mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net v3 0/2] net: psp: preserve SKB_EXT_PSP across packet scrubbing
@ 2026-11-06 18:20 Wei Wang
  2026-11-06 18:20 ` [PATCH net v3 1/2] net: Make PSP skb extension survive " Wei Wang
  2026-11-06 18:20 ` [PATCH net v3 2/2] selftests/net: psp: test bidirectional data transfer Wei Wang
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wei Wang @ 2026-11-06 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Andrew Lunn, Shuah Khan
  Cc: Simon Horman, Jakub Sitnicki, Daniel Zahka, Willem de Bruijn,
	netdev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, bpf, Wei Wang

When a virtual interface such as netkit is associated with a PSP device
in another network namespace via PSP_CMD_DEV_ASSOC, incoming PSP packets
decapsulated on the physical device lose their SKB_EXT_PSP extension
when scrubbed during redirection (e.g. skb_do_redirect() or
netkit_xmit() calling skb_scrub_packet()). As a result,
__psp_sk_rx_policy_check() rejects incoming PSP-encrypted TCP data
segments at the socket layer.

This gap slipped through the existing psp.py selftests because both
_data_basic_send() and _data_basic_send_netkit_psp_assoc() only sent a
unidirectional data stream from the test socket to psp_responder; the
returning pure TCP ACKs had SKB_EXT_PSP stripped by skb_scrub_packet(),
but were still accepted by __psp_sk_rx_policy_check() while peer_tx was
unset.

Patch 1 (originally from Jakub Sitnicki's BPF skb extension series [1])
introduces skb_ext_scrub() to selectively preserve SKB_EXT_PSP during
skb_scrub_packet().

Patch 2 updates the psp.py selftests to exercise bidirectional PSP data
transfer using psp_responder's "data echo" command in both direct and
netkit dev-assoc test cases.

Changes in v3:
- Patch 1: Move tmp = *pse; after the fast-path early return, just
  before skb_ext_reset(skb).
- Patch 1: Do not clear skb->decrypted if skb_ext_add() fails so
  sk_validate_xmit_skb() still drops socketless decrypted packets on
  egress.
- Patch 2: Replace s.settimeout() in _check_data_echo() with
  non-blocking _recv_careful() and _req_echo() helpers.

Changes in v2:
- Patch 1: Replace the skb_ext_del() loop in skb_ext_scrub() with
  skb_ext_reset() + skb_ext_add() (and a fast path when SKB_EXT_PSP is
  the only extension in the skb_ext buffer) so shared skb_ext buffers
  with refcounted extensions (SKB_EXT_SEC_PATH / SKB_EXT_MCTP) are not
  left half-deleted.
- Patch 1: Make skb_ext_scrub() static in net/core/skbuff.c and drop
  EXPORT_SYMBOL() / public header prototype.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260910-bpf-meta-inside-skb-ext-v2-3-0b21e42180b0@cloudflare.com/ [1]

Wei Wang (2):
  net: Make PSP skb extension survive packet scrubbing
  selftests/net: psp: test bidirectional data transfer

 net/core/skbuff.c                          | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py | 22 ++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.56.0.455.g6c5a503b38-goog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net v3 1/2] net: Make PSP skb extension survive packet scrubbing
  2026-11-06 18:20 [PATCH net v3 0/2] net: psp: preserve SKB_EXT_PSP across packet scrubbing Wei Wang
@ 2026-11-06 18:20 ` Wei Wang
  2026-11-06 18:20 ` [PATCH net v3 2/2] selftests/net: psp: test bidirectional data transfer Wei Wang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wei Wang @ 2026-11-06 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Andrew Lunn, Shuah Khan
  Cc: Simon Horman, Jakub Sitnicki, Daniel Zahka, Willem de Bruijn,
	netdev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, bpf, Wei Wang

skb_scrub_packet() drops all skb extensions unconditionally via
skb_ext_reset(). It runs on tunnel encap/decap (ip_tunnel_rcv, vxlan_rcv,
etc.) and virtual device forwarding/redirection (dev_forward_skb,
netkit_xmit, skb_do_redirect).

When a virtual device such as netkit is associated with a PSP device in
another network namespace via PSP_CMD_DEV_ASSOC, incoming PSP packets
decapsulated by psp_dev_rcv() lose their SKB_EXT_PSP extension when
scrubbed during redirection into the peer netns. Without SKB_EXT_PSP,
__psp_sk_rx_policy_check() rejects incoming TCP data segments at the
socket layer with SKB_DROP_REASON_PSP_INPUT.

Introduce a static skb_ext_scrub() helper in net/core/skbuff.c to
preserve SKB_EXT_PSP across skb_scrub_packet() while dropping all other
extensions. If SKB_EXT_PSP is not active, skb_ext_scrub() simply calls
skb_ext_reset(). If SKB_EXT_PSP is the only extension in the skb_ext
buffer, nothing needs to be scrubbed. Otherwise, save the PSP metadata,
reset the extension block, and re-add a fresh SKB_EXT_PSP extension.

Fixes: 06c2dce2d0f6 ("psp: add new netlink cmd for dev-assoc and dev-disassoc")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260910-bpf-meta-inside-skb-ext-v2-3-0b21e42180b0@cloudflare.com
Reported-by: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/DLODSKPY6ON6.1G6SP3CFFLCPJ@gmail.com/
Co-developed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 93c2f440b9ec..ddbf0f3342ca 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -6369,6 +6369,31 @@ bool skb_try_coalesce(struct sk_buff *to, struct sk_buff *from,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_try_coalesce);
 
+static void skb_ext_scrub(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET_PSP)
+	struct psp_skb_ext *pse = skb_ext_find(skb, SKB_EXT_PSP);
+
+	if (pse) {
+		struct skb_ext *ext = skb->extensions;
+		struct psp_skb_ext tmp;
+
+		/* Nothing else to scrub if PSP is the only extension in ext. */
+		if (ext->chunks == SKB_EXT_CHUNKSIZEOF(*ext) +
+				   skb_ext_type_len[SKB_EXT_PSP])
+			return;
+
+		tmp = *pse;
+		skb_ext_reset(skb);
+		pse = skb_ext_add(skb, SKB_EXT_PSP);
+		if (pse)
+			memcpy(pse, &tmp, sizeof(*pse));
+		return;
+	}
+#endif
+	skb_ext_reset(skb);
+}
+
 /**
  * skb_scrub_packet - scrub an skb
  *
@@ -6380,7 +6405,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_try_coalesce);
  * operations.
  * skb_scrub_packet can also be used to clean a skb before injecting it in
  * another namespace (@xnet == true). We have to clear all information in the
- * skb that could impact namespace isolation.
+ * skb that could impact namespace isolation. Note that PSP skb extension is
+ * preserved across packet scrubbing by design.
  */
 void skb_scrub_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, bool xnet)
 {
@@ -6388,7 +6414,7 @@ void skb_scrub_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, bool xnet)
 	skb->skb_iif = 0;
 	skb->ignore_df = 0;
 	skb_dst_drop(skb);
-	skb_ext_reset(skb);
+	skb_ext_scrub(skb);
 	nf_reset_ct(skb);
 	nf_reset_trace(skb);
 
-- 
2.56.0.455.g6c5a503b38-goog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net v3 2/2] selftests/net: psp: test bidirectional data transfer
  2026-11-06 18:20 [PATCH net v3 0/2] net: psp: preserve SKB_EXT_PSP across packet scrubbing Wei Wang
  2026-11-06 18:20 ` [PATCH net v3 1/2] net: Make PSP skb extension survive " Wei Wang
@ 2026-11-06 18:20 ` Wei Wang
  2026-11-06 18:34   ` Daniel Zahka
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wei Wang @ 2026-11-06 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Andrew Lunn, Shuah Khan
  Cc: Simon Horman, Jakub Sitnicki, Daniel Zahka, Willem de Bruijn,
	netdev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, bpf, Wei Wang

_data_basic_send() and _data_basic_send_netkit_psp_assoc() currently
only verify unidirectional data transmission from the test socket to
psp_responder. As a result, they do not exercise the receive path for
PSP-encrypted TCP data segments arriving at the test socket (such as
packets redirected across a netkit interface associated via dev-assoc,
which relies on SKB_EXT_PSP surviving packet scrubbing).

Use the existing "data echo" command in psp_responder to verify that the
test socket can also receive PSP-encrypted data from the peer in both
_data_basic_send() and _data_basic_send_netkit_psp_assoc().

Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
index 473500901879..c114d2245135 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
@@ -120,6 +120,26 @@ def _check_data_rx(cfg, exp_len):
     ksft_eq(read_len, exp_len)
 
 
+def _recv_careful(s, target, timeout=2):
+    """Read exactly target bytes, tolerating short reads"""
+    data = b''
+    end = time.monotonic() + timeout
+    while time.monotonic() < end:
+        try:
+            data += s.recv(target - len(data), socket.MSG_DONTWAIT)
+            if len(data) == target:
+                return data
+        except BlockingIOError:
+            time.sleep(0.001)
+    raise KsftFailEx(f"short read, got {len(data)} of {target} bytes")
+
+
+def _req_echo(cfg, s):
+    """Ask the peer to echo, and check the reply arrives intact"""
+    _send_with_ack(cfg, b'data echo\0')
+    ksft_eq(_recv_careful(s, 5), b'echo\0')
+
+
 def _check_data_outq(s, exp_len, force_wait=False):
     outq = 0
     for _ in range(10):
@@ -478,6 +498,7 @@ def _data_basic_send(cfg, version, ipver):
 
     data_len = _send_careful(cfg, s, 100)
     _check_data_rx(cfg, data_len)
+    _req_echo(cfg, s)
     _close_psp_conn(cfg, s)
 
 
@@ -726,6 +747,7 @@ def _data_basic_send_netkit_psp_assoc(cfg, version, ipver):
 
         data_len = _send_careful(cfg, sock, 100)
         _check_data_rx(cfg, data_len)
+        _req_echo(cfg, sock)
         _close_psp_conn(cfg, sock)
 
 
-- 
2.56.0.455.g6c5a503b38-goog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net v3 2/2] selftests/net: psp: test bidirectional data transfer
  2026-11-06 18:20 ` [PATCH net v3 2/2] selftests/net: psp: test bidirectional data transfer Wei Wang
@ 2026-11-06 18:34   ` Daniel Zahka
  2026-11-06 18:57     ` Daniel Zahka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Zahka @ 2026-11-06 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wei Wang, David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
	Andrew Lunn, Shuah Khan
  Cc: Simon Horman, Jakub Sitnicki, Daniel Zahka, Willem de Bruijn,
	netdev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, bpf

On Fri Nov 6, 2026 at 1:20 PM EST, Wei Wang wrote:
> _data_basic_send() and _data_basic_send_netkit_psp_assoc() currently
> only verify unidirectional data transmission from the test socket to
> psp_responder. As a result, they do not exercise the receive path for
> PSP-encrypted TCP data segments arriving at the test socket (such as
> packets redirected across a netkit interface associated via dev-assoc,
> which relies on SKB_EXT_PSP surviving packet scrubbing).
>
> Use the existing "data echo" command in psp_responder to verify that the
> test socket can also receive PSP-encrypted data from the peer in both
> _data_basic_send() and _data_basic_send_netkit_psp_assoc().
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>

> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
> index 473500901879..c114d2245135 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
> @@ -120,6 +120,26 @@ def _check_data_rx(cfg, exp_len):
>      ksft_eq(read_len, exp_len)
>  
>  
> +def _recv_careful(s, target, timeout=2):
> +    """Read exactly target bytes, tolerating short reads"""
> +    data = b''
> +    end = time.monotonic() + timeout
> +    while time.monotonic() < end:
> +        try:
> +            data += s.recv(target - len(data), socket.MSG_DONTWAIT)
> +            if len(data) == target:
> +                return data
> +        except BlockingIOError:
> +            time.sleep(0.001)
> +    raise KsftFailEx(f"short read, got {len(data)} of {target} bytes")
> +
> +
> +def _req_echo(cfg, s):
> +    """Ask the peer to echo, and check the reply arrives intact"""
> +    _send_with_ack(cfg, b'data echo\0')
> +    ksft_eq(_recv_careful(s, 5), b'echo\0')
> +
> +
>  def _check_data_outq(s, exp_len, force_wait=False):
>      outq = 0
>      for _ in range(10):
> @@ -478,6 +498,7 @@ def _data_basic_send(cfg, version, ipver):
>  
>      data_len = _send_careful(cfg, s, 100)
>      _check_data_rx(cfg, data_len)
> +    _req_echo(cfg, s)
>      _close_psp_conn(cfg, s)
>  
>  
> @@ -726,6 +747,7 @@ def _data_basic_send_netkit_psp_assoc(cfg, version, ipver):
>  
>          data_len = _send_careful(cfg, sock, 100)
>          _check_data_rx(cfg, data_len)
> +        _req_echo(cfg, sock)
>          _close_psp_conn(cfg, sock)
>  
>  


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net v3 2/2] selftests/net: psp: test bidirectional data transfer
  2026-11-06 18:34   ` Daniel Zahka
@ 2026-11-06 18:57     ` Daniel Zahka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Zahka @ 2026-11-06 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Zahka, Wei Wang, David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski,
	Paolo Abeni, Andrew Lunn, Shuah Khan
  Cc: Simon Horman, Jakub Sitnicki, Willem de Bruijn, netdev,
	linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, bpf

On Fri Nov 6, 2026 at 1:34 PM EST, Daniel Zahka wrote:
> On Fri Nov 6, 2026 at 1:20 PM EST, Wei Wang wrote:
>> _data_basic_send() and _data_basic_send_netkit_psp_assoc() currently
>> only verify unidirectional data transmission from the test socket to
>> psp_responder. As a result, they do not exercise the receive path for
>> PSP-encrypted TCP data segments arriving at the test socket (such as
>> packets redirected across a netkit interface associated via dev-assoc,
>> which relies on SKB_EXT_PSP surviving packet scrubbing).
>>
>> Use the existing "data echo" command in psp_responder to verify that the
>> test socket can also receive PSP-encrypted data from the peer in both
>> _data_basic_send() and _data_basic_send_netkit_psp_assoc().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>
>
>> ---
>>  tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
>> index 473500901879..c114d2245135 100755
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/psp.py
>> @@ -120,6 +120,26 @@ def _check_data_rx(cfg, exp_len):
>>      ksft_eq(read_len, exp_len)
>>  
>>  
>> +def _recv_careful(s, target, timeout=2):
>> +    """Read exactly target bytes, tolerating short reads"""
>> +    data = b''
>> +    end = time.monotonic() + timeout
>> +    while time.monotonic() < end:
>> +        try:
>> +            data += s.recv(target - len(data), socket.MSG_DONTWAIT)
>> +            if len(data) == target:
>> +                return data
>> +        except BlockingIOError:
>> +            time.sleep(0.001)
>> +    raise KsftFailEx(f"short read, got {len(data)} of {target} bytes")
>> +
>> +
>> +def _req_echo(cfg, s):
>> +    """Ask the peer to echo, and check the reply arrives intact"""
>> +    _send_with_ack(cfg, b'data echo\0')
>> +    ksft_eq(_recv_careful(s, 5), b'echo\0')
>> +
>> +
>>  def _check_data_outq(s, exp_len, force_wait=False):
>>      outq = 0
>>      for _ in range(10):
>> @@ -478,6 +498,7 @@ def _data_basic_send(cfg, version, ipver):
>>  
>>      data_len = _send_careful(cfg, s, 100)
>>      _check_data_rx(cfg, data_len)
>> +    _req_echo(cfg, s)
>>      _close_psp_conn(cfg, s)
>>  
>>  
>> @@ -726,6 +747,7 @@ def _data_basic_send_netkit_psp_assoc(cfg, version, ipver):
>>  
>>          data_len = _send_careful(cfg, sock, 100)
>>          _check_data_rx(cfg, data_len)
>> +        _req_echo(cfg, sock)
>>          _close_psp_conn(cfg, sock)
>>  
>>  

It occurs to me now that we could have just changed the key exchange
protocol used here to have a psp encrypted "start of psp" message that
each side sends and blocks waiting to receive like psp.rst suggests. Not
worth respinning, but maybe a future cleanup worth doing.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-06 18:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-06 18:20 [PATCH net v3 0/2] net: psp: preserve SKB_EXT_PSP across packet scrubbing Wei Wang
2026-11-06 18:20 ` [PATCH net v3 1/2] net: Make PSP skb extension survive " Wei Wang
2026-11-06 18:20 ` [PATCH net v3 2/2] selftests/net: psp: test bidirectional data transfer Wei Wang
2026-11-06 18:34   ` Daniel Zahka
2026-11-06 18:57     ` Daniel Zahka

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®