From: Vlad Poenaru <vlad.wing@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vlad Poenaru <thevlad@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net/sched: don't wait for RCU when destroying qdisc lockdep keys
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:02:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261019170225.729789-1-vlad.wing@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Vlad Poenaru <thevlad@meta.com>
On kernels with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, every qdisc except ingress, clsact
and noqueue has a dynamic lockdep key, and destroying the qdisc calls
lockdep_unregister_key(), which waits for an expedited RCU grace period.
Replacing an mq root destroys one qdisc per TX queue under RTNL, so a
single "tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root mq" waits for that many grace
periods. Commit 7a3cedafccf8 ("lockdep: Speed up lockdep_unregister_key()
with expedited RCU synchronization") made each wait shorter as a
temporary workaround until hazard pointers are available.
The wait is redundant for qdiscs: the qdisc is freed with call_rcu()
after its key is unregistered, so the key's memory already outlives an
RCU grace period. Patch 1 revives Bart Van Assche's
lockdep_unregister_key_nosync() [1], with the grace-period requirement
spelled out, and patch 2 uses it for qdisc keys, as Eric suggested [2].
Boqun was concerned that a nosync variant is hard to enforce and review,
since a later refactor could move the free [3]. For qdiscs the RCU-deferred
free is not optional: datapath readers find the qdisc under RCU, so
freeing it synchronously would already be a use-after-free regardless of
lockdep. Patch 2 also documents the requirement at qdisc_lock_uninit().
The hazptr-based replacement for the wait is still under discussion [4];
if it lands, the nosync variant can stay as the no-wait path or be
dropped.
On an x86_64 KASAN + PROVE_LOCKING kernel (64 vCPU KVM guest, 64-queue
netdevsim device, 214K lock chains) this removes 5.3 ms of grace-period
wait from each of the 65 qdisc destroys in "tc qdisc replace dev eth0
root handle 1: mq".
A separate lockdep patch, sent to tip, makes the zap_class() part of
lockdep_unregister_key() cheaper [5]; the two are independent. Nilay
Shroff's pending "lockdep: Fix subclass resource leak in
lockdep_unregister_key()" [6] touches the same function as patch 1;
whichever lands second needs a trivial rebase.
Peter, Boqun, Waiman: if patch 1 looks fine, an Ack for taking it
through net-next with its user would be appreciated.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250203175939.3133477-2-bvanassche@acm.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANn89iLvu_ijSV+FnrZ6qei_Ty2c9V-RjwLMk24+oOS91bNjaQ@mail.gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z-OPya5HoqbKmMGj@Mac.home/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261005171529.1378809-9-kunwu.chan@gmail.com/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261019170018.699298-1-vlad.wing@gmail.com/
[6] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260727182312.3750145-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com/
Bart Van Assche (1):
lockdep: Introduce lockdep_unregister_key_nosync()
Vlad Poenaru (1):
net/sched: Don't wait for RCU when unregistering the qdisc lockdep key
include/linux/lockdep.h | 5 +++++
include/net/pkt_sched.h | 3 ++-
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
net/sched/sch_generic.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0-Meta
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 17:02 Vlad Poenaru [this message]
2026-10-19 17:02 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] lockdep: Introduce lockdep_unregister_key_nosync() Vlad Poenaru
2026-10-19 17:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-10-19 17:02 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/sched: Don't wait for RCU when unregistering the qdisc lockdep key Vlad Poenaru
2026-10-19 17:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-10-19 19:20 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] net/sched: don't wait for RCU when destroying qdisc lockdep keys Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261019170225.729789-1-vlad.wing@gmail.com \
--to=vlad.wing@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thevlad@meta.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®