mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Ximo <lixicaicai@gmail.com>
To: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Wang Haoran <haoranwangsec@gmail.com>,
	Li Ximo <lixicaicai@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] thermal/drivers/rcar_thermal: fail probe when no sensors are probed
Date: Tue,  3 Nov 2026 16:46:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261103084604.700540-1-lixicaicai@gmail.com> (raw)

From: Wang Haoran <haoranwangsec@gmail.com>

rcar_thermal_probe() returns success even when zero sensors were probed
(the per-sensor loop simply falls through with i == 0), leaving
common->head empty. rcar_thermal_suspend()/rcar_thermal_resume() then
call list_first_entry(&common->head, ...) unconditionally, and
list_first_entry() on an empty list does not return NULL: it returns
container_of() of the list head, i.e. a wild pointer into
struct rcar_thermal_common, which is dereferenced at
priv->chip->needs_suspend_resume and in the MMIO accesses that follow.
A malformed DT node with no MEM resource triggers this at every
suspend/resume cycle.

As suggested by Niklas Söderlund, fix this at the root instead of
tolerating an empty list in the PM callbacks: fail probe with -ENODEV
when no sensor was probed, since a successfully bound driver with zero
sensors is meaningless. The error path through rcar_thermal_remove()
already tolerates the empty list (it iterates with
rcar_thermal_for_each_priv()).

This issue was found by static analysis; we do not have R-Car hardware,
so this is compile-tested only.

Reported-by: Wang Haoran <haoranwangsec@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Li Ximo <lixicaicai@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Haoran <haoranwangsec@gmail.com>
---
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261026115018.3227372-1-lixicaicai@gmail.com
v2: completely rework the fix per Niklas Söderlund's review: fail probe
with -ENODEV when no sensors are probed instead of guarding
suspend/resume.

 drivers/thermal/renesas/rcar_thermal.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/renesas/rcar_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/renesas/rcar_thermal.c
index 9a9038671..6a1e977d8 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/renesas/rcar_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/renesas/rcar_thermal.c
@@ -514,6 +514,12 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			enr_bits |= 3 << (i * 8);
 	}
 
+	if (!i) {
+		dev_err(dev, "no thermal sensor probed\n");
+		ret = -ENODEV;
+		goto error_unregister;
+	}
+
 	if (common->base && enr_bits)
 		rcar_thermal_common_write(common, ENR, enr_bits);
 
-- 
2.30.2

                 reply	other threads:[~2026-11-03  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261103084604.700540-1-lixicaicai@gmail.com \
    --to=lixicaicai@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=haoranwangsec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®