From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>,
Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: devmem: resolve physical map_dev for leased RX bindings
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2026 05:58:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261108055809.2122934-6-almasrymina@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261108055809.2122934-1-almasrymina@google.com>
Previously, netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit() passed netdev as both map_dev and
bind_dev to net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(), so leased RX bindings stored the
virtual netdev in binding->map_dev without tracking the physical backing
netdev at all. Unregistering the physical backing netdev while a leased
RX binding was active failed to detach and unmap the dmabuf.
Return the physical backing net_device from netdev_nl_get_dma_dev() when
the RX queue is leased from another netdev, lock map_dev around
net_devmem_bind_dmabuf() when map_dev != netdev (matching
netdev_nl_bind_tx_doit()), and assert in net_devmem_bind_dmabuf() that
both bind_dev and map_dev are locked.
Because a leased map_dev is reached via rxq->lease->dev and locked with
raw netdev_lock(map_dev) rather than netdev_get_by_index_lock(), it may
already have entered NETREG_UNREGISTERING and completed
net_devmem_dev_unregister(map_dev) before cascaded unregistration of
bind_dev tears down the lease. Reject binding in
net_devmem_bind_dmabuf() if map_dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED.
Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
---
net/core/devmem.c | 12 ++++++++++++
net/core/netdev-genl.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/devmem.c b/net/core/devmem.c
index bb785a871d1c4..2dac581a57e13 100644
--- a/net/core/devmem.c
+++ b/net/core/devmem.c
@@ -321,6 +321,18 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *map_dev,
size_t i;
long err;
+ netdev_assert_locked(bind_dev);
+ netdev_assert_locked(map_dev);
+
+ /* When map_dev != bind_dev, map_dev is locked via the queue lease
+ * rather than netdev_get_by_index_lock(), so it may already be
+ * unregistering before cascaded bind_dev unregistration runs.
+ */
+ if (map_dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device is being unregistered");
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+ }
+
if (!dma_dev) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device doesn't support DMA");
return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
index 9e56c26fc65f9..442362f23fe88 100644
--- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
+++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
@@ -1005,12 +1005,15 @@ static int netdev_nl_read_rxq_bitmap(struct genl_info *info,
static struct device *
netdev_nl_get_dma_dev(struct net_device *netdev, unsigned long *rxq_bitmap,
+ struct net_device **map_dev,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct device *dma_dev = NULL;
u32 rxq_idx, prev_rxq_idx;
+ *map_dev = netdev;
for_each_set_bit(rxq_idx, rxq_bitmap, netdev->real_num_rx_queues) {
+ struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq;
struct device *rxq_dma_dev;
rxq_dma_dev = netdev_queue_get_dma_dev(netdev, rxq_idx,
@@ -1023,6 +1026,11 @@ netdev_nl_get_dma_dev(struct net_device *netdev, unsigned long *rxq_bitmap,
dma_dev = rxq_dma_dev;
prev_rxq_idx = rxq_idx;
+ if (netif_rxq_is_leased(netdev, rxq_idx) &&
+ netif_is_queue_leasee(netdev)) {
+ rxq = __netif_get_rx_queue(netdev, rxq_idx);
+ *map_dev = rxq->lease->dev;
+ }
}
return dma_dev;
@@ -1032,9 +1040,9 @@ int netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
{
struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding;
unsigned int niov_shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
+ struct net_device *netdev, *map_dev;
u32 ifindex, dmabuf_fd, rxq_idx;
struct netdev_nl_sock *priv;
- struct net_device *netdev;
unsigned long *rxq_bitmap;
struct device *dma_dev;
struct sk_buff *rsp;
@@ -1104,16 +1112,21 @@ int netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
if (err)
goto err_rxq_bitmap;
- dma_dev = netdev_nl_get_dma_dev(netdev, rxq_bitmap, info->extack);
+ dma_dev = netdev_nl_get_dma_dev(netdev, rxq_bitmap, &map_dev,
+ info->extack);
if (IS_ERR(dma_dev)) {
err = PTR_ERR(dma_dev);
goto err_rxq_bitmap;
}
- binding = net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(netdev, netdev, dma_dev,
+ if (map_dev != netdev)
+ netdev_lock(map_dev);
+ binding = net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(map_dev, netdev, dma_dev,
DMA_FROM_DEVICE, dmabuf_fd,
niov_shift, priv, NETLINK_CB(skb).sk,
info->extack);
+ if (map_dev != netdev)
+ netdev_unlock(map_dev);
if (IS_ERR(binding)) {
err = PTR_ERR(binding);
goto err_rxq_bitmap;
--
2.56.0.455.g6c5a503b38-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-08 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-08 5:58 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] net: devmem: support leased RX and TX queues on netdev unregister Mina Almasry
2026-11-08 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] net: devmem: pass net_device pointer to net_devmem_lock_dev() Mina Almasry
2026-11-08 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] net: devmem: rename binding dev and vdev to map_dev and bind_dev Mina Almasry
2026-11-08 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: guard memory provider RX queue open and close on unregister Mina Almasry
2026-11-08 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] net: devmem: always populate bind_dev and detach both devices " Mina Almasry
2026-11-08 5:58 ` Mina Almasry [this message]
2026-11-08 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] selftests: net: add leased devmem RX and TX netdev unregister tests Mina Almasry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261108055809.2122934-6-almasrymina@google.com \
--to=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®