* linux-next: build failure after merge of the pmdomain-fixes tree
@ 2026-11-10 16:33 Mark Brown
2026-11-10 17:02 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2026-11-10 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ulf Hansson; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5004 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the pmdomain-fixes tree, today's linux-next build
(arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/device.h:32,
from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/platform_device.h:13,
from /tmp/next/build/drivers/pmdomain/imx/gpc.c:11:
/tmp/next/build/drivers/pmdomain/imx/gpc.c: In function 'imx_gpc_remove':
/tmp/next/build/drivers/pmdomain/imx/gpc.c:554:25: error: invalid storage class for function 'imx_gpc_driver_init'
554 | builtin_platform_driver(imx_gpc_driver)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/device/driver.h:294:19: note: in definition of macro 'builtin_driver'
294 | static int __init __driver##_init(void) \
| ^~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/drivers/pmdomain/imx/gpc.c:554:1: note: in expansion of macro 'builtin_platform_driver'
554 | builtin_platform_driver(imx_gpc_driver)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/printk.h:6,
from /tmp/next/build/include/asm-generic/bug.h:31,
from /tmp/next/build/arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/bug.h:5,
from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/instrumented.h:10,
from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:17,
from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/atomic.h:82,
from /tmp/next/build/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h:5,
from /tmp/next/build/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h:245,
from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/bitops.h:67,
from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/kernel.h:23,
from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/clk.h:13,
from /tmp/next/build/drivers/pmdomain/imx/gpc.c:7:
/tmp/next/build/drivers/pmdomain/imx/gpc.c:554:25: error: initializer element is not constant
554 | builtin_platform_driver(imx_gpc_driver)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/init.h:265:55: note: in definition of macro '____define_initcall'
265 | __attribute__((__section__(__sec))) = fn;
| ^~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/init.h:275:9: note: in expansion of macro '__unique_initcall'
275 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/init.h:277:35: note: in expansion of macro '___define_initcall'
277 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/init.h:306:41: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall'
306 | #define device_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 6)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/device/driver.h:298:1: note: in expansion of macro 'device_initcall'
298 | device_initcall(__driver##_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/platform_device.h:345:9: note: in expansion of macro 'builtin_driver'
345 | builtin_driver(__platform_driver, platform_driver_register)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/drivers/pmdomain/imx/gpc.c:554:1: note: in expansion of macro 'builtin_platform_driver'
554 | builtin_platform_driver(imx_gpc_driver)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/init.h:176:30: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input
176 | #define THIS_MODULE ((struct module *)0)
| ^~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/platform_device.h:304:41: note: in expansion of macro 'THIS_MODULE'
304 | __platform_driver_register(drv, THIS_MODULE, KBUILD_MODNAME)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/device/driver.h:296:16: note: in expansion of macro 'platform_driver_register'
296 | return __register(&(__driver) , ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/platform_device.h:345:9: note: in expansion of macro 'builtin_driver'
345 | builtin_driver(__platform_driver, platform_driver_register)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/drivers/pmdomain/imx/gpc.c:554:1: note: in expansion of macro 'builtin_platform_driver'
554 | builtin_platform_driver(imx_gpc_driver)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/drivers/pmdomain/imx/gpc.c: At top level:
/tmp/next/build/drivers/pmdomain/imx/gpc.c:503:13: warning: 'imx_gpc_remove' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
503 | static void imx_gpc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
AFAICT this is caused by commit
d7262971a2acc (pmdomain: imx: gpc: remove all initialized power domains)
though I don't really see how. I have used the tree from next-20261109
instead.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pmdomain-fixes tree
2026-11-10 16:33 linux-next: build failure after merge of the pmdomain-fixes tree Mark Brown
@ 2026-11-10 17:02 ` Sasha Levin
2026-11-10 17:07 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-11-10 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: Ulf Hansson, Ulf Hansson, Guangshuo Li, Andy Shevchenko,
linux-pm, imx, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List
On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 04:33:47PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>AFAICT this is caused by commit
>
> d7262971a2acc (pmdomain: imx: gpc: remove all initialized power domains)
>
>though I don't really see how. I have used the tree from next-20261109
>instead.
The while loop that commit adds to imx_gpc_remove() is never closed, so
the function is still open at the end of the file:
while (num_domains--) {
ret = pm_genpd_remove(&imx_gpc_domains[num_domains].base);
if (ret) {
...
return;
}
if (num_domains == GPC_PGC_DOMAIN_PU)
imx_pgc_put_clocks(&imx_gpc_domains[num_domains]);
}
The patch was posted that way [1]. gpc.c is only built with
HAVE_IMX_GPC, which only SOC_IMX6 on 32-bit ARM selects, so x86 and
arm64 builds do not see it.
With the brace added, gpc.o builds with imx_v6_v7_defconfig:
--- a/drivers/pmdomain/imx/gpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pmdomain/imx/gpc.c
@@ -536,8 +536,9 @@
return;
}
- if (num_domains == GPC_PGC_DOMAIN_PU)
- imx_pgc_put_clocks(&imx_gpc_domains[num_domains]);
+ if (num_domains == GPC_PGC_DOMAIN_PU)
+ imx_pgc_put_clocks(&imx_gpc_domains[num_domains]);
+ }
}
of_node_put(pgc_node);
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260924142520.1594149-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com/
--
Thanks,
Sasha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pmdomain-fixes tree
2026-11-10 17:02 ` Sasha Levin
@ 2026-11-10 17:07 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2026-11-10 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Levin
Cc: Ulf Hansson, Ulf Hansson, Guangshuo Li, Andy Shevchenko,
linux-pm, imx, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 509 bytes --]
On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 12:02:53PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 04:33:47PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> >AFAICT this is caused by commit
> >
> > d7262971a2acc (pmdomain: imx: gpc: remove all initialized power domains)
> >
> >though I don't really see how. I have used the tree from next-20261109
> >instead.
> The while loop that commit adds to imx_gpc_remove() is never closed, so
> the function is still open at the end of the file:
Ah, that'd do it. I didn't look terribly hard.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-10 17:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-10 16:33 linux-next: build failure after merge of the pmdomain-fixes tree Mark Brown
2026-11-10 17:02 ` Sasha Levin
2026-11-10 17:07 ` Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®