* [PATCH net RESEND] net/mlx5e: kTLS, Fix missing error unwind when enabling RX offload
@ 2026-11-10 10:17 Tariq Toukan
2026-11-10 10:22 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tariq Toukan @ 2026-11-10 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
netdev, Paolo Abeni
Cc: Boris Pismenny, Gal Pressman, Leon Romanovsky, open list,
linux-rdma, Mark Bloch, Saeed Mahameed, Simon Horman,
Tariq Toukan, William Tu, Xuanqiang Luo
From: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>
Since commit abed42f9cd80 ("net/mlx5e: Conditionally create async
ICOSQ"), the async ICOSQ is only created when an XDP program is attached
or priv->ktls_rx_was_enabled is set. When TLS RX offload is enabled for
the first time, mlx5e_ktls_set_feature_rx() sets the flag and reopens
the channels so that they get the queue, but it ignores the return value
of mlx5e_safe_reopen_channels().
If the reopen fails, mlx5e_safe_switch_params() keeps the old channels,
which have no async ICOSQ, while NETIF_F_HW_TLS_RX is still reported as
enabled. The next offloaded RX connection then dereferences the NULL
c->async_icosq in post_rx_param_wqes(). Enabling the feature again does
not help, as the flag is already set and the reopen is skipped.
Propagate the error, clear the flag and destroy the accel TCP flow
tables again, so that the feature stays disabled and the next attempt
retries the reopen.
Fixes: abed42f9cd80 ("net/mlx5e: Conditionally create async ICOSQ")
Signed-off-by: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls.c
index 337201f12895..3cc1213c2f68 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls.c
@@ -139,7 +139,11 @@ int mlx5e_ktls_set_feature_rx(struct net_device *netdev, bool enable)
err = mlx5e_accel_fs_tcp_create(priv->fs);
if (!err && !priv->ktls_rx_was_enabled) {
priv->ktls_rx_was_enabled = true;
- mlx5e_safe_reopen_channels(priv);
+ err = mlx5e_safe_reopen_channels(priv);
+ if (err) {
+ priv->ktls_rx_was_enabled = false;
+ mlx5e_accel_fs_tcp_destroy(priv->fs);
+ }
}
} else {
mlx5e_accel_fs_tcp_destroy(priv->fs);
base-commit: b71c101bbb9814d163c00234d43c41f0a17907d4
--
2.44.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net RESEND] net/mlx5e: kTLS, Fix missing error unwind when enabling RX offload
2026-11-10 10:17 [PATCH net RESEND] net/mlx5e: kTLS, Fix missing error unwind when enabling RX offload Tariq Toukan
@ 2026-11-10 10:22 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: netdev-bot+sinfo @ 2026-11-10 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tariq Toukan
Cc: Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
netdev, Paolo Abeni, Boris Pismenny, Gal Pressman,
Leon Romanovsky, open list, linux-rdma, Mark Bloch,
Saeed Mahameed, Simon Horman, William Tu, Xuanqiang Luo
Hi!
This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
commit messages seem to be missing some information:
- How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during
development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static
analysis tool scan.
- Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
(e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.
- What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please
mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for
testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware.
Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
then.
The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
that is the case please reply and explain.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-10 10:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-10 10:17 [PATCH net RESEND] net/mlx5e: kTLS, Fix missing error unwind when enabling RX offload Tariq Toukan
2026-11-10 10:22 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®