mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Harry Yoo (Meta)" <harry@kernel.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	 Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
	 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,  Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	 Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH for-next v3 3/7] mm/slab: handle SLAB_FREE_NOLOCK in slab_free_hook() instead of open coding
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 15:09:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261115-kmalloc-nolock-fixes-v3-3-9034dd4ecaab@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261115-kmalloc-nolock-fixes-v3-0-9034dd4ecaab@kernel.org>

kfree_nolock() deliberately skips slab free hooks that should not be
called in unknown context. However, there is one more place that
needs the same thing: memcg_alloc_abort_single().

Instead of open coding slab_free_hook(), let it handle
SLAB_FREE_NOLOCK. This is required to correctly handle allocation
failures due to memcg charging.

kfree_nolock() now respects init_on_free which has been ignored.
Besides that, no functional change intended.

Fixes: af92793e52c3 ("slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock().")
Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo (Meta) <harry@kernel.org>
---
 mm/slub.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 761dc2affea2..7c0adc104988 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2684,11 +2684,14 @@ struct rcu_delayed_free {
  * - memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook()
  * - alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook()
  *
+ * slab_free_hook() assumes that memcg_slab_free_hook() and
+ * alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook() are already invoked.
+ *
  * Free hooks that must handle missing corresponding alloc hooks:
  * - kmemleak_free_recursive()
  * - kfence_free()
  *
- * Free hooks that have no alloc hook counterpart, and thus safe to call:
+ * Free hooks that have no alloc hook counterpart:
  * - debug_check_no_locks_freed()
  * - debug_check_no_obj_freed()
  * - __kcsan_check_access()
@@ -2698,28 +2701,39 @@ bool slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x, unsigned int free_flags)
 {
 	bool init = free_flags & SLAB_FREE_INIT;
 	bool after_rcu_delay = free_flags & SLAB_FREE_AFTER_RCU_DELAY;
+	bool allow_spin = free_flags_allow_spinning(free_flags);
 	/* Are the object contents still accessible? */
 	bool still_accessible = (s->flags & SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU) && !after_rcu_delay;
 
-	kmemleak_free_recursive(x, s->flags);
 	kmsan_slab_free(s, x);
 
-	debug_check_no_locks_freed(x, s->object_size);
+	/* Hooks that acquire locks or kmalloc_nolock() skips alloc hook counterpart */
+	if (likely(allow_spin)) {
+		kmemleak_free_recursive(x, s->flags);
+		debug_check_no_locks_freed(x, s->object_size);
 
-	if (!(s->flags & SLAB_DEBUG_OBJECTS))
-		debug_check_no_obj_freed(x, s->object_size);
+		if (!(s->flags & SLAB_DEBUG_OBJECTS))
+			debug_check_no_obj_freed(x, s->object_size);
 
-	/* Use KCSAN to help debug racy use-after-free. */
-	if (!still_accessible)
-		__kcsan_check_access(x, s->object_size,
-				     KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE | KCSAN_ACCESS_ASSERT);
+		/* Use KCSAN to help debug racy use-after-free. */
+		if (!still_accessible)
+			__kcsan_check_access(x, s->object_size,
+					     KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE | KCSAN_ACCESS_ASSERT);
 
-	if (kfence_free(x))
-		return false;
+		if (kfence_free(x))
+			return false;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Give KASAN a chance to notice an invalid free operation before we
 	 * modify the object.
+	 *
+	 * If KASAN finds a bug it will do kasan_report_invalid_free() which
+	 * will call raw_spin_lock_irqsave() which is technically unsafe from
+	 * NMI, but take chance and report kernel bug. The sequence of
+	 * kasan_report_invalid_free() -> raw_spin_lock_irqsave() -> NMI
+	 * -> kfree_nolock() -> kasan_report_invalid_free() on the same CPU
+	 *  is double buggy and deserves to deadlock.
 	 */
 	if (kasan_slab_pre_free(s, x))
 		return false;
@@ -2728,6 +2742,7 @@ bool slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x, unsigned int free_flags)
 	if (still_accessible) {
 		struct rcu_delayed_free *delayed_free;
 
+		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!allow_spin);
 		delayed_free = kmalloc_obj(*delayed_free, GFP_NOWAIT);
 		if (delayed_free) {
 			/*
@@ -2775,8 +2790,11 @@ bool slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x, unsigned int free_flags)
 		set_orig_size(s, x, orig_size);
 
 	}
-	/* KASAN might put x into memory quarantine, delaying its reuse. */
-	return !kasan_slab_free(s, x, init, still_accessible, false);
+	/*
+	 * KASAN might put x into memory quarantine, delaying its reuse.
+	 * Skip quarantine when spinning is not allowed as it uses a spinlock.
+	 */
+	return !kasan_slab_free(s, x, init, still_accessible, !allow_spin);
 }
 
 static __fastpath_inline
@@ -6935,6 +6953,7 @@ void kfree_nolock(const void *object)
 	struct slab *slab;
 	struct kmem_cache *s;
 	void *x = (void *)object;
+	unsigned int free_flags = SLAB_FREE_NOLOCK;
 
 	if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(object)))
 		return;
@@ -6949,33 +6968,12 @@ void kfree_nolock(const void *object)
 
 	memcg_slab_free_hook(s, slab, &x, 1);
 	alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook(s, slab, &x, 1);
-	/*
-	 * Unlike slab_free() do NOT call the following:
-	 * kmemleak_free_recursive(x, s->flags);
-	 * debug_check_no_locks_freed(x, s->object_size);
-	 * debug_check_no_obj_freed(x, s->object_size);
-	 * __kcsan_check_access(x, s->object_size, ..);
-	 * kfence_free(x);
-	 * since they take spinlocks or not safe from any context.
-	 */
-	kmsan_slab_free(s, x);
-	/*
-	 * If KASAN finds a kernel bug it will do kasan_report_invalid_free()
-	 * which will call raw_spin_lock_irqsave() which is technically
-	 * unsafe from NMI, but take chance and report kernel bug.
-	 * The sequence of
-	 * kasan_report_invalid_free() -> raw_spin_lock_irqsave() -> NMI
-	 *  -> kfree_nolock() -> kasan_report_invalid_free() on the same CPU
-	 * is double buggy and deserves to deadlock.
-	 */
-	if (kasan_slab_pre_free(s, x))
+
+	if (slab_want_init_on_free(s))
+		free_flags |= SLAB_FREE_INIT;
+
+	if (unlikely(!slab_free_hook(s, x, free_flags)))
 		return;
-	/*
-	 * memcg, kasan_slab_pre_free are done for 'x'.
-	 * The only thing left is kasan_poison without quarantine,
-	 * since kasan quarantine takes locks and not supported from NMI.
-	 */
-	kasan_slab_free(s, x, false, false, /* skip quarantine */true);
 
 	if (likely(can_free_to_pcs(slab)) && likely(free_to_pcs(s, x, false)))
 		return;

-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-15 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-15 15:09 [PATCH for-next v3 0/7] memcg,slab: kmalloc_nolock() fixes Harry Yoo (Meta)
2026-11-15 15:09 ` [PATCH for-next v3 1/7] mm/memcontrol: defer obj_cgroup_release() to irq_work Harry Yoo (Meta)
2026-11-15 15:09 ` [PATCH for-next v3 2/7] mm/slab: pass free_flags to slab_free_hook() Harry Yoo (Meta)
2026-11-15 15:09 ` Harry Yoo (Meta) [this message]
2026-11-15 15:09 ` [PATCH for-next v3 4/7] mm/slab: fix a deadlock in memcg_alloc_abort_single() Harry Yoo (Meta)
2026-11-15 15:09 ` [PATCH for-next v3 5/7] mm/slab: serialize deferred_work_barrier() Harry Yoo (Meta)
2026-11-15 15:09 ` [PATCH for-next v3 6/7] mm/slab: refactor free_to_pcs() Harry Yoo (Meta)
2026-11-15 15:09 ` [PATCH for-next v3 7/7] mm/slab: call debug_locks and KCSAN checks in kfree_nolock() Harry Yoo (Meta)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261115-kmalloc-nolock-fixes-v3-3-9034dd4ecaab@kernel.org \
    --to=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®