From: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
To: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Cc: "Raul E Rangel" <rrangel@chromium.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Heikki Krogerus" <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Richard Genoud" <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>,
"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
"Jacky Huang" <ychuang3@nuvoton.com>,
"Shan-Chun Hung" <schung@nuvoton.com>,
"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>, "Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
"Timur Tabi" <timur@kernel.org>,
"Peter Ujfalusi" <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Patrice Chotard" <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 7/8] serial: 8250: retire canceled RX DMA before reusing the receive buffer
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 09:21:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261109162135.906262-1-rrangel@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261108-submit-serial-8250-dma-cancel-v1-v10-7-e6227ddb95b1@gmail.com>
Hi James,
Thanks for dropping the unused rx_pause_wakeup lines in omap_8250_shutdown()
in v10. Following up here on your question from the v9 7/8 thread:
On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 11:05:42AM -0700, James Hilliard wrote:
> For pause-capable hardware, a recovery timeout does not have to prove
> that the failure is permanent. The concern is what happens after that
> timeout: the current recovery path discards the pending transfer and
> leaves RX on PIO until reopen.
>
> Is there a recovery approach that avoids an indefinite RX stall
> without turning a potentially temporary pause failure into loss of DMA
> for the rest of the open session?
Yes — the only reason the current recovery path disables RX DMA for the
rest of the open session is that serial8250_rx_dma_recover() sets
dma->rx_err = true and serial8250_rx_dma_flush_work() leaves it set
after dmaengine_terminate_sync(dma->rxchan) succeeds, which causes
serial8250_rx_dma() to return -EIO until reopen.
Notice that struct uart_8250_dma already distinguishes a normal
post-pause async termination from an unpaused transfer that needs
synchronous termination:
- When serial8250_rx_dma_try_flush() succeeds, it calls
dmaengine_terminate_async(dma->rxchan), sets dma->rx_terminating =
true, and clears dma->rx_running = 0.
- When serial8250_rx_dma_try_flush() fails, dma->rx_running remains 1.
So we can decouple bounded pause-timeout recovery from sticky PIO
fallback without adding any new struct fields:
1. In serial8250_rx_dma_flush_work(), if retry is still true when the
1-second retry budget expires (or immediately if ret == -ENOSYS ||
ret == -EOPNOTSUPP):
- If ret == -ENOSYS || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP (e.g. Tegra186 where
hw_support_pause is false), call serial8250_rx_dma_recover(p) so
dma->rx_err = true permanently falls back to PIO for the session.
- Otherwise (a pause timeout such as -EAGAIN, -EBUSY, or
-ETIMEDOUT), set dma->rx_terminating = true while keeping
dma->rx_running = 1, dma->rx_pause_pending = true, and
dma->rx_err = false, and set retry = false.
2. Derive recover from persistent state under port->lock:
recover = dma->rx_err || (dma->rx_running && dma->rx_terminating);
fall_back_pio = dma->rx_err;
And in serial8250_rx_dma_recovering() (8250.h):
return up->dma &&
(up->dma->rx_pause_pending ||
((up->dma->rx_err || up->dma->rx_running) &&
up->dma->rx_terminating));
3. In if (recover), run ret = dmaengine_terminate_sync(dma->rxchan):
- While dmaengine_terminate_sync() runs outside port->lock,
serial8250_rx_dma_recovering() is true (keeping RX interrupts
masked in UART_IER and skip_rx = true) and dma->rx_terminating is
true (blocking dma_rx_complete() and serial8250_rx_dma()).
- If dmaengine_terminate_sync(dma->rxchan) fails (ret != 0), latch
dma->rx_err = true under port->lock and return early so RX stays
masked and the buffer stays owned by DMA.
- If dmaengine_terminate_sync(dma->rxchan) succeeds (ret == 0), the
existing post-sync cleanup block clears rx_pause_pending,
rx_terminating, and rx_running and restores UART_IER with
dma->rx_err == false.
Because 8250 RX DMA is armed on-demand when rx_running == 0 and
!rx_err, any trigger-tail bytes remaining in the UART RX FIFO below the
RDI trigger level are drained via PIO on UART_IIR_RX_TIMEOUT, and the
next UART_IIR_RDI interrupt submits a fresh RX DMA descriptor — so RX
DMA remains active for the rest of the open session.
(Regarding the dw-axi-dmac driver mentioned on v10 7/8:
drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c has separate provider
bugs where dw_axi_dma_interrupt() clears CH_INTSTATUS across all
channels including DWAXIDMAC_IRQ_SUSPENDED, dma_chan_pause() leaves
DMAC_CHSUSPREG and chan->is_paused = true set when returning -EAGAIN,
and dma_chan_terminate_all() only clears DMAC_CHEN without clearing
DMAC_CHSUSPREG or chan->is_paused. Those belong in a dw-axi-dmac
driver fix, whereas the non-sticky pause-timeout recovery above ensures
8250_dma.c never stalls RX indefinitely on a pause timeout while
keeping RX DMA enabled for subsequent transfers.)
Thanks,
Raul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-02 23:14 [PATCH v9 0/8] serial: 8250: serialize DMA cancellation with buffer reuse James Hilliard
2026-11-02 23:14 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] serial: 8250_omap: separate locked TX DMA completion processing James Hilliard
2026-11-03 16:10 ` Raul E Rangel
2026-11-02 23:14 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] serial: serialize asynchronous write wakeups with the port lock James Hilliard
2026-11-03 16:10 ` Raul E Rangel
2026-11-03 17:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-03 20:25 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2026-11-02 23:14 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] serial: 8250_omap: serialize RX DMA completion and flushing James Hilliard
2026-11-03 11:55 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-11-03 16:10 ` Raul E Rangel
2026-11-02 23:14 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] serial: 8250_omap: quiesce DMA IRQ handling before shutdown James Hilliard
2026-11-03 16:11 ` Raul E Rangel
2026-11-02 23:14 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] serial: core: allow drivers to reserve flushed transmit storage James Hilliard
2026-11-03 16:11 ` Raul E Rangel
2026-11-03 17:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-02 23:14 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] serial: 8250: drain canceled TX DMA before reusing its buffer James Hilliard
2026-11-03 16:11 ` Raul E Rangel
2026-11-03 17:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-02 23:14 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] serial: 8250: retire canceled RX DMA before reusing the receive buffer James Hilliard
2026-11-03 16:11 ` Raul E Rangel
2026-11-03 18:05 ` James Hilliard
2026-11-09 16:21 ` Raul E Rangel [this message]
2026-11-03 17:33 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-03 17:54 ` James Hilliard
2026-11-03 18:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-03 18:16 ` James Hilliard
2026-11-03 20:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-02 23:14 ` [PATCH v9 8/8] serial: 8250: retain DMA resources when termination fails James Hilliard
2026-11-03 16:11 ` Raul E Rangel
2026-11-03 17:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-09 3:50 [PATCH v10 0/8] serial: 8250: serialize DMA cancellation with buffer reuse James Hilliard
2026-11-09 3:50 ` [PATCH v10 1/8] serial: 8250_omap: separate locked TX DMA completion processing James Hilliard
2026-11-09 3:50 ` [PATCH v10 2/8] serial: serialize asynchronous write wakeups with the port lock James Hilliard
2026-11-09 22:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-09 3:50 ` [PATCH v10 3/8] serial: 8250_omap: serialize RX DMA completion and flushing James Hilliard
2026-11-09 3:50 ` [PATCH v10 4/8] serial: 8250_omap: quiesce DMA IRQ handling before shutdown James Hilliard
2026-11-09 3:50 ` [PATCH v10 5/8] serial: core: allow drivers to reserve flushed transmit storage James Hilliard
2026-11-09 3:50 ` [PATCH v10 6/8] serial: 8250: drain canceled TX DMA before reusing its buffer James Hilliard
2026-11-09 3:50 ` [PATCH v10 7/8] serial: 8250: retire canceled RX DMA before reusing the receive buffer James Hilliard
2026-11-09 3:50 ` [PATCH v10 8/8] serial: 8250: retain DMA resources when termination fails James Hilliard
2026-11-09 16:21 ` Raul E Rangel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261109162135.906262-1-rrangel@chromium.org \
--to=rrangel@chromium.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=james.hilliard1@gmail.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=richard.genoud@bootlin.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=schung@nuvoton.com \
--cc=timur@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=ychuang3@nuvoton.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®