* [PATCH v5] iio: adc: pac1934: validate ACPI _DSM return type and bounds
@ 2026-10-30 12:35 Tristan Madani
2026-10-30 16:32 ` Marius.Cristea
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Madani @ 2026-10-30 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marius Cristea, Jonathan Cameron
Cc: David Lechner, Nuno Sa, Andy Shevchenko, linux-iio, linux-kernel,
Tristan Madani
From: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
pac1934_acpi_parse_channel_config() calls acpi_evaluate_dsm() four
times to read channel configuration but does not validate the returned
object type or array bounds:
1. No check that the returned object is ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE. If
firmware returns a different type, accessing rez->package.count
and rez->package.elements on a non-package object produces
unpredictable values.
2. The loop bounds use rez->package.count directly without capping
to PAC1934_MAX_NUM_CHANNELS (4). A package with more elements
than expected causes writes past the fixed-size labels[],
shunts[], and active_channels[] arrays.
3. The bipolar and sample rate DSM calls access elements[0] without
verifying package.count >= 1.
Use acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() with ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE to validate the
return type at evaluation time. Cap loop iterations to
PAC1934_MAX_NUM_CHANNELS, and verify package count >= 1 before
accessing elements[0].
Signed-off-by: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
---
Changes in v5:
- Keep existing declaration order, only add new 'count' variable, per
Andy Shevchenko
- Replace (count & ~1u) with min_t() cap and i + 1 < count loop bound
to avoid unsigned literal question, per Andy Shevchenko
Changes in v4:
- Reorder variable declarations to reverse xmas tree, per Andy Shevchenko
- Drop casts from min() parameters, per Andy Shevchenko
Changes in v3:
- Use acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() instead of manual type checks, per
Andy Shevchenko
- Use (count & ~1u) for the name+mohm loop bound to ensure pairs
are complete, per Andy Shevchenko
- Drop Fixes: and Cc: stable tags since this is hardening rather
than a fix for a specific regression, per Jonathan Cameron
drivers/iio/adc/pac1934.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/pac1934.c b/drivers/iio/adc/pac1934.c
index de59dc27c4405..cdb730217d46c 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/pac1934.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/pac1934.c
@@ -1091,6 +1091,7 @@ static int pac1934_acpi_parse_channel_config(struct i2c_client *client,
union acpi_object *rez;
struct device *dev = &client->dev;
unsigned short bi_dir_mask;
+ unsigned int count;
int idx, i;
guid_t guid;
@@ -1098,11 +1099,15 @@ static int pac1934_acpi_parse_channel_config(struct i2c_client *client,
guid_parse(PAC1934_DSM_UUID, &guid);
- rez = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, &guid, 0, PAC1934_ACPI_GET_NAMES_AND_MOHMS_VALS, NULL);
+ rez = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &guid, 0,
+ PAC1934_ACPI_GET_NAMES_AND_MOHMS_VALS,
+ NULL, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
if (!rez)
return -EINVAL;
- for (i = 0; i < rez->package.count; i += 2) {
+ count = min_t(unsigned int, rez->package.count,
+ PAC1934_MAX_NUM_CHANNELS * 2);
+ for (i = 0; i + 1 < count; i += 2) {
idx = i / 2;
info->labels[idx] =
devm_kmemdup(dev, rez->package.elements[i].string.pointer,
@@ -1119,7 +1124,9 @@ static int pac1934_acpi_parse_channel_config(struct i2c_client *client,
ACPI_FREE(rez);
- rez = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, &guid, 1, PAC1934_ACPI_GET_UOHMS_VALS, NULL);
+ rez = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &guid, 1,
+ PAC1934_ACPI_GET_UOHMS_VALS,
+ NULL, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
if (!rez) {
/*
* initializing with default values
@@ -1130,7 +1137,9 @@ static int pac1934_acpi_parse_channel_config(struct i2c_client *client,
return 0;
}
- for (i = 0; i < rez->package.count; i++) {
+ count = min_t(unsigned int, rez->package.count,
+ PAC1934_MAX_NUM_CHANNELS);
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
idx = i;
info->shunts[idx] = rez->package.elements[i].integer.value;
info->active_channels[idx] = (info->shunts[idx] != 0);
@@ -1138,9 +1147,15 @@ static int pac1934_acpi_parse_channel_config(struct i2c_client *client,
ACPI_FREE(rez);
- rez = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, &guid, 1, PAC1934_ACPI_GET_BIPOLAR_SETTINGS, NULL);
+ rez = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &guid, 1,
+ PAC1934_ACPI_GET_BIPOLAR_SETTINGS,
+ NULL, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
if (!rez)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (rez->package.count < 1) {
+ ACPI_FREE(rez);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
bi_dir_mask = rez->package.elements[0].integer.value;
info->bi_dir[0] = ((bi_dir_mask & (1 << 3)) | (bi_dir_mask & (1 << 7))) != 0;
@@ -1150,9 +1165,15 @@ static int pac1934_acpi_parse_channel_config(struct i2c_client *client,
ACPI_FREE(rez);
- rez = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, &guid, 1, PAC1934_ACPI_GET_SAMP, NULL);
+ rez = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &guid, 1,
+ PAC1934_ACPI_GET_SAMP,
+ NULL, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
if (!rez)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (rez->package.count < 1) {
+ ACPI_FREE(rez);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
info->sample_rate_value = rez->package.elements[0].integer.value;
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] iio: adc: pac1934: validate ACPI _DSM return type and bounds
2026-10-30 12:35 [PATCH v5] iio: adc: pac1934: validate ACPI _DSM return type and bounds Tristan Madani
@ 2026-10-30 16:32 ` Marius.Cristea
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marius.Cristea @ 2026-10-30 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tristmd, jic23; +Cc: tristan, nuno.sa, dlechner, linux-iio, andy, linux-kernel
On Fri, 2026-10-30 at 12:35 +0000, Tristan Madani wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
>
> From: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
>
> pac1934_acpi_parse_channel_config() calls acpi_evaluate_dsm() four
> times to read channel configuration but does not validate the
> returned
> object type or array bounds:
>
> 1. No check that the returned object is ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE. If
> firmware returns a different type, accessing rez->package.count
> and rez->package.elements on a non-package object produces
> unpredictable values.
>
> 2. The loop bounds use rez->package.count directly without capping
> to PAC1934_MAX_NUM_CHANNELS (4). A package with more elements
> than expected causes writes past the fixed-size labels[],
> shunts[], and active_channels[] arrays.
>
> 3. The bipolar and sample rate DSM calls access elements[0] without
> verifying package.count >= 1.
>
> Use acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() with ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE to validate the
> return type at evaluation time. Cap loop iterations to
> PAC1934_MAX_NUM_CHANNELS, and verify package count >= 1 before
> accessing elements[0].
>
> Signed-off-by: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - Keep existing declaration order, only add new 'count' variable, per
> Andy Shevchenko
> - Replace (count & ~1u) with min_t() cap and i + 1 < count loop bound
> to avoid unsigned literal question, per Andy Shevchenko
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Reorder variable declarations to reverse xmas tree, per Andy
> Shevchenko
> - Drop casts from min() parameters, per Andy Shevchenko
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Use acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() instead of manual type checks, per
> Andy Shevchenko
> - Use (count & ~1u) for the name+mohm loop bound to ensure pairs
> are complete, per Andy Shevchenko
> - Drop Fixes: and Cc: stable tags since this is hardening rather
> than a fix for a specific regression, per Jonathan Cameron
> drivers/iio/adc/pac1934.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Marius Cristea <marius.cristea@microchip.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-30 16:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-30 12:35 [PATCH v5] iio: adc: pac1934: validate ACPI _DSM return type and bounds Tristan Madani
2026-10-30 16:32 ` Marius.Cristea
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®