From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutn?" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>,
Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH -v4 22/22] cpuset: remove unnecessary validation in partition_cpus_change
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2026 19:42:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261101114206.2434398-23-ridong.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261101114206.2434398-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev>
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
When user-configured CPUs (including cpuset.cpus and cpuset.cpus.exclusive)
are modified, the partition may either be disabled or updated. Both local
and remote partitions update can fully validate their own validity: if the
validation fails, the partition will be disabled. Therefore, the
validation in partition_cpus_change is redundant and can be removed.
With that, trialcs->prs_err is never set, so remove its error branches
in partition_cpus_change() and its initialization in update_cpumask()
and update_exclusive_cpumask().
Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 40 +++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 4fd8b0025a5a..e710e7236922 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -2459,43 +2459,15 @@ static int parse_cpuset_cpulist(const char *buf, struct cpumask *out_mask)
static void partition_cpus_change(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
struct tmpmasks *tmp)
{
- enum prs_errcode prs_err;
- struct cpuset *parent = is_remote_partition(cs) ? NULL : parent_cs(cs);
-
if (cs_is_member(cs))
return;
- /*
- * Check for housekeeping conflict by passing the whole
- * effective_xcpus as well as those CPUs that are to be
- * removed from cs as delmask.
- */
- if (is_partition_valid(cs))
- cpumask_andnot(tmp->delmask, cs->effective_xcpus,
- trialcs->effective_xcpus);
+ if (is_remote_partition(cs))
+ remote_cpus_update(cs, trialcs->exclusive_cpus,
+ trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp);
else
- cpumask_clear(tmp->delmask);
-
- prs_err = validate_partition(cs, parent, trialcs->partition_root_state,
- trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp->delmask);
- if (prs_err)
- trialcs->prs_err = prs_err;
-
- if (is_remote_partition(cs)) {
- if (trialcs->prs_err)
- remote_partition_disable(cs, -cs->partition_root_state,
- trialcs->prs_err, tmp);
- else
- remote_cpus_update(cs, trialcs->exclusive_cpus,
- trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp);
- } else {
- if (trialcs->prs_err)
- local_partition_disable(cs, -cs->partition_root_state,
- trialcs->prs_err, tmp);
- else
- __local_partition_update(cs, trialcs->exclusive_cpus,
- trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp, false);
- }
+ __local_partition_update(cs, trialcs->exclusive_cpus,
+ trialcs->effective_xcpus, tmp, false);
}
/**
@@ -2521,7 +2493,6 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
return 0;
compute_trialcs_excpus(trialcs, cs);
- trialcs->prs_err = PERR_NONE;
retval = validate_change(cs, trialcs);
if (retval < 0)
@@ -2597,7 +2568,6 @@ static int update_exclusive_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
if (alloc_tmpmasks(&tmp))
return -ENOMEM;
- trialcs->prs_err = PERR_NONE;
partition_cpus_change(cs, trialcs, &tmp);
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
--
2.34.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-01 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-01 11:41 [RFC PATCH -v4 00/22] cpuset: rework local partition logic Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 01/22] cpuset: add early empty cpumask check in partition_xcpus_add/del Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 02/22] cpuset: settle isolation state when CPUs are given back to parent Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 03/22] cpuset: generalize the validate_partition() interface Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 04/22] cpuset: introduce partition_enable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 05/22] cpuset: introduce partition_disable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 06/22] cpuset: introduce partition_update() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 07/22] cpuset: use partition_enable() for remote partition enablement Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 08/22] cpuset: use partition_disable() for remote partition disablement Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 09/22] cpuset: use partition_update() for remote partition update Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 10/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_enable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 11/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_disable() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 12/22] cpuset: use local_partition_disable() to invalidate local partition Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 13/22] cpuset: introduce local_partition_update() Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 14/22] cpuset: remove update_parent_effective_cpumask Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 15/22] cpuset: remove redundant partition field updates Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 16/22] cpuset: simplify partition update logic for hotplug tasks Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 17/22] cpuset: use partition_disable for compute_partition_effective_cpumask Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 18/22] cpuset: use validate_local_partition in local_partition_enable Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 19/22] cpuset: introduce validate_remote_partition Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 20/22] cpuset: simplify the update_prstate() function Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH -v4 21/22] cpuset: remove prs_err clear when notify_partition_change Ridong Chen
2026-11-01 11:42 ` Ridong Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261101114206.2434398-23-ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®