* [PATCH net] netconsole: harden the enablement through configfs.
@ 2026-11-12 14:04 Breno Leitao
2026-11-12 15:35 ` Gustavo Luiz Duarte
2026-11-12 15:45 ` Breno Leitao
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Breno Leitao @ 2026-11-12 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo Luiz Duarte, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, kernel-team, Breno Leitao
There is a possible race when enabling/disabling the target through
configfs with netdev events that can call a null pointer dereference.
My robot was able to come up with a reproducer by adding a bunch of
msleeps() around.
The race is basically this one:
CPU 0 (enabled_store) CPU 1 (netconsole_netdev_event)
current_enabled = true
nt->state = STATE_DEACTIVATED
do_netpoll_cleanup()
np->dev = NULL
nt->state = STATE_DISABLED
list_move(&nt->list, &target_cleanup_list)
do_netpoll_cleanup()
__netpoll_cleanup(): np->dev->npinfo
And kasan reports:
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000108-0x000000000000010f]
RIP: 0010:__netpoll_cleanup
Call Trace:
do_netpoll_cleanup
netconsole_process_cleanups_core
enabled_store
configfs_write_iter
The disable path used to call netpoll_cleanup(), which skips a netpoll
without a device, until it started deferring the release to
target_cleanup_list.
Re-check the state under target_list_lock, which the notifier holds when
it stops a target, and queue the target only if it is still enabled.
Mark it disabled either way, as before.
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Fixes: 97714695ef90 ("net: netconsole: Defer netpoll cleanup to avoid lock release during list traversal")
---
Given this is not super critical or hardly faced in production, I am
sending this to net-next, even with a 'Fixes:' tag.
---
drivers/net/netconsole.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
index a9f9477da1ec77..4b546194f7179c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
@@ -1143,11 +1143,10 @@ static ssize_t enabled_store(struct config_item *item,
*/
mutex_lock(&target_cleanup_list_lock);
spin_lock_irqsave(&target_list_lock, flags);
+ /* An interface event may have stopped and released it */
+ if (nt->state == STATE_ENABLED)
+ list_move(&nt->list, &target_cleanup_list);
nt->state = STATE_DISABLED;
- /* Remove the target from the list, while holding
- * target_list_lock
- */
- list_move(&nt->list, &target_cleanup_list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&target_list_lock, flags);
mutex_unlock(&target_cleanup_list_lock);
netconsole_unregister_console(nt);
---
base-commit: c88fd6989aea9237a60a4859139a265bfb7ddc0b
base-tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git main
change-id: 20261112-netcons_double_cleanup-43b00118c1c9
Best regards,
--
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] netconsole: harden the enablement through configfs.
2026-11-12 14:04 [PATCH net] netconsole: harden the enablement through configfs Breno Leitao
@ 2026-11-12 15:35 ` Gustavo Luiz Duarte
2026-11-12 15:45 ` Breno Leitao
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo Luiz Duarte @ 2026-11-12 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Breno Leitao
Cc: Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, netdev, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On Thu, Nov 12, 2026 at 2:05 PM Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> wrote:
>
> There is a possible race when enabling/disabling the target through
> configfs with netdev events that can call a null pointer dereference.
>
> My robot was able to come up with a reproducer by adding a bunch of
> msleeps() around.
>
> The race is basically this one:
>
> CPU 0 (enabled_store) CPU 1 (netconsole_netdev_event)
> current_enabled = true
> nt->state = STATE_DEACTIVATED
> do_netpoll_cleanup()
> np->dev = NULL
> nt->state = STATE_DISABLED
> list_move(&nt->list, &target_cleanup_list)
> do_netpoll_cleanup()
> __netpoll_cleanup(): np->dev->npinfo
>
> And kasan reports:
>
> KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000108-0x000000000000010f]
> RIP: 0010:__netpoll_cleanup
> Call Trace:
> do_netpoll_cleanup
> netconsole_process_cleanups_core
> enabled_store
> configfs_write_iter
>
> The disable path used to call netpoll_cleanup(), which skips a netpoll
> without a device, until it started deferring the release to
> target_cleanup_list.
>
> Re-check the state under target_list_lock, which the notifier holds when
> it stops a target, and queue the target only if it is still enabled.
> Mark it disabled either way, as before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Good catch!
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gustavold@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] netconsole: harden the enablement through configfs.
2026-11-12 14:04 [PATCH net] netconsole: harden the enablement through configfs Breno Leitao
2026-11-12 15:35 ` Gustavo Luiz Duarte
@ 2026-11-12 15:45 ` Breno Leitao
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Breno Leitao @ 2026-11-12 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo Luiz Duarte, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On Thu, Nov 12, 2026 at 06:04:58AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> ---
> Given this is not super critical or hardly faced in production, I am
> sending this to net-next, even with a 'Fixes:' tag.
My tag ended up being 'net' instead of 'net-next', sorry. This patch was
made on net-next, and that is where we should have apply, ignoring the
`net` tag.
--breno
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-12 15:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-12 14:04 [PATCH net] netconsole: harden the enablement through configfs Breno Leitao
2026-11-12 15:35 ` Gustavo Luiz Duarte
2026-11-12 15:45 ` Breno Leitao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®