From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
bart.vanassche@sandisk.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] scsi: scsi_dh_alua: allow I/O in target port unavailable and standby states
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:32:15 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <224d8cd3-478c-2440-3479-0119885575cf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6e97d03-0e1b-df2a-70e2-3247833f3aac@suse.de>
On 07/11/2017 06:18 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> NACK.
>
> The whole_point_ of having device handlers is to_avoid_ I/O errors
> during booting.
>
> And the ALUA checker is prepared to handle this situation properly.
> The directio checker of course doesn't know about this, but then no-one
> expected the directio checker to work with ALUA.
I lacked that more holistic understanding. Thanks for explaining.
Now, for the sake of logging/debugging...
Any problem with patches 2 and 4?
Also, it seems the Unavailable/Standby states would not be logged
without a recheck from alua_check_sense(), since the only callers
of alua_rtpg_queue() are alua_activate() and alua_check[_sense]()
[the call from alua_check_vpd() is only in the initialization path].
Isn't there a point in scheduling a recheck once those conditions
are found in alua_check_sense() to get them logged? - since valid
path checkers won't go through that function.
(and it occurred to me that the state-change check of patch 3 can
be done there, simpler.)
cheers,
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-11 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-10 22:47 [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi_dh_alua: fix stuck I/O after unavailable/standby states Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2017-07-10 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] scsi: scsi_dh_alua: allow I/O in target port unavailable and standby states Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2017-07-11 9:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-07-11 15:32 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira [this message]
2017-07-11 21:01 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2017-07-10 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] scsi: scsi_dh_alua: print changes to RTPG state of all PGs Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2017-07-10 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] scsi: scsi_dh_alua: do not print RTPG state if it remains unavailable/standby Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2017-07-11 14:11 ` [PATCH] scsi: scsi_dh_alua: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2017-07-11 14:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] scsi: scsi_dh_alua: do not print RTPG state if it remains unavailable/standby kbuild test robot
2017-07-10 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] scsi: scsi_dh_alua: add sdev_dbg() to track alua_rtpg_work() Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2017-07-10 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi_dh_alua: fix stuck I/O after unavailable/standby states Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=224d8cd3-478c-2440-3479-0119885575cf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®