From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: "Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH-next v2 4/5] cgroup/cpuset: Protect current->mems_allowed read in cpuset_fork()
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 14:09:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261109190955.1398611-5-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109190955.1398611-1-longman@redhat.com>
Reading mems_allowed of the current task outside of cpuset_mutex critical
section should be protected by using mems_allowed_seq seqlock as the
nodemask can be updated concurrently leading to a torn read. Such
protection is currently not implemented in cpuset_fork() for the
!CLONE_INTO_CGROUP case. As a result, the child task may inherit an empty
or corrupted mems_allowed nodemask. This violates NUMA memory policy
constraints and causes subsequent page allocations to unconditionally
fail, potentially leading to crashes or spurious OOM killer invocations
for the child task.
Fix that by using a read_mems_allowed_begin/read_mems_allowed_retry()
loop to protect the mems_allowed read.
Fixes: 06f4e9489891 ("cpuset: make sure new tasks conform to the current config of the cpuset")
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-601100b4-fa77-45fd-99f9-bfbd4385201f
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index e9b84671af21..7aa614c6ac4d 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -3868,11 +3868,20 @@ static void cpuset_fork(struct task_struct *task)
rcu_read_unlock();
if (cs == oldcs) {
+ unsigned int seq;
+
if (cs == &top_cpuset)
return;
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, current->cpus_ptr);
- task->mems_allowed = current->mems_allowed;
+ /*
+ * A cpuset.mems update can update current->mems_allowed
+ * concurrently, so retry it again if it really happens.
+ */
+ do {
+ seq = read_mems_allowed_begin();
+ task->mems_allowed = current->mems_allowed;
+ } while (read_mems_allowed_retry(seq));
return;
}
--
2.56.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 19:09 [PATCH-next v2 0/5] More fix patches Waiman Long
2026-11-09 19:09 ` [PATCH-next v2 1/5] selftests/cgroup: Fix "test_cpuset_prs.sh -v" failures Waiman Long
2026-11-09 19:09 ` [PATCH-next v2 2/5] cgroup/cpuset: Correctly set cpus_updated in cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() Waiman Long
2026-11-09 19:09 ` [PATCH-next v2 3/5] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect partition invalidation logic " Waiman Long
2026-11-09 19:09 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-11-09 19:09 ` [PATCH-next v2 5/5] cgroup/cpuset: Correctly set isolated_cpus when switching partition state Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261109190955.1398611-5-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®