* [PATCH] mm, swap: revalidate populated clusters before scanning
@ 2026-10-19 16:06 Nhat Pham
2026-10-19 16:16 ` Nhat Pham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nhat Pham @ 2026-10-19 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Chris Li, Kairui Song, Kemeng Shi, Baoquan He, Barry Song,
Youngjun Park, linux-mm, linux-kernel, stable
swap_cluster_populate() can publish a cluster's table with the cluster
lock dropped. A cached allocator can use and empty it before the
populating allocator reacquires the lock. The resumed scan can then
dereference a NULL table.
For example, CPU1 can retain a cached cluster offset on an SSD with
per-page discard disabled:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
swap_cluster_populate()
swap_cluster_alloc_table() fails
spin_unlock(&ci->lock)
local_unlock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock)
swap_cluster_alloc_table()
rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, table)
swap_alloc_fast()
local_unlock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock)
mem_cgroup_try_charge_swap() fails
swap_cache_del_folio()
__swap_cluster_free_entries()
free_cluster()
__free_cluster()
swap_cluster_free_table()
rcu_assign_pointer(..., NULL)
local_lock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock)
spin_lock(&ci->lock)
return ci
alloc_swap_scan_cluster()
cluster_scan_range()
__swap_table_get()
Reject an unusable cluster under its lock before scanning it. Relocate
it only while its table is present.
Fixes: cdd77f84d966 ("mm, swap: consolidate cluster allocation helpers")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
---
mm/swapfile.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index c3288910b3e3..988b7316e0a1 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -981,7 +981,11 @@ static unsigned int alloc_swap_scan_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
bool need_reclaim, ret, usable;
lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
- VM_WARN_ON(!cluster_is_usable(ci, order));
+ if (!cluster_is_usable(ci, order)) {
+ if (cluster_table_is_alloced(ci))
+ relocate_cluster(si, ci);
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
if (end < nr_pages || ci->count + nr_pages > SWAPFILE_CLUSTER)
goto out;
@@ -1010,6 +1014,7 @@ static unsigned int alloc_swap_scan_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
}
out:
relocate_cluster(si, ci);
+out_unlock:
swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
if (si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE) {
this_cpu_write(percpu_swap_cluster.offset[order], next);
base-commit: 4dbe24720eb3811563cd56b35d87ddf3f9beed2a
--
2.53.0-Meta
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mm, swap: revalidate populated clusters before scanning
2026-10-19 16:06 [PATCH] mm, swap: revalidate populated clusters before scanning Nhat Pham
@ 2026-10-19 16:16 ` Nhat Pham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nhat Pham @ 2026-10-19 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Chris Li, Kairui Song, Baoquan He, Barry Song, Youngjun Park,
linux-mm, linux-kernel, stable
On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 9:06 AM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> swap_cluster_populate() can publish a cluster's table with the cluster
> lock dropped. A cached allocator can use and empty it before the
> populating allocator reacquires the lock. The resumed scan can then
> dereference a NULL table.
>
> For example, CPU1 can retain a cached cluster offset on an SSD with
> per-page discard disabled:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> swap_cluster_populate()
> swap_cluster_alloc_table() fails
> spin_unlock(&ci->lock)
> local_unlock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock)
> swap_cluster_alloc_table()
> rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, table)
> swap_alloc_fast()
> local_unlock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock)
> mem_cgroup_try_charge_swap() fails
> swap_cache_del_folio()
> __swap_cluster_free_entries()
> free_cluster()
> __free_cluster()
> swap_cluster_free_table()
> rcu_assign_pointer(..., NULL)
> local_lock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock)
> spin_lock(&ci->lock)
> return ci
> alloc_swap_scan_cluster()
> cluster_scan_range()
> __swap_table_get()
>
> Reject an unusable cluster under its lock before scanning it. Relocate
> it only while its table is present.
>
> Fixes: cdd77f84d966 ("mm, swap: consolidate cluster allocation helpers")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
I'm revisiting the lifecycle of clusters, because vswap introduced
dynamic (i.e run-time freeing) behavior to it. For the most part it
looks good (both physical and virtual side), but this look racy to me.
I don't see how it can be safe. Once you drop the lock, all bets are
off...
But at the same time, I have not been able to reproduce it (yet). Will
report here if I manage to.
(Side note: my vswap code is actually safe in this scenario. CPU0
allocates a new cluster entirely, and lock it before publishing it. So
even if the cluster index is cached in CPU1, this race cannot happen).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-19 16:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-19 16:06 [PATCH] mm, swap: revalidate populated clusters before scanning Nhat Pham
2026-10-19 16:16 ` Nhat Pham
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®