From: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
To: jiangshanlai@gmail.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
josh@joshtriplett.org, work@onurozkan.dev, frederic@kernel.org,
neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org, joelagnelf@nvidia.com,
boqun@kernel.org, urezki@gmail.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
qiang.zhang@linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>,
Kunwu Chan <chentao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] srcu: Detect duplicate callback enqueue at registration
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 18:18:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261023101841.2910719-8-kunwu.chan@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023101841.2910719-1-kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
Move the duplicate-callback check from srcu_do_enqueue() to
__call_srcu() entry so that detected duplicate registrations
are rejected before they reach the deferred-list enqueue path.
Report the callback address, function symbol, and object
information, rate-limited to the first three occurrences.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@kylinos.cn>
---
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 1993ddbdb828..3838d9fdf532 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/srcu.h>
@@ -1511,12 +1512,6 @@ static unsigned long srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp,
static void srcu_do_enqueue(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
rcu_callback_t func, bool do_norm)
{
- if (debug_rcu_head_queue(rhp)) {
- /* Probable double call_srcu(), so leak the callback. */
- WRITE_ONCE(rhp->func, srcu_leak_callback);
- WARN_ONCE(1, "call_srcu(): Leaked duplicate callback\n");
- return;
- }
rhp->func = func;
(void)srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp, rhp, do_norm);
}
@@ -1529,6 +1524,8 @@ static void srcu_do_enqueue(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
rcu_callback_t func, bool do_norm)
{
+ static atomic_t doublefrees;
+
/* Misaligned rcu_head! */
WARN_ON_ONCE((unsigned long)rhp & (sizeof(void *) - 1));
@@ -1539,6 +1536,16 @@ static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ssp->srcu_reader_flavor == SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ATOMIC))
return; // Leak the callback rather than corrupt SRCU state.
+ if (debug_rcu_head_queue(rhp)) {
+ if (atomic_inc_return(&doublefrees) < 4) {
+ pr_err("%s(): Duplicate call_srcu() CB %p->%pS()\n",
+ __func__, rhp, rhp->func);
+ mem_dump_obj(rhp);
+ }
+ WRITE_ONCE(rhp->func, srcu_leak_callback);
+ return;
+ }
+
/* Record the caller: the irq_work's stack says nothing about it. */
kasan_record_aux_stack(rhp);
@@ -1554,6 +1561,7 @@ static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
if (READ_ONCE(sndp->draining) && !in_nmi()) {
WARN_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU),
"call_srcu() re-entered during callback drain; leaking callback\n");
+ debug_rcu_head_unqueue(rhp);
return;
}
sdp = this_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 10:18 [PATCH 0/9] rcu: Improve callback diagnostics and validation Kunwu Chan
2026-10-23 10:18 ` [PATCH 1/9] srcu: Record callback registration stack for KASAN Kunwu Chan
2026-10-23 10:18 ` [PATCH 2/9] srcutiny: " Kunwu Chan
2026-10-23 10:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] rcu: Record callback registration stack for Tiny RCU Kunwu Chan
2026-10-23 10:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] srcu: Validate callback arguments Kunwu Chan
2026-10-23 10:18 ` [PATCH 5/9] rcu: Validate callback arguments in Tiny RCU Kunwu Chan
2026-10-23 10:18 ` [PATCH 6/9] rcu-tasks: Validate callback arguments Kunwu Chan
2026-10-23 10:18 ` Kunwu Chan [this message]
2026-10-23 10:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] srcutiny: Detect duplicate callback enqueue Kunwu Chan
2026-10-23 10:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] rcu-tasks: " Kunwu Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261023101841.2910719-8-kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--to=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=chentao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®