mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ju Nan <junan76@163.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: antonio.borneo@foss.st.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
	alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	clrkwllms@kernel.org, lee@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, mfd@lists.linux.dev,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] pinctrl: stm32: fix hwspinlock timeout and EXTI mux locking
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 20:42:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202f3cb0-a599-44e4-8048-8cbe22b9eaa2@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD++jLk9Rga0OuaKyojE2ViT9cBcmD_Ow-pMth-qJbTfHgcybA@mail.gmail.com>



On 10/16/26 9:19 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi Ju,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 6:10 PM Ju Nan <junan76@163.com> wrote:
> 
>> This series fixes two problems around the hwspinlock-protected EXTI mux
>> and pin configuration accesses in the STM32 pinctrl driver.
> 
> Patches applied for v7.4.
> 
> There are still complaints from Sashiko, but Sashiko always
> complains so I'd say at this point we are close to the merge
> window so it is better to follow up with separate fixes
> if there are more issues.
> 

Thank you for applying the series.

Many thanks also to Antonio and Sebastian for taking the time to
review the patches; your feedback helped improve the series a lot.

> As maintainer I kind of have to decide whether to wait for
> the perfect patch or if perfect is the enemy of good and
> just merge the patch so the baseline looks better, so I
> decided for the latter here.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

I've looked through the remaining Sashiko comments. I'll keep an
eye on it and send fixes if anything comes up.

Yours,
Ju Nan


      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-18 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14 16:09 Ju Nan
2026-10-14 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] pinctrl: stm32: Fix the unit of the hwspinlock timeout Ju Nan
2026-10-14 16:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: stm32: program the EXTI mux from .alloc instead of .activate Ju Nan
2026-10-16 13:19 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] pinctrl: stm32: fix hwspinlock timeout and EXTI mux locking Linus Walleij
2026-10-18 12:42   ` Ju Nan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202f3cb0-a599-44e4-8048-8cbe22b9eaa2@163.com \
    --to=junan76@163.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=antonio.borneo@foss.st.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=mfd@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®