mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP?
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 02:39:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20628091.X3uHbXY5oF@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160506002519.GB14673@sky.smuckle.net>

On Thursday, May 05, 2016 05:25:19 PM Steve Muckle wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:09:07AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > In turn, schedutil should probably depend on CONFIG_SMP.
> 
> In the long term I wonder if it's worth putting PELT under its own
> separate feature or just removing #ifdef CONFIG_SMP.
> 
> Aside from task migration CPU frequency updates there's also task
> creation and deletion which would apply on UP. The tunable
> infrastructure being created for scheduler-guided frequency may be of
> interest on UP also.

I agree, but I was talking short-term. :-)

We need to fix this for 4.6 (which most likely is 2 weeks away only) and
I don't think it hurts anyone if schedutil depends on CONFIG_SMP to start
with.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-06  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-05 23:49 Steve Muckle
2016-05-06  0:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-06  0:25   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-06 11:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-06 11:49       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-06  0:25   ` Steve Muckle
2016-05-06  0:39     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-05-06 11:49     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20628091.X3uHbXY5oF@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®