mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Poenaru <vlad.wing@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] lockdep: Introduce lockdep_unregister_key_nosync()
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:02:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261019170225.729789-2-vlad.wing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261019170225.729789-1-vlad.wing@gmail.com>

From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>

Add a variant of lockdep_unregister_key() that neither sleeps nor waits
for an RCU grace period. Instead the caller must make sure that a grace
period elapses after the call before the memory holding the key is
freed or reused.

That lets callers that already free the key's memory with call_rcu() or
kfree_rcu() avoid waiting for a second grace period. The qdisc code is
such a caller: all qdiscs except ingress, clsact and noqueue embed a
dynamic lockdep key and are freed with call_rcu(), and replacing an mq
root on a multi-queue NIC destroys one qdisc per TX queue under RTNL,
each currently waiting for its own expedited grace period.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250203175939.3133477-2-bvanassche@acm.org/
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
[vlad: rebase onto synchronize_rcu_expedited(), spell out the grace
 period requirement in the comments and changelog, describe the qdisc
 use case]
Signed-off-by: Vlad Poenaru <vlad.wing@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/lockdep.h  |  5 +++++
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index a6451ecbbe9a0..80b27973b7f72 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ do {							\
 } while (0)
 
 extern void lockdep_register_key(struct lock_class_key *key);
+extern void lockdep_unregister_key_nosync(struct lock_class_key *key);
 extern void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key);
 
 /*
@@ -375,6 +376,10 @@ static inline void lockdep_register_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
 {
 }
 
+static inline void lockdep_unregister_key_nosync(struct lock_class_key *key)
+{
+}
+
 static inline void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
 {
 }
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index c3dc84a7cef26..16c8480e282e3 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -6669,13 +6669,19 @@ void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
 }
 
 /*
- * Unregister a dynamically allocated key.
+ * Unregister a dynamically allocated key without waiting for RCU readers.
  *
  * Unlike lockdep_register_key(), a search is always done to find a matching
  * key irrespective of debug_locks to avoid potential invalid access to freed
  * memory in lock_class entry.
+ *
+ * is_dynamic_key() may still be walking past @key under RCU when this
+ * returns. The memory holding @key must not be freed or reused, including by
+ * registering @key again, until an RCU grace period that starts after this
+ * call has elapsed, e.g. by freeing it with call_rcu() or kfree_rcu() queued
+ * after this call. Does not sleep.
  */
-void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
+void lockdep_unregister_key_nosync(struct lock_class_key *key)
 {
 	struct hlist_head *hash_head = keyhashentry(key);
 	struct lock_class_key *k;
@@ -6684,8 +6690,6 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
 	bool found = false;
 	bool need_callback = false;
 
-	might_sleep();
-
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(static_obj(key)))
 		return;
 
@@ -6711,15 +6715,25 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
 
 	if (need_callback)
 		call_rcu(&delayed_free.rcu_head, free_zapped_rcu);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_unregister_key_nosync);
+
+/*
+ * Unregister a dynamically allocated key and wait for is_dynamic_key()
+ * readers, so that the memory holding @key may be freed as soon as this
+ * returns. May sleep.
+ */
+void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
+{
+	might_sleep();
+
+	lockdep_unregister_key_nosync(key);
 
 	/*
-	 * Wait until is_dynamic_key() has finished accessing k->hash_entry.
-	 *
-	 * Some operations like __qdisc_destroy() will call this in a debug
-	 * kernel, and the network traffic is disabled while waiting, hence
-	 * the delay of the wait matters in debugging cases. Currently use a
-	 * synchronize_rcu_expedited() to speed up the wait at the cost of
-	 * system IPIs. TODO: Replace RCU with hazptr for this.
+	 * Expedited to keep the wait short, at the cost of IPIs. Callers that
+	 * free @key after a grace period anyway should use
+	 * lockdep_unregister_key_nosync() instead.
+	 * TODO: Replace RCU with hazptr for this.
 	 */
 	synchronize_rcu_expedited();
 }
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-19 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-19 17:02 [PATCH net-next 0/2] net/sched: don't wait for RCU when destroying qdisc lockdep keys Vlad Poenaru
2026-10-19 17:02 ` Vlad Poenaru [this message]
2026-10-19 17:38   ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] lockdep: Introduce lockdep_unregister_key_nosync() Eric Dumazet
2026-10-19 17:02 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/sched: Don't wait for RCU when unregistering the qdisc lockdep key Vlad Poenaru
2026-10-19 17:37   ` Eric Dumazet
2026-10-19 19:20 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] net/sched: don't wait for RCU when destroying qdisc lockdep keys Boqun Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261019170225.729789-2-vlad.wing@gmail.com \
    --to=vlad.wing@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dcaratti@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®