* [PATCH v2] tracing/hwlat: Do the latency calculations in nanoseconds
@ 2026-11-12 12:15 Wenwu Hou
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Wenwu Hou @ 2026-11-12 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers, linux-trace-kernel,
linux-kernel, Wenwu Hou
tr->max_latency is expected to hold nanoseconds: tracing_max_lat_read()
converts it with nsecs_to_usecs() to print the usecs documented in
hwlat_detector.rst, and the other latency tracers store nanoseconds there
too.
Do all the latency calculations in nanoseconds instead, and only convert
the durations to microseconds when recording the hwlat event.
Fixes: e7c15cd8a1133 ("tracing: Added hardware latency tracer")
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenwu Hou <hwenwur@gmail.com>
---
Tested in a 4-vCPU KVM guest; all three hwlat modes worked as expected.
Changes in v2:
- Perform the latency calculations in nanoseconds instead of converting
only the maximum latency, as suggested by Steven Rostedt.
- Convert the durations to microseconds only when recording the hwlat event
to preserve the existing event format.
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
index 65e184d800ff1..a16905ac12b0d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
@@ -203,14 +203,12 @@ static int get_sample(void)
time_type start, t1, t2, last_t2;
s64 diff, outer_diff, total, last_total = 0;
u64 sample = 0;
- u64 sample_width = READ_ONCE(hwlat_data.sample_width);
+ u64 sample_width = READ_ONCE(hwlat_data.sample_width) * NSEC_PER_USEC;
u64 thresh = tracing_thresh;
u64 outer_sample = 0;
int ret = -1;
unsigned int count = 0;
- do_div(thresh, NSEC_PER_USEC); /* modifies interval value */
-
kdata->nmi_total_ts = 0;
kdata->nmi_count = 0;
/* Make sure NMIs see this first */
@@ -229,7 +227,7 @@ static int get_sample(void)
if (time_u64(last_t2)) {
/* Check the delta from outer loop (t2 to next t1) */
- outer_diff = time_to_us(time_sub(t1, last_t2));
+ outer_diff = time_sub(t1, last_t2);
/* This shouldn't happen */
if (outer_diff < 0) {
hwlat_err(BANNER "time running backwards\n");
@@ -240,7 +238,7 @@ static int get_sample(void)
}
last_t2 = t2;
- total = time_to_us(time_sub(t2, start)); /* sample width */
+ total = time_sub(t2, start); /* sample width */
/* Check for possible overflows */
if (total < last_total) {
@@ -250,7 +248,7 @@ static int get_sample(void)
last_total = total;
/* This checks the inner loop (t1 to t2) */
- diff = time_to_us(time_sub(t2, t1)); /* current diff */
+ diff = time_sub(t2, t1); /* current diff */
if (diff > thresh || outer_diff > thresh) {
if (!count)
@@ -286,8 +284,8 @@ static int get_sample(void)
do_div(kdata->nmi_total_ts, NSEC_PER_USEC);
s.seqnum = atomic64_inc_return(&hwlat_data.count);
- s.duration = sample;
- s.outer_duration = outer_sample;
+ s.duration = time_to_us(sample);
+ s.outer_duration = time_to_us(outer_sample);
s.nmi_total_ts = kdata->nmi_total_ts;
s.nmi_count = kdata->nmi_count;
s.count = count;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-11-12 12:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-12 12:15 [PATCH v2] tracing/hwlat: Do the latency calculations in nanoseconds Wenwu Hou
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®