From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>,
Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: guard memory provider RX queue open and close on unregister
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2026 05:58:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261108055809.2122934-4-almasrymina@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261108055809.2122934-1-almasrymina@google.com>
When a memory provider RX queue is leased to a virtual netdev,
netif_mp_open_rxq() and netif_mp_close_rxq() redirect through
rxq->lease and lock the physical backing netdev directly rather than via
netdev_get_by_index_lock(). This raises two issues during netdev
unregistration:
1. In __netif_mp_open_rxq(), the physical backing netdev may already be
in NETREG_UNREGISTERING (after dev_shutdown() and
dev_memory_provider_uninstall() have run on it, before cascaded
unregistration of the virtual leasee tears down the lease). Reject
opening an RX queue if dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED.
2. In __netif_mp_close_rxq(), when the physical backing netdev
unregisters before the virtual leasee, dev_memory_provider_uninstall()
on the physical netdev does not uninstall the virtual queues, so
phys_rxq->mp_params remains populated until the virtual leasee's
netif_rxq_cleanup_unlease() or socket teardown runs. At that point
the physical netdev has already gone through dev_shutdown() and must
not call netdev_rx_queue_reconfig(). When dev->reg_state >
NETREG_REGISTERED, clear rxq->mp_params and return 0.
Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
---
net/core/netdev_rx_queue.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/netdev_rx_queue.c b/net/core/netdev_rx_queue.c
index a7261fedd5e76..85ae5abf16b8e 100644
--- a/net/core/netdev_rx_queue.c
+++ b/net/core/netdev_rx_queue.c
@@ -193,6 +193,14 @@ static int __netif_mp_open_rxq(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int rxq_idx,
struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq;
int ret;
+ /* A leased physical dev is locked via rxq->lease rather than
+ * netdev_get_by_index_lock(), so check reg_state under its lock.
+ */
+ if (dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device is being unregistered");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
if (!qops)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -284,12 +292,13 @@ static int __netif_mp_close_rxq(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int rxq_idx,
rxq = __netif_get_rx_queue(dev, rxq_idx);
- /* Callers holding a netdev ref may get here after we already
- * went thru shutdown via dev_memory_provider_uninstall().
+ /* Callers holding a netdev ref or tearing down a queue lease may get
+ * here after dev already went through shutdown.
*/
- if (dev->reg_state > NETREG_REGISTERED &&
- !rxq->mp_params.mp_ops)
+ if (dev->reg_state > NETREG_REGISTERED) {
+ memset(&rxq->mp_params, 0, sizeof(rxq->mp_params));
return 0;
+ }
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rxq->mp_params.mp_ops != old_p->mp_ops ||
rxq->mp_params.mp_priv != old_p->mp_priv))
--
2.56.0.455.g6c5a503b38-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-08 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-08 5:58 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] net: devmem: support leased RX and TX queues on netdev unregister Mina Almasry
2026-11-08 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] net: devmem: pass net_device pointer to net_devmem_lock_dev() Mina Almasry
2026-11-08 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] net: devmem: rename binding dev and vdev to map_dev and bind_dev Mina Almasry
2026-11-08 5:58 ` Mina Almasry [this message]
2026-11-08 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] net: devmem: always populate bind_dev and detach both devices on unregister Mina Almasry
2026-11-08 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: devmem: resolve physical map_dev for leased RX bindings Mina Almasry
2026-11-08 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] selftests: net: add leased devmem RX and TX netdev unregister tests Mina Almasry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261108055809.2122934-4-almasrymina@google.com \
--to=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®