mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutn?" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
	Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>,
	Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH -v4 19/22] cpuset: introduce validate_remote_partition
Date: Sun,  1 Nov 2026 19:42:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261101114206.2434398-20-ridong.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261101114206.2434398-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev>

From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>

This introduces validate_remote_partition() to consolidate validation
logic for remote partition operations. It is used by both
remote_partition_enable() and remote_cpus_update().

The new function performs the following checks:
1. Empty check: the new effective exclusive CPUs must not be empty.
2. Privilege requirement: only CAP_SYS_ADMIN can add CPUs to a
   remote partition.
3. Online check: a new remote partition must have at least one
   active CPU. An existing remote partition is allowed to have all
   its CPUs offline, the same as before.
4. Resource check: the added CPUs can't use up all the top cpuset's
   effective CPUs, and must not be in any existing sub-partitions.
5. Common partition validation via validate_partition(), including
   the housekeeping conflict and tasks_nocpu_error() checks.

As a result, remote_cpus_update() reports PERR_INVCPUS instead of
PERR_NOCPUS when the added CPUs would use up the top cpuset's effective
CPUs, and checks housekeeping conflicts even when no CPU is added.

Additionally, remote_partition_disable() takes the partition error as
a parameter so that cs->prs_err can be updated centrally by
partition_disable(), instead of being written by each caller
beforehand.

Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
---
 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index ecb7fd378a3f..1ff5f9e4c2fb 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -1837,6 +1837,51 @@ static void partition_update(struct cpuset *cs, int prs, struct cpumask *xcpus,
 	cpuset_force_rebuild();
 }
 
+/**
+ * validate_remote_partition - Validate for remote partition
+ * @cs: Target cpuset to validate
+ * @new_prs: New partition root state to validate
+ * @excpus: New exclusive effective CPUs mask to validate
+ * @add: exclusive CPUs to be added
+ * @del: exclusive CPUs to be deleted, can be NULL
+ *
+ * Return: PERR_NONE if validation passes, appropriate error code otherwise
+ */
+static enum prs_errcode validate_remote_partition(struct cpuset *cs,
+	int new_prs, struct cpumask *excpus, struct cpumask *add, struct cpumask *del)
+{
+	if (cpumask_empty(excpus))
+		return PERR_CPUSEMPTY;
+
+	/*
+	 * The user must have sysadmin privilege.
+	 */
+	if (!cpumask_empty(add) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+		return PERR_ACCESS;
+
+	/*
+	 * The effective_xcpus mask can contain offline CPUs, but there must
+	 * be at least one or more online CPUs present before it can be enabled.
+	 */
+	if (!is_remote_partition(cs) &&
+	    !cpumask_intersects(excpus, cpu_active_mask))
+		return PERR_INVCPUS;
+
+	/*
+	 * Additions of remote CPUs is only allowed if those CPUs are
+	 * not allocated to other partitions and there are effective_cpus
+	 * left in the top cpuset.
+	 */
+	if (!cpumask_empty(add)) {
+		if (cpumask_subset(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, add))
+			return PERR_INVCPUS;
+		if (cpumask_intersects(add, subpartitions_cpus))
+			return PERR_NOCPUS;
+	}
+
+	return validate_partition(cs, NULL, new_prs, excpus, del);
+}
+
 /*
  * remote_partition_enable - Enable current cpuset as a remote partition root
  * @cs: the cpuset to update
@@ -1850,30 +1895,17 @@ static void partition_update(struct cpuset *cs, int prs, struct cpumask *xcpus,
 static int remote_partition_enable(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs,
 				   struct tmpmasks *tmp)
 {
-	/*
-	 * The user must have sysadmin privilege.
-	 */
-	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
-		return PERR_ACCESS;
+	enum prs_errcode err;
 
 	/*
-	 * The requested exclusive_cpus must not be allocated to other
-	 * partitions and it can't use up all the root's effective_cpus.
-	 *
-	 * The effective_xcpus mask can contain offline CPUs, but there must
-	 * be at least one or more online CPUs present before it can be enabled.
-	 *
 	 * Note that creating a remote partition with any local partition root
 	 * above it or remote partition root underneath it is not allowed.
 	 */
 	compute_excpus(cs, tmp->new_cpus);
-	if (!cpumask_intersects(tmp->new_cpus, cpu_active_mask) ||
-	    cpumask_subset(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, tmp->new_cpus))
-		return PERR_INVCPUS;
-	if (cpumask_intersects(tmp->new_cpus, subpartitions_cpus))
-		return PERR_NOCPUS;
-	if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(new_prs, PRS_ROOT, tmp->new_cpus, NULL))
-		return PERR_HKEEPING;
+	err = validate_remote_partition(cs, new_prs, tmp->new_cpus,
+					tmp->new_cpus, NULL);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	partition_enable(cs, NULL, new_prs, tmp->new_cpus);
 	/*
@@ -1887,13 +1919,15 @@ static int remote_partition_enable(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs,
 /*
  * remote_partition_disable - Remove current cpuset from remote partition list
  * @cs: the cpuset to update
+ * @prs_err: partition error, PERR_NONE when switching back to member
  * @tmp: temporary masks
  *
  * The effective_cpus is also updated.
  *
  * cpuset_mutex must be held by the caller.
  */
-static void remote_partition_disable(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
+static void remote_partition_disable(struct cpuset *cs,
+		enum prs_errcode prs_err, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
 {
 	int new_prs;
 
@@ -1907,8 +1941,8 @@ static void remote_partition_disable(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_subset(cs->effective_xcpus, subpartitions_cpus) &&
 		     !cpumask_empty(subpartitions_cpus));
 
-	new_prs = cs->prs_err ? -cs->partition_root_state : PRS_MEMBER;
-	partition_disable(cs, NULL, new_prs, cs->prs_err);
+	new_prs = prs_err ? -cs->partition_root_state : PRS_MEMBER;
+	partition_disable(cs, NULL, new_prs, prs_err);
 
 	/*
 	 * Propagate changes in top_cpuset's effective_cpus down the hierarchy.
@@ -1931,37 +1965,20 @@ static void remote_cpus_update(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *xcpus,
 			       struct cpumask *excpus, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
 {
 	int prs = cs->partition_root_state;
+	enum prs_errcode err;
 
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_remote_partition(cs)))
 		return;
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_subset(cs->effective_xcpus, subpartitions_cpus));
-
-	if (cpumask_empty(excpus)) {
-		WRITE_ONCE(cs->prs_err, PERR_CPUSEMPTY);
-		goto invalidate;
-	}
-
 	cpumask_andnot(tmp->addmask, excpus, cs->effective_xcpus);
 	cpumask_andnot(tmp->delmask, cs->effective_xcpus, excpus);
 
-	/*
-	 * Additions of remote CPUs is only allowed if those CPUs are
-	 * not allocated to other partitions and there are effective_cpus
-	 * left in the top cpuset.
-	 */
-	if (!cpumask_empty(tmp->addmask)) {
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_intersects(tmp->addmask, subpartitions_cpus));
-		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
-			WRITE_ONCE(cs->prs_err, PERR_ACCESS);
-		else if (cpumask_intersects(tmp->addmask, subpartitions_cpus) ||
-			 cpumask_subset(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, tmp->addmask))
-			WRITE_ONCE(cs->prs_err, PERR_NOCPUS);
-		else if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(prs, PRS_ROOT,
-						       excpus, tmp->delmask))
-			WRITE_ONCE(cs->prs_err, PERR_HKEEPING);
-		if (cs->prs_err)
-			goto invalidate;
+	err = validate_remote_partition(cs, prs, excpus, tmp->addmask,
+					tmp->delmask);
+	if (err) {
+		remote_partition_disable(cs, err, tmp);
+		return;
 	}
 
 	cs->remote_partition_updating = true;
@@ -1972,10 +1989,6 @@ static void remote_cpus_update(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *xcpus,
 	cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask(&top_cpuset, tmp->new_cpus);
 	update_sibling_cpumasks(&top_cpuset, NULL, tmp);
 	cs->remote_partition_updating = false;
-	return;
-
-invalidate:
-	remote_partition_disable(cs, tmp);
 }
 
 static bool is_user_xcpus_exclusive(struct cpuset *cs)
@@ -2471,14 +2484,12 @@ static void partition_cpus_change(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
 
 	prs_err = validate_partition(cs, parent, trialcs->partition_root_state,
 				     trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp->delmask);
-	if (prs_err) {
-		WRITE_ONCE(cs->prs_err, prs_err);
+	if (prs_err)
 		trialcs->prs_err = prs_err;
-	}
 
 	if (is_remote_partition(cs)) {
 		if (trialcs->prs_err)
-			remote_partition_disable(cs, tmp);
+			remote_partition_disable(cs, trialcs->prs_err, tmp);
 		else
 			remote_cpus_update(cs, trialcs->exclusive_cpus,
 					   trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp);
@@ -2982,7 +2993,7 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
 
 	if (disable_partition) {
 		if (is_remote_partition(cs))
-			remote_partition_disable(cs, &tmpmask);
+			remote_partition_disable(cs, PERR_NONE, &tmpmask);
 		else
 			local_partition_disable(cs, PERR_NONE, &tmpmask);
 		/*
@@ -3928,8 +3939,7 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
 		if (cpumask_empty(subpartitions_cpus) ||
 		    (cpumask_empty(&new_cpus) &&
 		     partition_is_populated(cs, NULL))) {
-			WRITE_ONCE(cs->prs_err, PERR_HOTPLUG);
-			remote_partition_disable(cs, tmp);
+			remote_partition_disable(cs, PERR_HOTPLUG, tmp);
 			compute_effective_cpumask(&new_cpus, cs, parent);
 		}
 		goto update_tasks;
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-01 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-01 11:41 [RFC PATCH -v4 00/22] cpuset: rework local partition logic Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 01/22] cpuset: add early empty cpumask check in partition_xcpus_add/del Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 02/22] cpuset: settle isolation state when CPUs are given back to parent Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 03/22] cpuset: generalize the validate_partition() interface Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 04/22] cpuset: introduce partition_enable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 05/22] cpuset: introduce partition_disable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 06/22] cpuset: introduce partition_update() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 07/22] cpuset: use partition_enable() for remote partition enablement Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 08/22] cpuset: use partition_disable() for remote partition disablement Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 09/22] cpuset: use partition_update() for remote partition update Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 10/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_enable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 11/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_disable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 12/22] cpuset: use local_partition_disable() to invalidate local partition Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 13/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_update() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 14/22] cpuset: remove update_parent_effective_cpumask Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 15/22] cpuset: remove redundant partition field updates Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 16/22] cpuset: simplify partition update logic for hotplug tasks Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 17/22] cpuset: use partition_disable for compute_partition_effective_cpumask Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 18/22] cpuset: use validate_local_partition in local_partition_enable Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 20/22] cpuset: simplify the update_prstate() function Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 21/22] cpuset: remove prs_err clear when notify_partition_change Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 22/22] cpuset: remove unnecessary validation in partition_cpus_change Ridong Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261101114206.2434398-20-ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
    --cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®