* [PATCH] s390/cert_store: Hold the keyring->sem while invalidating keys
@ 2026-10-24 14:42 Jarkko Sakkinen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2026-10-24 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik, Alexander Gordeev
Cc: David Howells, keyrings, Jarkko Sakkinen, Christian Borntraeger,
Sven Schnelle, Kees Cook, Ilya Leoshkevich, Anastasia Eskova,
Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, linux-kernel
invalidate_keyring_keys() does not hold keyring->sem while calling
keyring_read(), which is contrary to what keyring assumes from its callers,
and can lead to reoccuring bugs.
KEY_FLAG_KEEP alone does not e.g., protect from the following call path:
1. keyctl_keyring_move()
2. key_move()
3. __key_unlink()
Address the issue by guarding the critical section.
Fixes: 8cf57d7217c3 ("s390: add support for user-defined certificates")
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
---
This came up as a side product while working on assoc_array to
rhashtable migration and going through various callers of the keyring.
It's made by me but please keep in mind that I don't even have a
toolchain for s390 setup so it is based only on reading code and I have
not even compiled this.
Just wanted to clarify the background for this fix as I'm not a regular
contributor over here. If for any reason it turned out to be false
positive, I'm fine with that too.
arch/s390/kernel/cert_store.c | 17 +++++++++++------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/cert_store.c b/arch/s390/kernel/cert_store.c
index 998f2da56175..d35b1ea22507 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/cert_store.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/cert_store.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/keyctl.h>
#include <linux/kobject.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/sysfs.h>
@@ -320,13 +321,17 @@ static int invalidate_keyring_keys(struct key *keyring)
struct key *current_key;
int rc;
- keyring_payload_len = key_type_keyring.read(keyring, NULL, 0);
- num_keys = keyring_payload_len / sizeof(key_serial_t);
- key_array = kzalloc_objs(key_serial_t, num_keys);
- if (!key_array)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ scoped_guard(rwsem_read, &keyring->sem) {
+ keyring_payload_len = key_type_keyring.read(keyring, NULL, 0);
+ num_keys = keyring_payload_len / sizeof(key_serial_t);
+
+ key_array = kzalloc_objs(key_serial_t, num_keys);
+ if (!key_array)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ rc = key_type_keyring.read(keyring, (char *)key_array, keyring_payload_len);
+ }
- rc = key_type_keyring.read(keyring, (char *)key_array, keyring_payload_len);
if (rc != keyring_payload_len) {
pr_dbf_msg("Couldn't read keyring payload");
goto out;
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-10-24 14:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-24 14:42 [PATCH] s390/cert_store: Hold the keyring->sem while invalidating keys Jarkko Sakkinen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®