From: Jesse Casco <jesse.casco@gmail.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: glymur: use polling mode for SCMI transfers
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 15:05:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261110200511.71673-1-jesse.casco@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEaxeoQUZKnCQPG_W0B77gB2VfC__-t7ZxY0mkVsqm1Q9pk6hw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Konrad, Sibi,
I tracked down the timing issue on the ASUS Zenbook A16 (7.4-rc1 based,
arm,no-completion-irq removed). It depends on whether PSCI cpuidle is
already running when SCMI sends its first PERF (0x13) message:
- CPUCP_MBOX=y: first PERF message at 0.37 s, before cpuidle starts.
PERF works for the whole boot, cpuidle included.
- CPUCP_MBOX=m (arm64 defconfig): first PERF message at 1.1-1.4 s,
after cpuidle starts. No PERF reply ever gets a doorbell, so
scmi-cpufreq and scmi-perf-domain fail with -110. BASE replies still
ring.
- CPUCP_MBOX=m with cpuidle.off=1: PERF works.
In the failing case the firmware still writes the PERF replies (the
same request through SCMI RAW message_poll returns status 0), but
RX_MBOX_STAT never gets a bit, with EN=0x3 and MAP=~0, the same as in
the working case. So it looks like the CPUCP decides at the first PERF
exchange whether to ring for PERF, rather than a mailbox driver bug.
Please consider the DT patch withdrawn. Sibi, is this a known CPUCP
firmware behavior? In the meantime I could send an arm64 defconfig
change building QCOM_CPUCP_MBOX in, so defconfig kernels get cpufreq on
this machine, if that's acceptable.
Jesse
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 17:22 Jesse Casco
2026-08-18 9:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-08-19 14:52 ` Jesse Casco
2026-11-10 20:05 ` Jesse Casco [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261110200511.71673-1-jesse.casco@gmail.com \
--to=jesse.casco@gmail.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®