From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@mandelbit.com>
Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] lib/crypto: x86/chacha: Add 16-block AVX-512 implementation
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2026 17:35:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261026003510.GA1843@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025234758.3219829-1-antonio@mandelbit.com>
[+Cc Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>]
On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 12:47:53AM +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series adds a 16-block ChaCha implementation for x86 using 512-bit
> registers. It is preceded by a KUnit suite and benchmark for
> chacha_crypt(), as lib/crypto has none for plain ChaCha yet.
>
> Patch 1 stands on its own and passes with and without patch 2.
>
> On AMD Zen 5, the new code doubles chacha_crypt() throughput for inputs
> of 1 KiB and more, from about 5.2 GB/s to about 10.2 GB/s. It came out
> of work on the OpenVPN data channel offload driver (ovpn), whose
> ChaCha20-Poly1305 throughput is CPU-bound: in a VM benchmark it gained
> about 10% at a 1500-byte MTU and 35% at 9000.
>
> iPlease note that I could only measure Zen 5.
> The new code is not used on the CPUs setting X86_FEATURE_PREFER_YMM
> (Skylake-X, Ice Lake and Tiger Lake), but it is on
> Rocket Lake, Sapphire Rapids and later, and on Zen 4, where 512-bit
> operations are split into two halves. Numbers from any of those would be
> very welcome.
Can you clarify how your AVX-512 implementation differs from
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20260722153247.630519-1-martin@strongswan.org/
? See also the feedback I left on it here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20260722232424.GA50619@quark/
That applies to this one too, it looks like.
Side note: "Zen 5" needs clarification. The vector execution units
aren't as wide on the Zen 5 mobile processors as on Zen 5 desktop and
server. Probably your numbers apply to desktop and server only. (I've
made that mistake in the past before, but they are indeed different.)
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-25 23:47 Antonio Quartulli
2026-10-25 23:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] lib/crypto: tests: Add KUnit tests and benchmark for ChaCha Antonio Quartulli
2026-10-27 1:53 ` Eric Biggers
2026-10-27 8:51 ` Antonio Quartulli
2026-10-25 23:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] lib/crypto: x86/chacha: Add 16-block AVX-512 (zmm) implementation Antonio Quartulli
2026-10-26 0:35 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-10-26 0:46 ` [PATCH 0/2] lib/crypto: x86/chacha: Add 16-block AVX-512 implementation Antonio Quartulli
2026-10-26 18:36 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261026003510.GA1843@sol \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=antonio@mandelbit.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@strongswan.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®