From: "Xu Xin (vivo)" <xu.xin@linux.dev>
To: david@kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, chengming.zhou@linux.dev,
link@vivo.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, ljs@kernel.org, tujinjiang@huawei.com,
xiao.wang@vivo.com, xu.xin@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ksm: skip rmap_item allocation for non-zero pages under only_merge_zero_pages
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 17:36:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261111093657.123292-1-xu.xin@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5445434f-078f-47d8-9851-dcc3712d18f1@kernel.org>
> I think we should get rid of any rmap items when merging the shared zeropage
> only. That might require more changes to the ksm code, but it really doesn't
> make any sense to have rmap items.
>
> Maybe we just want a separate KSM infrastrcture that only focuses on
> deduplciating shared zeropages in KSM: get a page, see if it is zero-filled. If
> so, try deduplciating with the shared zeropage. Done.
>
> Mangling this into the existing infrastructure might look easier but it just
> adds things like additional zero-page comparisons and (as Lorenzo points out)
> makes the code harder to understand + maintain.
Makes sense, I agree.
I actually thought about doing it this way at first, but went with the
current approach since it looked simpler back then. Without needing any
rmap_item tracking for zero pages, we can avoid rewriting scan_get_next_rmap_item()
with more complexities.
Splitting them up has two obvious wins:
1. ksm_do_scan() becomes much easier to read:
if (only_merge_zero_pages) {
scan_get_empty_page();
try_to_merge_with_zero_pages();
} else {
/* existing logic */
}
2. We can even add better filtering in scan_get_empty_page() to speed up
empty page scanning, without making scan_get_next_rmap_item() even messier.
That's a very constructive suggestion. I'll rework v3 this way.
Thanks,
Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 7:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] KSM: introduce only_merge_zero_pages Xu Xin (vivo)
2026-11-10 7:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] ksm: add only_merge_zero_pages to merge only empty anonymous pages Xu Xin (vivo)
2026-11-10 7:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] ksm: skip rmap_item allocation for non-zero pages under only_merge_zero_pages Xu Xin (vivo)
2026-11-10 10:05 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-10 11:22 ` Xu Xin (vivo)
2026-11-10 12:42 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-11 8:36 ` Xu Xin (vivo)
2026-11-11 8:48 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-11 9:04 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-11 9:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-11 9:36 ` Xu Xin (vivo) [this message]
2026-11-10 7:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/ksm: consolidate ksm_stat readers into ksm_get_self_stat() Xu Xin (vivo)
2026-11-10 7:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/ksm: add test for only_merge_zero_pages Xu Xin (vivo)
2026-11-11 9:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] ksm: add only_merge_zero_pages to merge only empty anonymous pages David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-10 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] KSM: introduce only_merge_zero_pages Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-10 11:34 ` Xu Xin (vivo)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261111093657.123292-1-xu.xin@linux.dev \
--to=xu.xin@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=link@vivo.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=tujinjiang@huawei.com \
--cc=xiao.wang@vivo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®