From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Vladimir Vdovin <deliran@verdict.gg>,
Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
David Dai <david.dai@linux.dev>, Emil Tsalapatis <etsal@meta.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
Lee Trager <ltrager@nvidia.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] sched/numa: Leave the placement of a BPF-scheduled task to its scheduler
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 05:13:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261027041536.3317971-3-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027041536.3317971-1-arighi@nvidia.com>
A task under a BPF scheduler can take NUMA hinting faults via
task_numa_fault() and then reach numa_migrate_preferred(), which may
migrate the task to its preferred node through task_numa_migrate().
The migration of such a task should always be driven by its BPF
scheduler, which owns the placement of its tasks.
Keep collecting the statistics, which is what makes
p->numa_preferred_nid worth reading, but skip the migration for a task
owned by a BPF scheduler. The scheduler can read the preferred node and
decide for itself whether moving the task is worth the cost.
For the same reason, never pick a task owned by a BPF scheduler as the
swap partner of another task that NUMA balancing migrates, e.g., a fair
task when the BPF scheduler runs in partial mode. Such a task is
treated like a kthread on the destination CPU: the migrating task can
still move there alone, but the BPF-scheduled task is left in place.
Reported-by: Vladimir Vdovin <deliran@verdict.gg>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261002124559.10367-1-deliran@verdict.gg
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 36df9a4dde534..5064c7b707f4d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3267,8 +3267,13 @@ static bool task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env,
rcu_read_lock();
cur = rcu_dereference_all(dst_rq->curr);
+ /*
+ * Never pick a task under a BPF scheduler as the swap partner: its
+ * placement is left to that scheduler, see numa_migrate_preferred().
+ * Moving the faulting task alone to the destination is still allowed.
+ */
if (cur && ((cur->flags & (PF_EXITING | PF_KTHREAD)) ||
- !cur->mm))
+ !cur->mm || task_on_scx(cur)))
cur = NULL;
/*
@@ -3645,6 +3650,14 @@ static void numa_migrate_preferred(struct task_struct *p)
if (task_node(p) == p->numa_preferred_nid)
return;
+ /*
+ * A task under a BPF scheduler is placed by that scheduler. Keep the
+ * statistics coming, which is what makes p->numa_preferred_nid worth
+ * reading, but leave the placement alone.
+ */
+ if (task_on_scx(p))
+ return;
+
/* Otherwise, try migrate to a CPU on the preferred node */
task_numa_migrate(p);
}
--
2.56.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 4:13 [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.5] sched_ext: Add NUMA balancing support Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 4:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched/numa: Let other scheduling classes drive NUMA scanning Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 4:13 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-10-27 5:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched/numa: Leave the placement of a BPF-scheduled task to its scheduler K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-27 6:43 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 9:00 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-27 9:30 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 10:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-27 11:09 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-27 4:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched/numa: Notify the scheduling class of preferred node changes Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 5:30 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-27 6:34 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 8:02 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-27 4:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched_ext: Report preferred NUMA nodes through ops.set_numa_node() Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-27 11:14 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 4:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched_ext: Add a kfunc to read a task's preferred NUMA node Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 6:12 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-27 6:57 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 10:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-27 11:21 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-27 4:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] selftests/sched_ext: Test preferred NUMA node notifications Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 10:52 ` [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.5] sched_ext: Add NUMA balancing support Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-27 11:38 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-27 11:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261027041536.3317971-3-arighi@nvidia.com \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=david.dai@linux.dev \
--cc=deliran@verdict.gg \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=etsal@meta.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltrager@nvidia.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®