* [PATCH v2] iio: pressure: dps310: don't wait for new temperature in trigger handler
@ 2026-11-13 23:02 Rupesh Majhi
2026-11-14 1:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rupesh Majhi @ 2026-11-13 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko, David Lechner, Eddie James, Jonathan Cameron,
Nuno Sá,
Rupesh Majhi
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, linux-iio, linux-kernel, Sashiko, Arnav Kapoor
Each scan waits for a new temperature result before reading pressure.
With pressure sampled faster than temperature, scans then come at the
temperature rate: an 8 Hz trigger with temperature at its default 1 Hz
gives one scan a second.
Read pressure first and take the latest temperature, as a direct
pressure read already does. Wait for temperature only when pressure is
not in the scan. Read a temperature in probe, so there is a latest one
from the first scan on.
Fixes: 9b7cad9ce2ed ("iio: pressure: dps310: add triggered buffer support")
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110154254.39092-1-zoone.rupert%40gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Rupesh Majhi <zoone.rupert@gmail.com>
---
v2: read a temperature in probe, so the first scans have one (Arnav Kapoor)
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20261111195118.36853-1-zoone.rupert@gmail.com/
Cc: Arnav Kapoor <kapoorarnav43@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
index 85df58ac1809..3d05540f95dd 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
@@ -910,10 +910,18 @@ static int dps310_fill_channels(struct dps310_data *data,
unsigned int i;
int rc;
- /* Compensation needs a temperature, so it is sampled either way */
- rc = dps310_read_temp_raw_locked(data);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
+ if (test_bit(DPS310_SCAN_PRESSURE, scan_mask)) {
+ rc = dps310_read_pres_raw_locked(data);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ /* Waiting here would hold scans to the temperature rate */
+ dps310_refresh_temp_locked(data);
+ } else {
+ rc = dps310_read_temp_raw_locked(data);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ }
i = 0;
if (test_bit(DPS310_SCAN_TEMP, scan_mask)) {
@@ -924,10 +932,6 @@ static int dps310_fill_channels(struct dps310_data *data,
}
if (test_bit(DPS310_SCAN_PRESSURE, scan_mask)) {
- rc = dps310_read_pres_raw_locked(data);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
-
/* Pascals, see the channel definition */
rc = dps310_calculate_pressure(data, &channels[i++]);
if (rc)
@@ -1017,6 +1021,12 @@ static int dps310_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
if (rc)
return rc;
+ /* Pressure compensation needs a temperature from the start */
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &data->lock)
+ rc = dps310_read_temp_raw_locked(data);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
/*
* The device measures continuously in background mode, so a capture is
* just a read of the latest results. The trigger is not aligned with
base-commit: 9752760146e642f3e4a2ec860f8767fa72030d2c
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] iio: pressure: dps310: don't wait for new temperature in trigger handler
2026-11-13 23:02 [PATCH v2] iio: pressure: dps310: don't wait for new temperature in trigger handler Rupesh Majhi
@ 2026-11-14 1:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-11-14 8:35 ` Rupesh Majhi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2026-11-14 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rupesh Majhi
Cc: Andy Shevchenko, David Lechner, Eddie James, Nuno Sá,
Jonathan Cameron, linux-iio, linux-kernel, Sashiko, Arnav Kapoor
On Sat, 14 Nov 2026 01:02:41 +0200
Rupesh Majhi <zoone.rupert@gmail.com> wrote:
> Each scan waits for a new temperature result before reading pressure.
> With pressure sampled faster than temperature, scans then come at the
> temperature rate: an 8 Hz trigger with temperature at its default 1 Hz
> gives one scan a second.
>
> Read pressure first and take the latest temperature, as a direct
> pressure read already does. Wait for temperature only when pressure is
> not in the scan. Read a temperature in probe, so there is a latest one
> from the first scan on.
That was potentially a while back. Why not do it in preenable for the buffer?
Will make the buffer start a bit slow but should 'work' from there on.
>
> Fixes: 9b7cad9ce2ed ("iio: pressure: dps310: add triggered buffer support")
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110154254.39092-1-zoone.rupert%40gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Rupesh Majhi <zoone.rupert@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: read a temperature in probe, so the first scans have one (Arnav Kapoor)
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20261111195118.36853-1-zoone.rupert@gmail.com/
>
> Cc: Arnav Kapoor <kapoorarnav43@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
> index 85df58ac1809..3d05540f95dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
> @@ -910,10 +910,18 @@ static int dps310_fill_channels(struct dps310_data *data,
> unsigned int i;
> int rc;
>
> - /* Compensation needs a temperature, so it is sampled either way */
> - rc = dps310_read_temp_raw_locked(data);
> - if (rc)
> - return rc;
> + if (test_bit(DPS310_SCAN_PRESSURE, scan_mask)) {
> + rc = dps310_read_pres_raw_locked(data);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + /* Waiting here would hold scans to the temperature rate */
> + dps310_refresh_temp_locked(data);
> + } else {
> + rc = dps310_read_temp_raw_locked(data);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> + }
>
> i = 0;
> if (test_bit(DPS310_SCAN_TEMP, scan_mask)) {
> @@ -924,10 +932,6 @@ static int dps310_fill_channels(struct dps310_data *data,
> }
>
> if (test_bit(DPS310_SCAN_PRESSURE, scan_mask)) {
> - rc = dps310_read_pres_raw_locked(data);
> - if (rc)
> - return rc;
> -
> /* Pascals, see the channel definition */
> rc = dps310_calculate_pressure(data, &channels[i++]);
> if (rc)
> @@ -1017,6 +1021,12 @@ static int dps310_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> + /* Pressure compensation needs a temperature from the start */
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &data->lock)
> + rc = dps310_read_temp_raw_locked(data);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> /*
> * The device measures continuously in background mode, so a capture is
> * just a read of the latest results. The trigger is not aligned with
>
> base-commit: 9752760146e642f3e4a2ec860f8767fa72030d2c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] iio: pressure: dps310: don't wait for new temperature in trigger handler
2026-11-14 1:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
@ 2026-11-14 8:35 ` Rupesh Majhi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rupesh Majhi @ 2026-11-14 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jic23
Cc: Andy Shevchenko, David Lechner, Eddie James, Nuno Sá,
Jonathan Cameron, linux-iio, linux-kernel, Sashiko, Arnav Kapoor
On Sat, 14 Nov 2026 01:38:17 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Read pressure first and take the latest temperature, as a direct
> > pressure read already does. Wait for temperature only when pressure is
> > not in the scan. Read a temperature in probe, so there is a latest one
> > from the first scan on.
>
> That was potentially a while back. Why not do it in preenable for the buffer?
> Will make the buffer start a bit slow but should 'work' from there on.
Probe value only lasts until the next temperature result. By the
time the buffer starts TMP_RDY is set, so first scan takes a new
temperature anyway (checked on the board, buffer enabled 5 s after
probe). The probe read also covers direct pressure reads.
Happy to move it to preenable if you prefer.
Thanks,
Rupesh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-14 8:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-13 23:02 [PATCH v2] iio: pressure: dps310: don't wait for new temperature in trigger handler Rupesh Majhi
2026-11-14 1:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-11-14 8:35 ` Rupesh Majhi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®