *rq = scsi_cmd_to_rq(scmd);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
- __clear_bit(rq->tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
+ ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(hba, BIT(rq->tag));
}
if (ufshcd_is_scsi_cmd(scmd)) {
--
2.56.0.176.g3575e65682-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 4/4] scsi: ufs: core: Remove an always-false WARN_ONCE()
2026-10-17 8:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: core: Factor hba->outstanding_reqs helper and fix double completion Stanley Jhu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-10-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] scsi: ufs: core: Use ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs() in ufshcd_eh_timed_out() Stanley Jhu
@ 2026-10-17 8:44 ` Stanley Jhu
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stanley Jhu @ 2026-10-17 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin K . Petersen, linux-scsi
Cc: James E . J . Bottomley, Bart Van Assche, Alim Akhtar, Bean Huo,
Peter Wang, Can Guo, linux-kernel, stable
The WARN_ONCE() in __ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs() can never fire.
completed_reqs is set to mask & hba->outstanding_reqs on the line above,
and hba->outstanding_reqs cannot change in between because the caller
holds hba->outstanding_lock. So completed_reqs & ~hba->outstanding_reqs
is always zero. Remove it. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>
---
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 44e571757535..716dab2352e9 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -6059,9 +6059,6 @@ static unsigned long __ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs(struct ufs_hba *hba,
unsigned long completed_reqs = mask & hba->outstanding_reqs;
lockdep_assert_held(&hba->outstanding_lock);
- WARN_ONCE(completed_reqs & ~hba->outstanding_reqs,
- "completed: %#lx; outstanding: %#lx\n", completed_reqs,
- hba->outstanding_reqs);
if (from_irq) {
/* Do not complete polled requests from interrupt context. */
ufshcd_clear_polled(hba, &completed_reqs);
--
2.56.0.176.g3575e65682-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-17 8:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-17 8:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: core: Factor hba->outstanding_reqs helper and fix double completion Stanley Jhu
2026-10-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] scsi: ufs: core: Add a helper for clearing hba->outstanding_reqs Stanley Jhu
2026-10-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] scsi: ufs: core: Fix double completion in ufshcd_clear_lu_cmds() Stanley Jhu
2026-10-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] scsi: ufs: core: Use ufshcd_clear_outstanding_reqs() in ufshcd_eh_timed_out() Stanley Jhu
2026-10-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] scsi: ufs: core: Remove an always-false WARN_ONCE() Stanley Jhu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®