From: Guilherme Giacomo Simoes <trintaeoitogc@gmail.com>
To: trintaeoitogc@gmail.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, bvanassche@acm.org, josef@toxicpanda.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nbd@other.debian.org,
syzbot+d7d72f3d467710442af0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nbd: fix circular lock dependency
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 09:24:26 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261111122426.225742-1-trintaeoitogc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111101919.215767-1-trintaeoitogc@gmail.com>
Guilherme Giacomo Simoes <trintaeoitogc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Additionally, reclassifying the socket in nbd_get_socket() happens
> > before it is known whether NBD will use the socket. If
> > nbd_genl_reconnect_sock_cb() does not find a dead connection, or if
> > nbd_add_socket() fails, the socket is returned to user space with the
> > NBD lock class. While this only affects lockdep and while the
> > nbd_add_socket() error paths already behave this way, it is another
> > reason to only reclassify a socket once it is really being used.
> current the nbd_reclassify_socket() is called just below nbd_get_socket() call
> inside nbd_add_socket():
> ```
> sock = nbd_get_socket(nbd, arg, &err);
> if (!sock)
> return err;
> nbd_reclassify_socket(sock);
> ```
>
> what have exactly same effect that call at end of nbd_get_socket(). I guess
> that "reclassify a socket once it is really being used" must be done putting
> nbd_reclassify_socket at end of nbd_add_socket() (before put_socket tag).
> Maybe something like:
> ```
> static int nbd_add_socket(struct nbd_device *nbd, unsigned long arg,
> bool netlink)
> {
> struct nbd_config *config = nbd->config;
> struct socket *sock;
> struct nbd_sock **socks;
> struct nbd_sock *nsock;
> int err;
>
> /* Arg will be cast to int, check it to avoid overflow */
> if (arg > INT_MAX)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (nbd->pid) {
> dev_err(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk),
> "Cannot add socket to a running device\n");
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> sock = nbd_get_socket(nbd, arg, &err);
> if (!sock)
> return err;
>
> if (!netlink && !nbd->task_setup &&
> !test_bit(NBD_RT_BOUND, &config->runtime_flags))
> nbd->task_setup = current;
>
> if (!netlink &&
> (nbd->task_setup != current ||
> test_bit(NBD_RT_BOUND, &config->runtime_flags))) {
> dev_err(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk),
> "Device being setup by another task");
> err = -EBUSY;
> goto put_socket;
> }
>
> nsock = kzalloc_obj(*nsock);
> if (!nsock) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto put_socket;
> }
>
> socks = krealloc(config->socks, (config->num_connections + 1) *
> sizeof(struct nbd_sock *), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!socks) {
> kfree(nsock);
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto put_socket;
> }
>
> + nbd_reclassify_socket(sock);
>
> config->socks = socks;
>
> nsock->fallback_index = -1;
> nsock->dead = false;
> mutex_init(&nsock->tx_lock);
> nsock->sock = sock;
> nsock->pending = NULL;
> nsock->sent = 0;
> nsock->cookie = 0;
> INIT_WORK(&nsock->work, nbd_pending_cmd_work);
> socks[config->num_connections++] = nsock;
> atomic_inc(&config->live_connections);
>
> return 0;
>
> put_socket:
> sockfd_put(sock);
> return err;
> }
> ```
>
> I don't know if this is a really good thing once that until this be executed
> the user space can got a generic lock (the same generic lock of sock here)
> before nbd_reclassify_socket() call leading to the same problem.
> Thoughts?
>
I back to read the nbd_genl_reconnect_sock_cb(), and now I understand what you say.
YES, nbd_get_socket() also runs for sockets that are never installed. When
nbd_genl_reconnect_sock_cb() finds no dead connection it does:
```
sockfd_put(sock);
kfree(args);
return 1;
```
So the add line inside nbd_add_socket() that I sended previous don't make
sense.
What do you think now? We will call nbd_reclassify_socket() inside
nbd_get_socket() and call this only one time? Or is a better way call the
nbd_reclassify_socket() inside nbd_genl_reconnect_sock_cb() when we have sure
that we will use the socket?
thanks,
guilherme
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 21:57 Guilherme Giacomo Simoes
2026-11-11 0:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-11 10:19 ` Guilherme Giacomo Simoes
2026-11-11 11:29 ` Timo Joannin
2026-11-11 12:25 ` Guilherme Giacomo Simoes
2026-11-11 11:38 ` Guilherme Giacomo Simoes
2026-11-11 12:24 ` Guilherme Giacomo Simoes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261111122426.225742-1-trintaeoitogc@gmail.com \
--to=trintaeoitogc@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=syzbot+d7d72f3d467710442af0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®