From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
David Vrabel <dvrabel@cantab.net>,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] xen: features and fixes for 4.8-rc0
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 01:46:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2152986.NBIGJLcTzZ@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxHGYMUMR3vzYA6=-dH2dORoRWGn2YJQoADO2JM3+MNPw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 04:18:32 PM Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> >
> > The STAO definition document:
> >
> > http://wiki.xenproject.org/mediawiki/images/0/02/Status-override-table.pdf
> >
> > requires as to "operate as if that device does not exist", quite literally.
>
> Well, first off, documentation is one thing, actually changing
> behavior is something entirely different.
>
> Theory and practice are *not* the same.
Well, the STAO thing is totally new, so we have the documentation only ATM.
> The other worry I have is that I'd be happier if it's still visible in
> /sys/bus/acpi/ etc. Again, it's one thing to not react to it
> programmatically, and another thing entirely to actually hide the
> information from the rest of the system.
>
> If I read that patch right, it will be hidden from sysfs too. But
> Maybe I'm mistaken.
You're right.
Avoiding to enumerate it entirely is somewhat simpler, because it allows
us to avoid some special casing in a few places IIRC.
I guess we can ask the author of the commit in question to come up with a
patch to unhide that device and we'll see how that looks like.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-27 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-27 13:45 David Vrabel
2016-07-27 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-07-27 18:57 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper
2016-07-27 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-27 23:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-07-27 23:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-07-28 0:03 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2152986.NBIGJLcTzZ@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=dvrabel@cantab.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=shannon.zhao@linaro.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®