* [PATCH] blk-mq: take quiesce_lock when removing a queue from the tag set
@ 2026-11-03 19:04 Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 19:51 ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-04 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay @ 2026-11-03 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe
Cc: Mohamed Khalfella, Keith Busch, Ming Lei, Bart Van Assche,
Christoph Hellwig, Nilay Shroff, Josef Bacik, linux-block,
linux-kernel, tz2294, stable, Mani Tofigh
From: Mani Tofigh <mt4022@columbia.edu>
Unquiescing a tag set can run the hw queues of a queue whose hctxs were
already freed. blk_mq_unquiesce_tagset() walks the tag set's queues
under quiesce_lock and rcu_read_lock(). Commit 71ec3c7d6db8 ("blk-mq:
quiesce a queue that joins a quiesced tag set") added quiesce_lock to
the walks and to adding a queue, but blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set() still
removes a queue without it. The hctxs are then freed right away since
RCU only keeps the request_queue itself alive:
Task A (controller reset) Task B (namespace removal)
blk_mq_unquiesce_tagset()
/* finds q */
blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(q)
blk_mq_release(q)
/* frees the hctxs */
blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q)
/* reads freed hctxs */
The window is short. On PREEMPT_RT quiesce_lock is a sleeping lock and
the walk can be preempted inside it, which is how it's hit here:
[ 399.851277] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in blk_mq_run_hw_queues+0x4bd/0x550
[ 399.851328] Read of size 8 at addr ff11000003014148 by task kworker/u9:2/116
[ 399.851352] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 116 Comm: kworker/u9:2 Not tainted 7.3.0-16299-g81cb9aa43246 #1 PREEMPT_RT
[ 399.851425] Workqueue: nvme-reset-wq nvme_loop_reset_ctrl_work
[ 399.851441] Call Trace:
[ 399.851457] <TASK>
[ 399.851551] blk_mq_run_hw_queues+0x4bd/0x550
[ 399.851564] blk_mq_unquiesce_tagset+0x128/0x210
[ 399.851576] nvme_loop_reset_ctrl_work+0x78/0x4c0
[ 399.851600] process_one_work+0x92b/0x16d0
[ 399.851660] worker_thread+0x4e6/0xd60
[ 399.851707] kthread+0x300/0x3e0
[ 399.851727] ret_from_fork+0x4f0/0x6f0
[ 399.851776] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 399.851793] </TASK>
...
[ 399.851988] Freed by task 111:
[ 399.852040] kfree+0x1b3/0x4b0
[ 399.852050] blk_mq_release+0x400/0x550
[ 399.852060] blk_put_queue+0x94/0x120
[ 399.852068] disk_release+0x1bd/0x3f0
[ 399.852102] nvme_free_ns+0x39/0x270
[ 399.852113] nvme_remove_nsid_range+0x2d1/0x4a0
[ 399.852123] nvme_scan_ns_list+0x2cc/0x390
[ 399.852134] nvme_scan_work+0x421/0x9f0
...
With BLK_CGROUP the disk's root blkg holds the queue until a grace
period later, which hides this for NVMe namespaces. It's still open
without BLK_CGROUP, and from reading the code also for queues freed
without a disk (e.g., SCSI device queues on a UFS host).
Take quiesce_lock around the list_del_rcu() as well so that the walk
either finishes with a queue before it leaves the list or never sees
it. With the fix, KASAN doesn't report the use-after-free anymore.
This bug was identified and confirmed with the help of a deterministic
hypervisor currently under development. The C reproducer below however
hits it about once every 20 minutes on a PREEMPT_RT kernel.
Fixes: 59e25ef2b413 ("block: Use RCU in blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() instead of set->tag_list_lock")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mani Tofigh <mt4022@columbia.edu>
---
Stable trees need 71ec3c7d6db8 first since it adds quiesce_lock.
Reproducer: https://github.com/manitofigh/files/blob/main/linux-repros/blkquiesce.c
---
block/blk-mq.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 5ae22d556540..54ccfc43c27c 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -4354,7 +4354,10 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q)
lockdep_assert_held(&set->tag_list_lock);
+ /* blk_mq_unquiesce_tagset() runs the hctxs, which are not RCU freed */
+ spin_lock(&set->quiesce_lock);
list_del_rcu(&q->tag_set_list);
+ spin_unlock(&set->quiesce_lock);
if (list_is_singular(&set->tag_list)) {
/* just transitioned to unshared */
set->flags &= ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED;
---
base-commit: 801bddbf1e4147a69b811c548c35a06a157941b4
change-id: 20261103-blk-mq-del-quiesce-lock-b9e0f81947b8
Best regards,
--
Mani Tofigh <mt4022@columbia.edu>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: take quiesce_lock when removing a queue from the tag set
2026-11-03 19:04 [PATCH] blk-mq: take quiesce_lock when removing a queue from the tag set Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
@ 2026-11-03 19:51 ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-04 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mohamed Khalfella @ 2026-11-03 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mt4022
Cc: Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Ming Lei, Bart Van Assche,
Christoph Hellwig, Nilay Shroff, Josef Bacik, linux-block,
linux-kernel, tz2294, stable
On Tue 2026-11-03 14:04:10 -0500, Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Mani Tofigh <mt4022@columbia.edu>
>
> Unquiescing a tag set can run the hw queues of a queue whose hctxs were
> already freed. blk_mq_unquiesce_tagset() walks the tag set's queues
> under quiesce_lock and rcu_read_lock(). Commit 71ec3c7d6db8 ("blk-mq:
> quiesce a queue that joins a quiesced tag set") added quiesce_lock to
> the walks and to adding a queue, but blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set() still
> removes a queue without it. The hctxs are then freed right away since
> RCU only keeps the request_queue itself alive:
>
> Task A (controller reset) Task B (namespace removal)
> blk_mq_unquiesce_tagset()
> /* finds q */
> blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(q)
> blk_mq_release(q)
> /* frees the hctxs */
> blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q)
> /* reads freed hctxs */
>
> The window is short. On PREEMPT_RT quiesce_lock is a sleeping lock and
> the walk can be preempted inside it, which is how it's hit here:
>
> [ 399.851277] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in blk_mq_run_hw_queues+0x4bd/0x550
> [ 399.851328] Read of size 8 at addr ff11000003014148 by task kworker/u9:2/116
> [ 399.851352] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 116 Comm: kworker/u9:2 Not tainted 7.3.0-16299-g81cb9aa43246 #1 PREEMPT_RT
> [ 399.851425] Workqueue: nvme-reset-wq nvme_loop_reset_ctrl_work
> [ 399.851441] Call Trace:
> [ 399.851457] <TASK>
> [ 399.851551] blk_mq_run_hw_queues+0x4bd/0x550
> [ 399.851564] blk_mq_unquiesce_tagset+0x128/0x210
> [ 399.851576] nvme_loop_reset_ctrl_work+0x78/0x4c0
> [ 399.851600] process_one_work+0x92b/0x16d0
> [ 399.851660] worker_thread+0x4e6/0xd60
> [ 399.851707] kthread+0x300/0x3e0
> [ 399.851727] ret_from_fork+0x4f0/0x6f0
> [ 399.851776] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> [ 399.851793] </TASK>
> ...
> [ 399.851988] Freed by task 111:
> [ 399.852040] kfree+0x1b3/0x4b0
> [ 399.852050] blk_mq_release+0x400/0x550
> [ 399.852060] blk_put_queue+0x94/0x120
> [ 399.852068] disk_release+0x1bd/0x3f0
> [ 399.852102] nvme_free_ns+0x39/0x270
> [ 399.852113] nvme_remove_nsid_range+0x2d1/0x4a0
> [ 399.852123] nvme_scan_ns_list+0x2cc/0x390
> [ 399.852134] nvme_scan_work+0x421/0x9f0
> ...
>
> With BLK_CGROUP the disk's root blkg holds the queue until a grace
> period later, which hides this for NVMe namespaces. It's still open
> without BLK_CGROUP, and from reading the code also for queues freed
> without a disk (e.g., SCSI device queues on a UFS host).
>
> Take quiesce_lock around the list_del_rcu() as well so that the walk
> either finishes with a queue before it leaves the list or never sees
> it. With the fix, KASAN doesn't report the use-after-free anymore.
Do we need to update the documentation of @quiesce_lock to mention that
it is now taken when a queue is deleted also?
>
> This bug was identified and confirmed with the help of a deterministic
> hypervisor currently under development. The C reproducer below however
> hits it about once every 20 minutes on a PREEMPT_RT kernel.
>
> Fixes: 59e25ef2b413 ("block: Use RCU in blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() instead of set->tag_list_lock")
Yep, my commit introduced the race by not taking set->tag_list_lock
which provided the needed serialization previously. Thank you for fixing
it.
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Mani Tofigh <mt4022@columbia.edu>
Reviewed-by: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: take quiesce_lock when removing a queue from the tag set
2026-11-03 19:04 [PATCH] blk-mq: take quiesce_lock when removing a queue from the tag set Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 19:51 ` Mohamed Khalfella
@ 2026-11-04 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-11-04 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mt4022
Cc: Jens Axboe, Mohamed Khalfella, Keith Busch, Ming Lei,
Bart Van Assche, Christoph Hellwig, Nilay Shroff, Josef Bacik,
linux-block, linux-kernel, tz2294, stable
Looks good, but the note from Mohamed should be taken into account.
Or even better add a guarded_by so that clang catches this (requires
actualy compile testing with clang, though).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-04 7:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-03 19:04 [PATCH] blk-mq: take quiesce_lock when removing a queue from the tag set Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 19:51 ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-11-04 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®