mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: "Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH-next v2 3/5] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect partition invalidation logic in cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks()
Date: Mon,  9 Nov 2026 14:09:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261109190955.1398611-4-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109190955.1398611-1-longman@redhat.com>

When most of the active CPUs of a system are allocated to
sub-partitions below the top_cpuset partition, it is possible that a
CPU offline operation may remove the last active CPU in the top_cpuset
partition. When that really happens, cpuset_handle_hotplug() will clear
the subpartitions_cpus to make sure active CPUs are present in the top
partition and let the other sub-partitions get invalidated and then
competes for their exclusive CPUs again.

In cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(), the current code use
"cpumask_empty(subpartitions_cpus)" to determine if that partition
should be invalidated. That is fine if there is only one sub-partition.
As reported by sashiko that when there are more than one sub-partitions
and the first sub-partition will get invalidated and then it will
try to acquire the exclusive CPUs and become valid again. When this
happens, the subpartitions_cpus will no longer be empty. The remaining
sub-partitions will assume their exclusive CPUs are safe and proceed
as normal. As a result, active CPUs owned by those sub-partitions
remain in both top_cpuset.effective_cpus and the sub-partitions'
effective_cpus while missing from subpartitions_cpus, breaking partition
CPU exclusivity and triggering WARN_ON_ONCE() in generate_sched_domains()
and remote_partition_disable().

Fix that by checking if the sub-partitions' effective_xcpus are subset
of subpartitions_cpus to determine if they should be invalidated. Also
remove the obsolete WARN_ON_ONCE() call in remote_partition_disable().

Fixes: 0c7f293efc87 ("cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective for v2")
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-bf69cd3c-833a-4599-a1f9-8dd9e044cd7c
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 19 +++++--------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 3955d2d574cf..e9b84671af21 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -1766,15 +1766,6 @@ static int remote_partition_enable(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs,
 static void remote_partition_disable(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_remote_partition(cs));
-	/*
-	 * When a CPU is offlined, top_cpuset may end up with no available CPUs,
-	 * which should clear subpartitions_cpus. We should not emit a warning for this
-	 * scenario: the hierarchy is updated from top to bottom, so subpartitions_cpus
-	 * may already be cleared when disabling the partition.
-	 */
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_subset(cs->effective_xcpus, subpartitions_cpus) &&
-		     !cpumask_empty(subpartitions_cpus));
-
 	spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
 	cs->remote_partition = false;
 	partition_xcpus_del(cs->partition_root_state, NULL, cs->effective_xcpus);
@@ -4020,9 +4011,9 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
 	 * or update_parent_effective_cpumask() is called as cs->effective_cpus
 	 * may have been updated.
 	 */
-	if (is_remote_partition(cs) && (cpumask_empty(subpartitions_cpus) ||
-				       (cpumask_empty(&new_cpus) &&
-					partition_is_populated(cs, NULL)))) {
+	if (is_remote_partition(cs) &&
+	    (!cpumask_subset(cs->effective_xcpus, subpartitions_cpus) ||
+	     (cpumask_empty(&new_cpus) && partition_is_populated(cs, NULL)))) {
 		WRITE_ONCE(cs->prs_err, PERR_HOTPLUG);
 		remote_partition_disable(cs, tmp);
 		compute_effective_cpumask(&new_cpus, cs, parent);
@@ -4035,12 +4026,12 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
 	 * 1) empty effective cpus but not valid empty partition.
 	 * 2) parent is invalid or doesn't grant any cpus to child
 	 *    partitions.
-	 * 3) subpartitions_cpus is empty.
+	 * 3) effective_xcpus isn't a subset of subpartitions_cpus.
 	 */
 	if (is_local_partition(cs) &&
 	    (!is_partition_valid(parent) ||
 	     tasks_nocpu_error(parent, cs, &new_cpus) ||
-	     cpumask_empty(subpartitions_cpus)))
+	     !cpumask_subset(cs->effective_xcpus, subpartitions_cpus)))
 		partcmd = partcmd_invalidate;
 	/*
 	 * On the other hand, an invalid partition root may be transitioned
-- 
2.56.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-09 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-09 19:09 [PATCH-next v2 0/5] More fix patches Waiman Long
2026-11-09 19:09 ` [PATCH-next v2 1/5] selftests/cgroup: Fix "test_cpuset_prs.sh -v" failures Waiman Long
2026-11-09 19:09 ` [PATCH-next v2 2/5] cgroup/cpuset: Correctly set cpus_updated in cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() Waiman Long
2026-11-09 19:09 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-11-09 19:09 ` [PATCH-next v2 4/5] cgroup/cpuset: Protect current->mems_allowed read in cpuset_fork() Waiman Long
2026-11-09 19:09 ` [PATCH-next v2 5/5] cgroup/cpuset: Correctly set isolated_cpus when switching partition state Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261109190955.1398611-4-longman@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®