Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Fixes for arm64 KVM support

[Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>]

On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 06:31:31PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2026 16:37:01 +0000,
> Andreas Grapentin <gra@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Some fixups for the previous series that introduced arm64 KVM support on
> > s390. Forward-declare enum vcpu_sysreg because we are definitely going
> > to need that, then make the module naming consistent and iron out an
> > inconsistency in the definition of vcpu->arch.pause between s390 and
> > native arm64 KVM.
> 
> It's an interesting one. Obviously, this wasn't caught by building the
> upstream code. I guess this triggered with the rest of the patches?

Yes, this was triggered by the rest of the patches. The field somehow
got in the first batch although it is not needed. We'll need it later
anyways so I did not delete it for this fixup.

> 
> > 
> > No functional changes intended on either arm64 or s390.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <gra@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > Andreas Grapentin (2):
> >       KVM: s390: arm64: Declare enum vcpu_sysreg
> >       KVM: s390: arm64: Fix kvm_arm64 module naming consistency
> > 
> > Steffen Eiden (1):
> >       KVM: s390: arm64: Turn vcpu->arch.pause into a counter
> > 
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host_arm64.h |  8 ++++----
> >  arch/s390/kvm/arm64/Makefile           | 12 ++++++------
> >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> Looks all reasonable to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

Thanks.

	Steffen