mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ieee802154: nl-mac: validate device pointers before dereference
@ 2026-11-01  9:22 Kalpesh Solanki
  2026-11-01 19:43 ` Andrew Lunn
  2026-11-02  2:47 ` Kalpesh Solanki
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kalpesh Solanki @ 2026-11-01  9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.aring, stefan, miquel.raynal, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni
  Cc: horms, linux-wpan, netdev, linux-kernel,
	syzbot+9ea34da5ca6100593c90, Kalpesh Solanki, stable

A virtual network device (such as a TUN interface) can have its link
type set to ARPHRD_IEEE802154 via ioctl(tun_fd, TUNSETLINK,
ARPHRD_IEEE802154). However, such devices do not have an IEEE 802.15.4
private context allocated (dev->ieee802154_ptr is NULL) and do not
register MAC operations (dev->ml_priv / ieee802154_mlme_ops(dev) is NULL).

When dumping security keys via IEEE802154_LLSEC_LIST_KEY,
ieee802154_llsec_dump_table() iterates through all net devices and
dereferences data.ops->llsec assuming that any ARPHRD_IEEE802154 device
has valid mlme ops. Because data.ops is NULL, this causes an immediate
null-pointer dereference / General Protection Fault:

  Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
  KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000038-0x000000000000003f]
  RIP: 0010:ieee802154_llsec_dump_table+0x204/0x5d0
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   genl_dumpit+0x125/0x230 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1026
   netlink_dump+0x53b/0xd00 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2351
   __netlink_dump_start+0x6d6/0x990 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2466

Similarly, ieee802154_dump_iface() and ieee802154_nl_get_dev() assume
that ARPHRD_IEEE802154 devices have valid dev->ieee802154_ptr and
ieee802154_mlme_ops(dev) pointers.

Fix this by ensuring dev->ieee802154_ptr and ieee802154_mlme_ops(dev)
are non-NULL before proceeding in ieee802154_nl_get_dev(),
ieee802154_dump_iface(), and ieee802154_llsec_dump_table().

Fixes: 3e9c156e2c21 ("ieee802154: add netlink interfaces for llsec")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+9ea34da5ca6100593c90@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9ea34da5ca6100593c90
Tested-by: syzbot+9ea34da5ca6100593c90@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kalpesh Solanki <skalpesh942@gmail.com>
---
 net/ieee802154/nl-mac.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ieee802154/nl-mac.c b/net/ieee802154/nl-mac.c
index 74ef0a310af..1acde5af4b5 100644
--- a/net/ieee802154/nl-mac.c
+++ b/net/ieee802154/nl-mac.c
@@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ static struct net_device *ieee802154_nl_get_dev(struct genl_info *info)
 	if (!dev)
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (dev->type != ARPHRD_IEEE802154) {
+	if (dev->type != ARPHRD_IEEE802154 || !dev->ieee802154_ptr ||
+	    !ieee802154_mlme_ops(dev)) {
 		dev_put(dev);
 		return NULL;
 	}
@@ -437,7 +438,8 @@ int ieee802154_dump_iface(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 
 	idx = 0;
 	for_each_netdev(net, dev) {
-		if (idx < s_idx || dev->type != ARPHRD_IEEE802154)
+		if (idx < s_idx || dev->type != ARPHRD_IEEE802154 ||
+		    !dev->ieee802154_ptr || !ieee802154_mlme_ops(dev))
 			goto cont;
 
 		if (ieee802154_nl_fill_iface(skb, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
@@ -771,7 +773,8 @@ ieee802154_llsec_dump_table(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
 	int rc;
 
 	for_each_netdev(net, dev) {
-		if (idx < first_dev || dev->type != ARPHRD_IEEE802154)
+		if (idx < first_dev || dev->type != ARPHRD_IEEE802154 ||
+		    !dev->ieee802154_ptr || !ieee802154_mlme_ops(dev))
 			goto skip;
 
 		data.ops = ieee802154_mlme_ops(dev);
-- 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ieee802154: nl-mac: validate device pointers before dereference
  2026-11-01  9:22 [PATCH] ieee802154: nl-mac: validate device pointers before dereference Kalpesh Solanki
@ 2026-11-01 19:43 ` Andrew Lunn
  2026-11-02  2:47 ` Kalpesh Solanki
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2026-11-01 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kalpesh Solanki
  Cc: alex.aring, stefan, miquel.raynal, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
	horms, linux-wpan, netdev, linux-kernel,
	syzbot+9ea34da5ca6100593c90, stable

On Sun, Nov 01, 2026 at 02:52:19PM +0530, Kalpesh Solanki wrote:
> A virtual network device (such as a TUN interface) can have its link
> type set to ARPHRD_IEEE802154 via ioctl(tun_fd, TUNSETLINK,
> ARPHRD_IEEE802154). However, such devices do not have an IEEE 802.15.4
> private context allocated (dev->ieee802154_ptr is NULL) and do not
> register MAC operations (dev->ml_priv / ieee802154_mlme_ops(dev) is NULL).

> Fix this by ensuring dev->ieee802154_ptr and ieee802154_mlme_ops(dev)
> are non-NULL before proceeding in ieee802154_nl_get_dev(),
> ieee802154_dump_iface(), and ieee802154_llsec_dump_table().

Did you consider the other fix? Is there a use case for setting a TUN
interface to ARPHRD_IEEE802154? If not, maybe return EOPNOTSUPP, or
EINVAL?

	Andrew


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ieee802154: nl-mac: validate device pointers before dereference
  2026-11-01  9:22 [PATCH] ieee802154: nl-mac: validate device pointers before dereference Kalpesh Solanki
  2026-11-01 19:43 ` Andrew Lunn
@ 2026-11-02  2:47 ` Kalpesh Solanki
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kalpesh Solanki @ 2026-11-02  2:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: andrew
  Cc: alex.aring, stefan, miquel.raynal, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
	horms, linux-wpan, netdev, linux-kernel,
	syzbot+9ea34da5ca6100593c90, stable, Kalpesh Solanki

On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 01:13:xx +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Did you consider the other fix? Is there a use case for setting a TUN
> interface to ARPHRD_IEEE802154? If not, maybe return EOPNOTSUPP, or
> EINVAL?
> 
> Andrew

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for reviewing and raising this point!

Regarding whether there is a use case for setting a TUN interface to
ARPHRD_IEEE802154:
In real hardware/subsystem usage, virtual 802.15.4 interfaces are typically
handled via mac802154_hwsim or fakelb (which properly allocate wpan_phy and
dev->ieee802154_ptr), rather than raw TUN. However, tun.c explicitly recognizes
ARPHRD_IEEE802154 and ARPHRD_IEEE802154_MONITOR in tun_get_addr_len():

	case ARPHRD_IEEE802154:
	case ARPHRD_IEEE802154_MONITOR:
		return IEEE802154_EXTENDED_ADDR_LEN;

which sets the hardware address length to IEEE802154_EXTENDED_ADDR_LEN on
TUNSETLINK for userspace network stacks/simulators (such as IoT testbeds or
custom TAP-based emulators) that expect 802.15.4 addressing.

Regarding fixing this in drivers/net/tun.c vs net/ieee802154/nl-mac.c:
We considered returning -EOPNOTSUPP / -EINVAL in TUNSETLINK, but chose to
guard nl-mac.c for the following reasons:

1. Subsystem robustness / Defense-in-depth:
   ieee802154_llsec_dump_table(), ieee802154_dump_iface(), and
   ieee802154_nl_get_dev() assumed that any netdevice in the namespace
   with dev->type == ARPHRD_IEEE802154 has valid ieee802154_ptr and
   mlme_ops. When that assumption fails, it triggers a NULL dereference
   while holding genl_mutex, leaving the mutex permanently locked and
   deadlocking generic netlink system-wide for unprivileged users.

   Other parts of the ieee802154 subsystem already make this defensive check:
   - net/ieee802154/6lowpan/core.c (lowpan_newlink):
       if (wdev->type != ARPHRD_IEEE802154 || !wdev->ieee802154_ptr)
   - net/ieee802154/socket.c:
       if (dev->type == ARPHRD_IEEE802154 && dev->ieee802154_ptr && ...)

   Guarding nl-mac.c ensures the IEEE 802.15.4 netlink handlers are safe
   regardless of how an ARPHRD_IEEE802154 device was created or modified.

2. Userspace ABI compatibility:
   TUNSETLINK has historically permitted arbitrary link types on down
   interfaces, and explicitly supports ARPHRD_IEEE802154 address lengths.
   Disallowing it in TUNSETLINK might break existing user tools or test
   frameworks that use TAP/TUN with this link type.

That said, if the consensus is that TUNSETLINK should reject
ARPHRD_IEEE802154 (or arbitrary link types that lack driver backend support),
I would be more than happy to submit a follow-up patch for tun.c as well.

Do you think we should reject it in tun.c in addition to guarding nl-mac.c,
or do you prefer restricting TUNSETLINK instead?

Thanks,
Kalpesh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-02  2:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-01  9:22 [PATCH] ieee802154: nl-mac: validate device pointers before dereference Kalpesh Solanki
2026-11-01 19:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-11-02  2:47 ` Kalpesh Solanki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®