* [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net: stmmac: fpe: pmac and fprq fixes
@ 2026-11-04 8:12 muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
2026-11-04 8:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net: stmmac: fpe: Enforce pmac_enabled in set_mm and keep it on at init muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
2026-11-04 8:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: stmmac: fpe: Move fprq configuration to stmmac_fpe_configure_pmac() muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade @ 2026-11-04 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: Maxime Chevallier, Andrew Lunn, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue,
Rohan G Thomas, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
From: Nazim Amirul <muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com>
Two fixes for the stmmac FPE implementation:
- Keep pmac_enabled true in DWMAC since the preemptive MAC is always
on, enforce this in set_mm(), and only initialize it when FPE is
actually supported
- Move fprq configuration to stmmac_fpe_configure_pmac() where it
belongs
v3:
- Rework stmmac_fpe_init(): gate the pmac_enabled initialization on
stmmac_fpe_supported() and return early otherwise, so hardware
without FPE (dma_cap.fpesel clear) no longer gets pmac_enabled set.
This folds in the v2 "Add missing return in stmmac_fpe_init()" patch
and fixes the condition that did not reach its intended effect, per
Paolo Abeni / Sashiko. The separate patch 2/3 from v2 is dropped.
- v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260803032358.16282-1-muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com/
v2:
- Drop u32_replace_bits() in the fprq patch; fprq_mask is not a
compile-time constant and triggered a __bad_mask build error on x86.
Keep the open-coded mask/shift update instead.
Nazim Amirul (2):
net: stmmac: fpe: Enforce pmac_enabled in set_mm and keep it on at
init
net: stmmac: fpe: Move fprq configuration to
stmmac_fpe_configure_pmac()
.../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c | 7 ++++
.../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_fpe.c | 37 ++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--
2.43.7
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net: stmmac: fpe: Enforce pmac_enabled in set_mm and keep it on at init
2026-11-04 8:12 [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net: stmmac: fpe: pmac and fprq fixes muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
@ 2026-11-04 8:12 ` muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
2026-11-10 20:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-11-04 8:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: stmmac: fpe: Move fprq configuration to stmmac_fpe_configure_pmac() muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade @ 2026-11-04 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: Maxime Chevallier, Andrew Lunn, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue,
Rohan G Thomas, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
From: Nazim Amirul <muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com>
The preemptive MAC in DWMAC is always enabled, meaning DWMAC is always
ready to receive preemptive mPackets. Initialize pmac_enabled to true
at init time and reject attempts to disable it via ethtool set_mm.
Only initialize pmac_enabled when FPE is actually supported: gate it on
stmmac_fpe_supported() and return early otherwise, so hardware without
FPE (dma_cap.fpesel clear) does not get pmac_enabled set. Keep emitting
the "FPE is not supported by driver" notice for the case where the
hardware advertises FPE but the driver cannot wire it up.
Also add a missing fpesel capability check in stmmac_set_mm() to return
-EOPNOTSUPP early on hardware without FPE support.
Signed-off-by: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@altera.com>
Signed-off-by: Nazim Amirul <muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
---
v3: Gate the pmac_enabled init on stmmac_fpe_supported() and return
early, so hardware without FPE no longer gets pmac_enabled set. This
folds in the previous "Add missing return in stmmac_fpe_init()" patch
and fixes the condition that did not reach its intended effect, per
Paolo Abeni / Sashiko.
v2: No changes. Collect Reviewed-by from Maxime Chevallier.
.../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c | 7 +++++++
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_fpe.c | 13 ++++++++++---
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
index c616a1c95e5d..0dfb312d72f1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
@@ -1066,6 +1066,13 @@ static int stmmac_set_mm(struct net_device *ndev, struct ethtool_mm_cfg *cfg,
if (err)
return err;
+ if (!priv->dma_cap.fpesel)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ /* DWMAC always have preemptible MAC enabled */
+ if (!cfg->pmac_enabled)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
stmmac_fpe_set_add_frag_size(priv, frag_size);
ethtool_mmsv_set_mm(&priv->fpe_cfg.mmsv, cfg);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_fpe.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_fpe.c
index b6b5ef7c8fc4..2607e29930b7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_fpe.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_fpe.c
@@ -173,9 +173,16 @@ void stmmac_fpe_init(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
ethtool_mmsv_init(&priv->fpe_cfg.mmsv, priv->dev,
&stmmac_mmsv_ops);
- if ((!priv->fpe_cfg.reg || !priv->hw->mac->fpe_map_preemption_class) &&
- priv->dma_cap.fpesel)
- dev_info(priv->device, "FPE is not supported by driver.\n");
+ if (!stmmac_fpe_supported(priv)) {
+ if (priv->dma_cap.fpesel)
+ dev_info(priv->device, "FPE is not supported by driver.\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* The preemptive MAC in DWMAC is always enabled, so initialize
+ * pmac_enabled to true to reflect the hardware state.
+ */
+ priv->fpe_cfg.mmsv.pmac_enabled = true;
}
int stmmac_fpe_get_add_frag_size(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
--
2.43.7
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: stmmac: fpe: Move fprq configuration to stmmac_fpe_configure_pmac()
2026-11-04 8:12 [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net: stmmac: fpe: pmac and fprq fixes muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
2026-11-04 8:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net: stmmac: fpe: Enforce pmac_enabled in set_mm and keep it on at init muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
@ 2026-11-04 8:12 ` muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade @ 2026-11-04 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: Maxime Chevallier, Andrew Lunn, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue,
Rohan G Thomas, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
From: Nazim Amirul <muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com>
The Frame Preemption Residue Queue (fprq) controls which Rx queue
receives residual preemptive mPackets from the pmac. This is a pmac
concern, not a TX concern, so move its configuration from
stmmac_fpe_configure_tx() to stmmac_fpe_configure_pmac() where it
logically belongs.
Keep the open-coded mask/shift update rather than u32_replace_bits(),
since fprq_mask is not a compile-time constant.
Signed-off-by: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@altera.com>
Signed-off-by: Nazim Amirul <muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
---
v3: No changes. Was patch 3/3 in v2.
v2: Drop u32_replace_bits(); fprq_mask is not a compile-time constant and
triggered a __bad_mask build error on x86. Keep the open-coded
mask/shift update instead, per Maxime Chevallier and Jakub Kicinski.
.../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_fpe.c | 24 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_fpe.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_fpe.c
index 2607e29930b7..cb153857077f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_fpe.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_fpe.c
@@ -47,20 +47,13 @@ static void stmmac_fpe_configure_tx(struct ethtool_mmsv *mmsv, bool tx_enable)
struct stmmac_fpe_cfg *cfg = container_of(mmsv, struct stmmac_fpe_cfg, mmsv);
struct stmmac_priv *priv = container_of(cfg, struct stmmac_priv, fpe_cfg);
const struct stmmac_fpe_reg *reg = cfg->reg;
- u32 num_rxq = priv->plat->rx_queues_to_use;
void __iomem *ioaddr = priv->ioaddr;
- u32 value;
- if (tx_enable) {
+ if (tx_enable)
cfg->fpe_csr = STMMAC_MAC_FPE_CTRL_STS_EFPE;
- value = readl(ioaddr + reg->rxq_ctrl1_reg);
- value &= ~reg->fprq_mask;
- /* Keep this SHIFT, FIELD_PREP() expects a constant mask :-/ */
- value |= (num_rxq - 1) << __ffs(reg->fprq_mask);
- writel(value, ioaddr + reg->rxq_ctrl1_reg);
- } else {
+ else
cfg->fpe_csr = 0;
- }
+
writel(cfg->fpe_csr, ioaddr + reg->mac_fpe_reg);
}
@@ -68,10 +61,11 @@ static void stmmac_fpe_configure_pmac(struct ethtool_mmsv *mmsv, bool pmac_enabl
{
struct stmmac_fpe_cfg *cfg = container_of(mmsv, struct stmmac_fpe_cfg, mmsv);
struct stmmac_priv *priv = container_of(cfg, struct stmmac_priv, fpe_cfg);
+ u32 num_rxq = priv->plat->rx_queues_to_use;
const struct stmmac_fpe_reg *reg = cfg->reg;
void __iomem *ioaddr = priv->ioaddr;
unsigned long flags;
- u32 value;
+ u32 value, value_2;
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->hw->irq_ctrl_lock, flags);
value = readl(ioaddr + reg->int_en_reg);
@@ -83,6 +77,14 @@ static void stmmac_fpe_configure_pmac(struct ethtool_mmsv *mmsv, bool pmac_enabl
value |= reg->int_en_bit;
}
+ /* Frame Preemption Residue Queue is the Rx Queue to which
+ * residual preemptive mPackets must be forwarded from the pmac.
+ */
+ value_2 = readl(ioaddr + reg->rxq_ctrl1_reg);
+ value_2 &= ~reg->fprq_mask;
+ /* Keep this SHIFT, FIELD_PREP() expects a constant mask :-/ */
+ value_2 |= (num_rxq - 1) << __ffs(reg->fprq_mask);
+ writel(value_2, ioaddr + reg->rxq_ctrl1_reg);
} else {
value &= ~reg->int_en_bit;
}
--
2.43.7
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net: stmmac: fpe: Enforce pmac_enabled in set_mm and keep it on at init
2026-11-04 8:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net: stmmac: fpe: Enforce pmac_enabled in set_mm and keep it on at init muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
@ 2026-11-10 20:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2026-11-10 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
Cc: Jakub Kicinski, netdev, maxime.chevallier, andrew+netdev, davem,
edumazet, pabeni, mcoquelin.stm32, alexandre.torgue,
rohan.g.thomas, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
net: stmmac: fpe: Enforce pmac_enabled in set_mm and keep it on at init
This patch sets the FPE pMAC state to enabled in stmmac_fpe_init() when
FPE is supported. It also makes stmmac_set_mm() reject requests that try
to disable the pMAC, and adds an fpesel capability check to
stmmac_set_mm().
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
> index c616a1c95e5dd..0dfb312d72f15 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
> @@ -1066,6 +1066,13 @@ static int stmmac_set_mm(struct net_device *ndev, struct ethtool_mm_cfg *cfg,
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + if (!priv->dma_cap.fpesel)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
[Severity: Low]
The commit message says:
Also add a missing fpesel capability check in stmmac_set_mm() to return
-EOPNOTSUPP early on hardware without FPE support.
Can this check ever be reached? The only caller of ->set_mm() is
ethnl_set_mm(). It calls ->get_mm() first and returns if that fails:
net/ethtool/mm.c:ethnl_set_mm() {
...
ret = dev->ethtool_ops->get_mm(dev, &state);
if (ret)
return ret;
...
ret = dev->ethtool_ops->set_mm(dev, &cfg, extack);
...
}
stmmac_get_mm() already rejects this case with a stricter test:
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c:stmmac_get_mm() {
...
if (!stmmac_fpe_supported(priv))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
...
}
stmmac_fpe_supported() checks fpesel && fpe_cfg.reg &&
fpe_map_preemption_class. So stmmac_set_mm() is never called when fpesel
is clear.
The new test is also weaker than stmmac_fpe_supported(), which this same
patch uses in stmmac_fpe_init(). Suppose fpesel is set but the driver has
no FPE register map. Even if this check could run, it would not stop
stmmac_fpe_set_add_frag_size() from dereferencing a NULL fpe_cfg.reg.
Should this check be dropped or changed to use stmmac_fpe_supported(),
with the commit message updated to match?
> + /* DWMAC always have preemptible MAC enabled */
> + if (!cfg->pmac_enabled)
> + return -EINVAL;
[Severity: Medium]
Does this change the ethtool MM uAPI behaviour in a way that breaks
existing users?
Before this patch, pmac-enabled off had a real effect on stmmac.
ethtool_mmsv_event_handle() does not send Respond mPackets while the pMAC
is disabled:
net/ethtool/mm.c:ethtool_mmsv_event_handle() {
...
if (!mmsv->pmac_enabled)
goto unlock;
...
}
stmmac_fpe_configure_pmac(false) also masks the FPE interrupt. Now
stmmac_fpe_init() sets pmac_enabled to true and nothing can clear it. On
every link-up the FPE IRQ is unmasked, and the device answers any link
partner's Verify mPacket.
The rejection also happens before ethtool_mmsv_set_mm() runs, so the
whole request is dropped. ethnl_set_mm() only rejects tx_enabled combined
with !pmac_enabled, so a request like this one reaches stmmac_set_mm():
ethtool --set-mm $dev pmac-enabled off tx-enabled off verify-enabled off
It gets -EINVAL, and tx_enabled and verify_enabled stay unchanged.
h1_destroy() and h2_destroy() in
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/ethtool_mm.sh use exactly this
request. The lldp test has lldpad enable MM TX, and afterwards the cleanup
cannot clear tx-enabled or verify-enabled on stmmac.
manual_failed_verification() in the same script relies on this command to
make the peer's verification fail:
ethtool --set-mm $rx pmac-enabled off
The script does not check its exit code, so the rx side keeps
pmac_enabled set. If the DWMAC still sends a Respond mPacket in that
state, verification succeeds and check_fail fires. Whether the hardware
does that could not be confirmed from the code.
The other set_mm implementations in drivers/net (enetc, ocelot,
am65-cpsw) accept pmac_enabled=false. Would it be better to keep
accepting it here as well?
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but stmmac_set_mm() is passed an extack and this new
-EINVAL leaves it empty. The other rejections on the ETHTOOL_MSG_MM_SET
path all set a message. For example, in ethnl_set_mm():
if (cfg.tx_enabled && !cfg.pmac_enabled) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "TX enabled requires pMAC enabled");
return -EINVAL;
}
ethtool_mm_frag_size_min_to_add(), called a few lines earlier in
stmmac_set_mm(), fills in extack too.
Userspace gets a plain "Invalid argument" for a bool that the uAPI
documents as settable. Could something like
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "pMAC cannot be disabled on DWMAC") be added
here?
> +
> stmmac_fpe_set_add_frag_size(priv, frag_size);
> ethtool_mmsv_set_mm(&priv->fpe_cfg.mmsv, cfg);
[ ... ]
--
pw-bot: cr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-10 20:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-04 8:12 [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net: stmmac: fpe: pmac and fprq fixes muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
2026-11-04 8:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net: stmmac: fpe: Enforce pmac_enabled in set_mm and keep it on at init muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
2026-11-10 20:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-11-04 8:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: stmmac: fpe: Move fprq configuration to stmmac_fpe_configure_pmac() muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®