mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv/vmbus: copy dynamic IDs before dropping the lock
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 15:35:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026101936-livable-plug-8bc9@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261019085544.1834700-1-yaojiale02@163.com>

On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 04:55:44PM +0800, Jiale Yao wrote:
> remove_id_store() can free a matching dynamic ID while VMBus is
> preparing to invoke a driver probe.

And how can that be triggered?

> Copy the ID while holding the dynamic ID lock so probe never receives
> a pointer into a freed list entry.

Why is this driver allowed to handle dynamic ids at all?  Is it really
required?  That will taint the kernel so no real workflow requires it,
right?

> Fixes: fc76936d3ea5 ("vmbus: add support for dynamic device id's")

No cc: stable?

> Signed-off-by: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> index 4692687cdbf3..96ad0dfaa50b 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> @@ -661,21 +661,22 @@ hv_vmbus_dev_match(const struct hv_vmbus_device_id *id, const guid_t *guid)
>  }
>  
>  static const struct hv_vmbus_device_id *
> -hv_vmbus_dynid_match(struct hv_driver *drv, const guid_t *guid)
> +hv_vmbus_dynid_match(struct hv_driver *drv, const guid_t *guid,
> +		     struct hv_vmbus_device_id *id_copy)
>  {
> -	const struct hv_vmbus_device_id *id = NULL;
>  	struct vmbus_dynid *dynid;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&drv->dynids.lock);
>  	list_for_each_entry(dynid, &drv->dynids.list, node) {
>  		if (guid_equal(&dynid->id.guid, guid)) {
> -			id = &dynid->id;
> -			break;
> +			*id_copy = dynid->id;

Shouldn't this be a memcpy() as that's what you are really doing?

> +			spin_unlock(&drv->dynids.lock);

guard() usage instead?

> +			return id_copy;
>  		}
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&drv->dynids.lock);
>  
> -	return id;
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  
>  static const struct hv_vmbus_device_id vmbus_device_null;
> @@ -685,7 +686,8 @@ static const struct hv_vmbus_device_id vmbus_device_null;
>   * If there is no match, return NULL.
>   */
>  static const struct hv_vmbus_device_id *hv_vmbus_get_id(const struct hv_driver *drv,
> -							struct hv_device *dev)
> +							struct hv_device *dev,
> +							struct hv_vmbus_device_id *id_copy)
>  {
>  	const guid_t *guid = &dev->dev_type;
>  	const struct hv_vmbus_device_id *id;
> @@ -697,7 +699,7 @@ static const struct hv_vmbus_device_id *hv_vmbus_get_id(const struct hv_driver *
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	/* Look at the dynamic ids first, before the static ones */
> -	id = hv_vmbus_dynid_match((struct hv_driver *)drv, guid);
> +	id = hv_vmbus_dynid_match((struct hv_driver *)drv, guid, id_copy);
>  	if (!id)
>  		id = hv_vmbus_dev_match(drv->id_table, guid);
>  
> @@ -773,6 +775,7 @@ static ssize_t new_id_store(struct device_driver *driver, const char *buf,
>  			    size_t count)
>  {
>  	struct hv_driver *drv = drv_to_hv_drv(driver);
> +	struct hv_vmbus_device_id id_copy;

On the stack?

Ok, I guess this would work, but it feels clunky, why doesn't all other
busses have to do this too?

thanks,

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-19 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-19  8:55 Jiale Yao
2026-10-19 13:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026101936-livable-plug-8bc9@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    --cc=yaojiale02@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®