* [PATCH net v3] tls: fix the open record check in the max payload size setsockopt
@ 2026-10-20 12:12 Jiayuan Chen
2026-10-20 12:18 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jiayuan Chen @ 2026-10-20 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, sd
Cc: Jiayuan Chen, John Fastabend, Jakub Kicinski, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, Wilfred Mallawa,
linux-kernel
do_tls_setsockopt_tx_payload_len() refuses to resize records while one is
open, but the check is broken in two ways.
It reaches for the open record through tls_sw_ctx_tx(), an unchecked cast
of ctx->priv_ctx_tx. Under device offload that pointer is a
tls_offload_context_tx, so the check reads a field of the wrong struct: it
returns EBUSY on whatever happens to be there, and never sees the record
that really is open. Dispatch on tx_conf.
The socket lock alone is also not enough to tell no sender is in flight.
The device tx path drops it in sk_stream_wait_memory() after
tls_push_record() cleared open_record, so setsockopt can slip in
mid-sendmsg and shrink the limit. tls_push_data() latches the limit once
per call, and a record left open by MSG_MORE can then be bigger than the
new limit, making the u32 subtraction in the copy clamp wrap around and
build an oversized record. Take tx_lock like the sendmsg paths do so
setsockopt waits for in-flight senders. Re-reading the limit inside the
tls_push_data() loop could close the wrap too, but a parked sender would
still finish with the old limit, so serializing on tx_lock is simpler.
Take tx_lock interruptible, as tls_sw_sendmsg() does. Both sendmsg paths
keep it across sk_stream_wait_memory(), which sleeps until the peer reads,
so a plain mutex_lock() could park setsockopt in D state for as long as
the sender waits. The lock_sock() after it is fine uninterruptible: a
sender sleeping for memory has released the socket lock, so that wait only
covers short critical sections, like every other setsockopt.
Fixes: 82cb5be6ad64 ("net/tls: support setting the maximum payload size")
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
---
v2 -> v3:
- no code change, explain why tx_lock is taken interruptible, in the
commit message and the comment (Paolo)
- resend, v2 was marked "changes requested" in patchwork, thanks to
Sabrina for the reminder:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/atdJUP6Jb0jODBYE@krikkit/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260901072927.128688-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev/
v1 -> v2:
- also take tx_lock in setsockopt, the socket lock alone can't stop a
device sender parked in sk_stream_wait_memory() (AI review on v1)
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260831025607.62927-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev/
base on my netdevsim + tls (in progress)
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260728125658.390500-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev/
Previous finding:
b17cf742eaad ("tls: device: fix out-of-bounds write in tls_append_frag()")
---
net/tls/tls_main.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c
index 8bdb78718a8d..42ab291eee42 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
@@ -831,15 +831,29 @@ static int do_tls_setsockopt_no_pad(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval,
return rc;
}
+/* priv_ctx_tx holds a different structure on each TX path, so tx_conf has to
+ * say which open record to look at.
+ */
+static bool tls_tx_record_is_open(struct tls_context *ctx)
+{
+ switch (ctx->tx_conf) {
+ case TLS_SW:
+ return !!tls_sw_ctx_tx(ctx)->open_rec;
+ case TLS_HW:
+ return !!tls_offload_ctx_tx(ctx)->open_record;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
static int do_tls_setsockopt_tx_payload_len(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval,
unsigned int optlen)
{
struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
- struct tls_sw_context_tx *sw_ctx = tls_sw_ctx_tx(ctx);
u16 value;
bool tls_13 = ctx->prot_info.version == TLS_1_3_VERSION;
- if (sw_ctx && sw_ctx->open_rec)
+ if (tls_tx_record_is_open(ctx))
return -EBUSY;
if (sockptr_is_null(optval) || optlen != sizeof(value))
@@ -860,6 +874,7 @@ static int do_tls_setsockopt_tx_payload_len(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval,
static int do_tls_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname, sockptr_t optval,
unsigned int optlen)
{
+ struct tls_context *ctx;
int rc = 0;
switch (optname) {
@@ -879,9 +894,18 @@ static int do_tls_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname, sockptr_t optval,
rc = do_tls_setsockopt_no_pad(sk, optval, optlen);
break;
case TLS_TX_MAX_PAYLOAD_LEN:
+ /* Take tx_lock like the sendmsg paths do, the socket lock is
+ * dropped while a sender waits for memory, maybe with no record
+ * open. Senders sleep with tx_lock held, so take it interruptible.
+ */
+ ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
+ rc = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ctx->tx_lock);
+ if (rc)
+ break;
lock_sock(sk);
rc = do_tls_setsockopt_tx_payload_len(sk, optval, optlen);
release_sock(sk);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->tx_lock);
break;
default:
rc = -ENOPROTOOPT;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net v3] tls: fix the open record check in the max payload size setsockopt
2026-10-20 12:12 [PATCH net v3] tls: fix the open record check in the max payload size setsockopt Jiayuan Chen
@ 2026-10-20 12:18 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: netdev-bot+sinfo @ 2026-10-20 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiayuan Chen
Cc: netdev, sd, John Fastabend, Jakub Kicinski, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, Wilfred Mallawa,
linux-kernel
Hi!
This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
commit messages seem to be missing some information:
- Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
(e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.
Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
then.
The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
that is the case please reply and explain.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-20 12:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-20 12:12 [PATCH net v3] tls: fix the open record check in the max payload size setsockopt Jiayuan Chen
2026-10-20 12:18 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®