mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/31] ocfs2: abstract the dinode suballoc slot checks
Date: Fri,  6 Nov 2026 19:14:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261106111458.1467464-7-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106111458.1467464-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>

The suballoc slot validation is a nested if/else-if whose two arms carry
different error messages.  Split it into two predicates so each message
stays at its own call site without having to re-test the slot value to
work out which arm fired.

The arms were already mutually exclusive, so two sequential tests are
equivalent to the if/else-if.

Keep the OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT exclusion in the range predicate.
OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT is 65535, which is greater than max_slots - 1, so
without it every system inode mkfs.ocfs2 creates from the global
allocator would be rejected.

ocfs2_get_suballoc_slot_bit() in suballoc.c open-codes an identical range
test, and is deliberately not converted.  The dinode validator pairs the
range predicate with ocfs2_dinode_has_invalid_suballoc_slot(), which also
rejects OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT on a non-system inode, so that pair is stricter
than what ocfs2_get_suballoc_slot_bit() accepts.  The range predicate on
its own is not stricter, it is the same test.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
index 6b78b3f3c5fa..0929deb3e4b4 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
@@ -98,6 +98,19 @@ static bool ocfs2_dinode_has_wrong_fs_generation(struct super_block *sb,
 	return le32_to_cpu(di->i_fs_generation) != OCFS2_SB(sb)->fs_generation;
 }
 
+static bool ocfs2_dinode_has_invalid_suballoc_slot(struct ocfs2_dinode *di)
+{
+	return le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot) == (u16)OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT &&
+		!(le32_to_cpu(di->i_flags) & OCFS2_SYSTEM_FL);
+}
+
+static bool ocfs2_dinode_has_out_of_range_suballoc_slot(struct super_block *sb,
+							struct ocfs2_dinode *di)
+{
+	return le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot) != (u16)OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT &&
+		(u32)le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot) > OCFS2_SB(sb)->max_slots - 1;
+}
+
 static bool ocfs2_valid_inode_mode(umode_t mode)
 {
 	return fs_umode_to_ftype(mode) != FT_UNKNOWN;
@@ -1564,15 +1577,15 @@ int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
 	 * deleting it would pass the slot to get_local_system_inode() via
 	 * ocfs2_remove_inode() and trigger BUG_ON(slot == OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT).
 	 */
-	if (le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot) == (u16)OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT) {
-		if (!(le32_to_cpu(di->i_flags) & OCFS2_SYSTEM_FL)) {
-			rc = ocfs2_error(sb,
-					 "Invalid dinode %llu: suballoc slot %u for non-system inode\n",
-					 (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
-					 le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot));
-			goto bail;
-		}
-	} else if ((u32)le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot) > OCFS2_SB(sb)->max_slots - 1) {
+	if (ocfs2_dinode_has_invalid_suballoc_slot(di)) {
+		rc = ocfs2_error(sb,
+				 "Invalid dinode %llu: suballoc slot %u for non-system inode\n",
+				 (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
+				 le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot));
+		goto bail;
+	}
+
+	if (ocfs2_dinode_has_out_of_range_suballoc_slot(sb, di)) {
 		rc = ocfs2_error(sb, "Invalid dinode %llu: suballoc slot %u\n",
 				 (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
 				 le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_slot));
-- 
2.39.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-06 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-06 11:14 [PATCH v2 00/31] ocfs2: split dinode validation into shared predicates Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/31] ocfs2: exempt orphaned dinodes from the zero nlink check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/31] ocfs2: abstract the zero nlink or mode dinode check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 03/31] ocfs2: abstract the dinode i_blkno mismatch check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 04/31] ocfs2: abstract the dinode OCFS2_VALID_FL check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 05/31] ocfs2: abstract the dinode fs_generation mismatch check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` Joseph Qi [this message]
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 07/31] ocfs2: abstract the dinode suballoc bit check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 08/31] ocfs2: abstract the dinode orphaned slot check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 09/31] ocfs2: abstract the dinode DIO " Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 10/31] ocfs2: abstract the inline data dinode guard and cluster check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 11/31] ocfs2: abstract the inline data id_count bound check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 12/31] ocfs2: abstract the inline data i_size " Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 13/31] ocfs2: abstract the fast symlink dinode guard and size check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 14/31] ocfs2: abstract the fast symlink NUL-termination check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 15/31] ocfs2: abstract the chain list dinode guard and count check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 16/31] ocfs2: abstract the chain list next free record check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 17/31] ocfs2: abstract the chain list bits per cluster check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 18/31] ocfs2: abstract the dinode refcount location check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 19/31] ocfs2: abstract the zero extent list count check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 20/31] ocfs2: abstract the oversized " Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 21/31] ocfs2: abstract the extent list next free record check Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 22/31] ocfs2: report unrepairable corruption from online filecheck fix Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 23/31] ocfs2: check dinode nlink and mode in online filecheck Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 24/31] ocfs2: check dinode suballoc slot " Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 25/31] ocfs2: check dinode suballoc bit " Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 26/31] ocfs2: check dinode orphaned slots " Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 27/31] ocfs2: check inline data dinodes " Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 28/31] ocfs2: check fast symlink " Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 29/31] ocfs2: check chain list " Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 30/31] ocfs2: check dinode refcount location " Joseph Qi
2026-11-06 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 31/31] ocfs2: check extent list dinodes " Joseph Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261106111458.1467464-7-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®