mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] thermal/drivers/rcar_thermal: fail probe when no sensors are probed
@ 2026-11-03  8:46 Li Ximo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Li Ximo @ 2026-11-03  8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Niklas Söderlund, Rafael J . Wysocki, Daniel Lezcano
  Cc: Zhang Rui, Lukasz Luba, Geert Uytterhoeven, Magnus Damm,
	linux-renesas-soc, linux-pm, linux-kernel, Wang Haoran, Li Ximo

From: Wang Haoran <haoranwangsec@gmail.com>

rcar_thermal_probe() returns success even when zero sensors were probed
(the per-sensor loop simply falls through with i == 0), leaving
common->head empty. rcar_thermal_suspend()/rcar_thermal_resume() then
call list_first_entry(&common->head, ...) unconditionally, and
list_first_entry() on an empty list does not return NULL: it returns
container_of() of the list head, i.e. a wild pointer into
struct rcar_thermal_common, which is dereferenced at
priv->chip->needs_suspend_resume and in the MMIO accesses that follow.
A malformed DT node with no MEM resource triggers this at every
suspend/resume cycle.

As suggested by Niklas Söderlund, fix this at the root instead of
tolerating an empty list in the PM callbacks: fail probe with -ENODEV
when no sensor was probed, since a successfully bound driver with zero
sensors is meaningless. The error path through rcar_thermal_remove()
already tolerates the empty list (it iterates with
rcar_thermal_for_each_priv()).

This issue was found by static analysis; we do not have R-Car hardware,
so this is compile-tested only.

Reported-by: Wang Haoran <haoranwangsec@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Li Ximo <lixicaicai@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Haoran <haoranwangsec@gmail.com>
---
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261026115018.3227372-1-lixicaicai@gmail.com
v2: completely rework the fix per Niklas Söderlund's review: fail probe
with -ENODEV when no sensors are probed instead of guarding
suspend/resume.

 drivers/thermal/renesas/rcar_thermal.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/renesas/rcar_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/renesas/rcar_thermal.c
index 9a9038671..6a1e977d8 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/renesas/rcar_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/renesas/rcar_thermal.c
@@ -514,6 +514,12 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			enr_bits |= 3 << (i * 8);
 	}
 
+	if (!i) {
+		dev_err(dev, "no thermal sensor probed\n");
+		ret = -ENODEV;
+		goto error_unregister;
+	}
+
 	if (common->base && enr_bits)
 		rcar_thermal_common_write(common, ENR, enr_bits);
 
-- 
2.30.2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-11-03  8:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-03  8:46 [PATCH v2] thermal/drivers/rcar_thermal: fail probe when no sensors are probed Li Ximo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®