* [PATCH v2] rcu-tasks: Avoid alloc_percpu() failure in rcu_tasks_rude_wait_gp()
@ 2026-10-19 12:22 Zqiang
2026-10-19 12:22 ` [PATCH v2] doc: Update recent RCU/SRCU API additions to whatisRCU.rst Zqiang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zqiang @ 2026-10-19 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck, frederic, neeraj.upadhyay, joelagnelf, urezki, boqun
Cc: qiang.zhang, rcu, linux-kernel
The RCU Tasks Rude grace period is implemented by invoking the
schedule_on_each_cpu() with an empty work function, which forces a context
switch on every online CPU and guarantees that all RCU Tasks Rude read
critical sections have completed. However, schedule_on_each_cpu() can
fail (via alloc_percpu() returning -ENOMEM) and returns immediately, in
which case those context switches never happen and also not wait for tasks
to exit the RCU Tasks Rude read critical section, too-short grace period
happen.
This commit therefore replace schedule_on_each_cpu() with a statically
defined per-CPU work_struct, which is allocated at compile time and cannot
fail in this path. rcu_tasks_rude_wait_gp() now holds CPU-hotplug readlock,
schedules rcu_tasks_be_rude() on each online CPUs, and flush each work item
before returning. This preserves the original behavior of the synchronous
API while removing both the runtime allocation.
Suggested-by: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
---
kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index fcac7361ec51..a59aa8b6ab05 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -1342,11 +1342,17 @@ void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { }
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
// "Rude" variant of Tasks RCU, inspired by Steve Rostedt's
-// trick of passing an empty function to schedule_on_each_cpu().
+// trick of passing an empty function to per-CPUs workqueue.
// This approach provides batching of concurrent calls to the synchronous
-// synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude() API. This invokes schedule_on_each_cpu()
-// in order to send IPIs far and wide and induces otherwise unnecessary
-// context switches on all online CPUs, whether idle or not.
+// synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude() API. A no-op work item is scheduled on
+// each online CPUs, in order to send IPIs far and wide and induces otherwise
+// unnecessary context switches on all online CPUs, whether idle or not.
+//
+// A statically defined per-CPU work_struct is used instead of a
+// runtime-allocated one, which can fail under memory pressure. Each
+// CPU's work item is scheduled with schedule_work_on() and waited for
+// with flush_work(), under the read side of the CPU-hotplug lock so the
+// set of online CPUs cannot change mid-iteration.
//
// Callback handling is provided by the rcu_tasks_kthread() function.
//
@@ -1357,11 +1363,25 @@ static void rcu_tasks_be_rude(struct work_struct *work)
{
}
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, tasks_rude_work);
+
// Wait for one rude RCU-tasks grace period.
static void rcu_tasks_rude_wait_gp(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
{
+ int cpu;
+
+ guard(cpus_read_lock)();
rtp->n_ipis += cpumask_weight(cpu_online_mask);
- schedule_on_each_cpu(rcu_tasks_be_rude);
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct work_struct *work = &per_cpu(tasks_rude_work, cpu);
+
+ INIT_WORK(work, rcu_tasks_be_rude);
+ schedule_work_on(cpu, work);
+ }
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ flush_work(&per_cpu(tasks_rude_work, cpu));
}
static void call_rcu_tasks_rude(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func);
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2] doc: Update recent RCU/SRCU API additions to whatisRCU.rst
2026-10-19 12:22 [PATCH v2] rcu-tasks: Avoid alloc_percpu() failure in rcu_tasks_rude_wait_gp() Zqiang
@ 2026-10-19 12:22 ` Zqiang
2026-10-19 15:12 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-10-19 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zqiang @ 2026-10-19 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck, frederic, neeraj.upadhyay, joelagnelf, urezki, boqun
Cc: qiang.zhang, rcu, linux-kernel
The following commit introduces some new RCU/SRCU APIs:
Commit 'd3f52f53a562 ("srcu: Create an SRCU-fast-updown API")'
Commit 'dab06d6f9379 ("srcutree: Add an atomic Tree SRCU")'
Commit 'cacadb630375 ("srcu: Add guards for notrace variants of SRCU-fast readers")'
Commit 'fa8a2d55139f ("srcu: Add lock guard for srcu_fast_updown flavor")'
Commit '954c0d741299 ("srcu: Add guards for SRCU-fast readers")'
This commit therefore update thems and some missing RCU related APIs
to whatisRCU.rst.
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
---
Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
index e6767baff2d3..fe9dc3948690 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
@@ -1084,8 +1084,9 @@ RCU::
rcu_dereference call_rcu
rcu_dereference_check call_rcu_hurry
rcu_dereference_protected kfree_rcu
- rcu_read_lock_held kvfree_rcu
- rcu_read_lock_any_held kfree_rcu_mightsleep
+ rcu_dereference_all kvfree_rcu
+ rcu_read_lock_held kfree_rcu_mightsleep
+ rcu_read_lock_any_held kvfree_rcu_mightsleep
rcu_pointer_handoff cond_synchronize_rcu
unrcu_pointer cond_synchronize_rcu_full
cond_synchronize_rcu_expedited
@@ -1209,13 +1210,23 @@ SRCU::
srcu_read_lock_nmisafe start_poll_synchronize_srcu
srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe start_poll_synchronize_srcu_expedited
srcu_read_lock_notrace poll_state_synchronize_srcu
- srcu_read_unlock_notrace
+ srcu_read_unlock_notrace synchronize_srcu_atomic
srcu_down_read
srcu_up_read
srcu_down_read_fast
srcu_up_read_fast
+ srcu_read_lock_fast_updown
+ srcu_read_unlock_fast_updown
+ srcu_read_lock_atomic
+ srcu_read_unlock_atomic
guard(srcu)()
+ guard(srcu_fast)()
+ guard(srcu_fast_notrace)()
+ guard(srcu_fast_updown)()
scoped_guard(srcu)
+ scoped_guard(srcu_fast)
+ scoped_guard(srcu_fast_notrace)
+ scoped_guard(srcu_fast_updown)
srcu_read_lock_held
srcu_dereference
srcu_dereference_check
@@ -1229,9 +1240,16 @@ SRCU: Initialization/cleanup/ordering::
DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU
DEFINE_SRCU_FAST // for srcu_read_lock_fast() and friends
DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_FAST // for srcu_read_lock_fast() and friends
+ DEFINE_SRCU_FAST_UPDOWN // for srcu_read_lock_fast_updown() and friends
+ DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_FAST_UPDOWN // for srcu_read_lock_fast_updown() and friends
+ DEFINE_SRCU_ATOMIC // for srcu_read_lock_atomic() and friends
+ DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_ATOMIC // for srcu_read_lock_atomic() and friends
init_srcu_struct
init_srcu_struct_fast
+ init_srcu_struct_fast_updown
+ init_srcu_struct_atomic
cleanup_srcu_struct
+ smp_mb__after_srcu_read_lock
smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock
All: lockdep-checked RCU utility APIs::
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] doc: Update recent RCU/SRCU API additions to whatisRCU.rst
2026-10-19 12:22 ` [PATCH v2] doc: Update recent RCU/SRCU API additions to whatisRCU.rst Zqiang
@ 2026-10-19 15:12 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-10-19 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bradley Morgan @ 2026-10-19 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qiang.zhang
Cc: boqun, frederic, joelagnelf, linux-kernel, neeraj.upadhyay,
paulmck, rcu, urezki
On 19 October 2026 13:22:09 BST, Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev> wrote:
>The following commit introduces some new RCU/SRCU APIs:
>
>Commit 'd3f52f53a562 ("srcu: Create an SRCU-fast-updown API")'
>Commit 'dab06d6f9379 ("srcutree: Add an atomic Tree SRCU")'
>Commit 'cacadb630375 ("srcu: Add guards for notrace variants of SRCU-fast
>readers")'
>Commit 'fa8a2d55139f ("srcu: Add lock guard for srcu_fast_updown flavor")'
>Commit '954c0d741299 ("srcu: Add guards for SRCU-fast readers")'
>
>This commit therefore update thems and some missing RCU related APIs
>to whatisRCU.rst.
>
Since this relates to my patch, and it looks good:
Acked-by: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
>Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
>---
> Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
>index e6767baff2d3..fe9dc3948690 100644
>--- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
>+++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
>@@ -1084,8 +1084,9 @@ RCU::
> rcu_dereference call_rcu
> rcu_dereference_check call_rcu_hurry
> rcu_dereference_protected kfree_rcu
>- rcu_read_lock_held kvfree_rcu
>- rcu_read_lock_any_held kfree_rcu_mightsleep
>+ rcu_dereference_all kvfree_rcu
>+ rcu_read_lock_held kfree_rcu_mightsleep
>+ rcu_read_lock_any_held kvfree_rcu_mightsleep
> rcu_pointer_handoff cond_synchronize_rcu
> unrcu_pointer cond_synchronize_rcu_full
> cond_synchronize_rcu_expedited
>@@ -1209,13 +1210,23 @@ SRCU::
> srcu_read_lock_nmisafe start_poll_synchronize_srcu
> srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe start_poll_synchronize_srcu_expedited
> srcu_read_lock_notrace poll_state_synchronize_srcu
>- srcu_read_unlock_notrace
>+ srcu_read_unlock_notrace synchronize_srcu_atomic
> srcu_down_read
> srcu_up_read
> srcu_down_read_fast
> srcu_up_read_fast
>+ srcu_read_lock_fast_updown
>+ srcu_read_unlock_fast_updown
>+ srcu_read_lock_atomic
>+ srcu_read_unlock_atomic
> guard(srcu)()
>+ guard(srcu_fast)()
>+ guard(srcu_fast_notrace)()
>+ guard(srcu_fast_updown)()
> scoped_guard(srcu)
>+ scoped_guard(srcu_fast)
>+ scoped_guard(srcu_fast_notrace)
>+ scoped_guard(srcu_fast_updown)
> srcu_read_lock_held
> srcu_dereference
> srcu_dereference_check
>@@ -1229,9 +1240,16 @@ SRCU: Initialization/cleanup/ordering::
> DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU
> DEFINE_SRCU_FAST // for srcu_read_lock_fast() and friends
> DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_FAST // for srcu_read_lock_fast() and friends
>+ DEFINE_SRCU_FAST_UPDOWN // for srcu_read_lock_fast_updown() and friends
>+ DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_FAST_UPDOWN // for srcu_read_lock_fast_updown() and friends
>+ DEFINE_SRCU_ATOMIC // for srcu_read_lock_atomic() and friends
>+ DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_ATOMIC // for srcu_read_lock_atomic() and friends
> init_srcu_struct
> init_srcu_struct_fast
>+ init_srcu_struct_fast_updown
>+ init_srcu_struct_atomic
> cleanup_srcu_struct
>+ smp_mb__after_srcu_read_lock
> smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock
>
> All: lockdep-checked RCU utility APIs::
>
--- Thanks!
"I'm not a very positive person" - Linus torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] doc: Update recent RCU/SRCU API additions to whatisRCU.rst
2026-10-19 12:22 ` [PATCH v2] doc: Update recent RCU/SRCU API additions to whatisRCU.rst Zqiang
2026-10-19 15:12 ` Bradley Morgan
@ 2026-10-19 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2026-10-19 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zqiang
Cc: frederic, neeraj.upadhyay, joelagnelf, urezki, boqun, rcu, linux-kernel
On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 08:22:09PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> The following commit introduces some new RCU/SRCU APIs:
>
> Commit 'd3f52f53a562 ("srcu: Create an SRCU-fast-updown API")'
> Commit 'dab06d6f9379 ("srcutree: Add an atomic Tree SRCU")'
> Commit 'cacadb630375 ("srcu: Add guards for notrace variants of SRCU-fast readers")'
> Commit 'fa8a2d55139f ("srcu: Add lock guard for srcu_fast_updown flavor")'
> Commit '954c0d741299 ("srcu: Add guards for SRCU-fast readers")'
>
> This commit therefore update thems and some missing RCU related APIs
> to whatisRCU.rst.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
Thank you, for both patches:
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
> index e6767baff2d3..fe9dc3948690 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
> @@ -1084,8 +1084,9 @@ RCU::
> rcu_dereference call_rcu
> rcu_dereference_check call_rcu_hurry
> rcu_dereference_protected kfree_rcu
> - rcu_read_lock_held kvfree_rcu
> - rcu_read_lock_any_held kfree_rcu_mightsleep
> + rcu_dereference_all kvfree_rcu
> + rcu_read_lock_held kfree_rcu_mightsleep
> + rcu_read_lock_any_held kvfree_rcu_mightsleep
> rcu_pointer_handoff cond_synchronize_rcu
> unrcu_pointer cond_synchronize_rcu_full
> cond_synchronize_rcu_expedited
> @@ -1209,13 +1210,23 @@ SRCU::
> srcu_read_lock_nmisafe start_poll_synchronize_srcu
> srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe start_poll_synchronize_srcu_expedited
> srcu_read_lock_notrace poll_state_synchronize_srcu
> - srcu_read_unlock_notrace
> + srcu_read_unlock_notrace synchronize_srcu_atomic
> srcu_down_read
> srcu_up_read
> srcu_down_read_fast
> srcu_up_read_fast
> + srcu_read_lock_fast_updown
> + srcu_read_unlock_fast_updown
> + srcu_read_lock_atomic
> + srcu_read_unlock_atomic
> guard(srcu)()
> + guard(srcu_fast)()
> + guard(srcu_fast_notrace)()
> + guard(srcu_fast_updown)()
> scoped_guard(srcu)
> + scoped_guard(srcu_fast)
> + scoped_guard(srcu_fast_notrace)
> + scoped_guard(srcu_fast_updown)
> srcu_read_lock_held
> srcu_dereference
> srcu_dereference_check
> @@ -1229,9 +1240,16 @@ SRCU: Initialization/cleanup/ordering::
> DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU
> DEFINE_SRCU_FAST // for srcu_read_lock_fast() and friends
> DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_FAST // for srcu_read_lock_fast() and friends
> + DEFINE_SRCU_FAST_UPDOWN // for srcu_read_lock_fast_updown() and friends
> + DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_FAST_UPDOWN // for srcu_read_lock_fast_updown() and friends
> + DEFINE_SRCU_ATOMIC // for srcu_read_lock_atomic() and friends
> + DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU_ATOMIC // for srcu_read_lock_atomic() and friends
> init_srcu_struct
> init_srcu_struct_fast
> + init_srcu_struct_fast_updown
> + init_srcu_struct_atomic
> cleanup_srcu_struct
> + smp_mb__after_srcu_read_lock
> smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock
>
> All: lockdep-checked RCU utility APIs::
> --
> 2.17.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-19 16:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-19 12:22 [PATCH v2] rcu-tasks: Avoid alloc_percpu() failure in rcu_tasks_rude_wait_gp() Zqiang
2026-10-19 12:22 ` [PATCH v2] doc: Update recent RCU/SRCU API additions to whatisRCU.rst Zqiang
2026-10-19 15:12 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-10-19 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®