From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] perf/arm-cmn: Ensure dtm_idx is big enough
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:00:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22b69400-af16-4e78-8f72-c10564d7cc6c@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zr8ma7pt7te0qxNG@J2N7QTR9R3>
On 16/08/2024 11:14 am, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 08:15:42PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> While CMN_MAX_DIMENSION was bumped to 12 for CMN-650, that only supports
>> up to a 10x10 mesh, so bumping dtm_idx to 256 bits at the time worked
>> out OK in practice. However CMN-700 did finally support up to 144 XPs,
>> and thus needs a worst-case 288 bits of dtm_idx for an aggregated XP
>> event on a maxed-out config. Oops.
>>
>> Fixes: 23760a014417 ("perf/arm-cmn: Add CMN-700 support")
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
>> index 0e2e12e2f4fb..c9a2b21a7aec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
>> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
>> @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static void arm_cmn_debugfs_init(struct arm_cmn *cmn, int id) {}
>>
>> struct arm_cmn_hw_event {
>> struct arm_cmn_node *dn;
>> - u64 dtm_idx[4];
>> + u64 dtm_idx[5];
>
> Can't we size this based on CMN_MAX_DIMENSION (or CMN_MAX_XPS or
> CMN_MAX_DTMS), to make that clear?
Fair enough, I did go back and forth a little on that idea, but reached
the opposite conclusion that documenting this with the assert to
deliberately make it *not* look straightforward was nicer than wrestling
with an accurate name for the logical quantity here, which strictly
would be something like CMN_MAX_NODES_PER_TYPE_WE_CARE_ABOUT (there can
already be up to 256 RN-Fs, but those aren't visible to the PMU).
I'll have another think on that approach - I do concur that the assert
isn't *functionally* any better than automatically sizing the array.
Thanks,
Robin.
> From the desciription in the commit message it sounds like you need 2 *
> CMN_MAX_XPS bits, i.e.
>
> #define DTM_IDX_BITS (2 * CMN_MAX_XPS)
>
> u64 dtm_idx[DIV_ROUND_UP(DTM_IDX_BITS, 64)];
>
> Mark.
>
>> s8 dtc_idx[CMN_MAX_DTCS];
>> u8 num_dns;
>> u8 dtm_offset;
>> --
>> 2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-19 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-09 19:15 [PATCH 0/8] perf/arm-cmn: Fixes and updates Robin Murphy
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf/arm-cmn: Refactor node ID handling. Again Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 9:33 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-16 11:56 ` Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 12:45 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-16 13:21 ` Robin Murphy
2024-08-24 1:00 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2024-08-27 13:51 ` Robin Murphy
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf/arm-cmn: Fix CCLA register offset Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 10:00 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-16 18:33 ` Robin Murphy
2024-08-23 23:18 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf/arm-cmn: Ensure dtm_idx is big enough Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 10:14 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-19 15:00 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2024-08-20 9:27 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-23 23:58 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf/arm-cmn: Improve build-time assertions Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 10:20 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf/arm-cmn: Make cycle counts less surprising Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 10:25 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-19 16:35 ` Robin Murphy
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf/arm-cmn: Refactor DTC PMU register access Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 10:29 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-19 16:41 ` Robin Murphy
2024-08-20 9:23 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-23 23:46 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 7/8] dt-bindings: perf: arm-cmn: Add CMN S3 Robin Murphy
2024-08-15 15:20 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf/arm-cmn: Support " Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 10:32 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-23 23:38 ` Ilkka Koskinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22b69400-af16-4e78-8f72-c10564d7cc6c@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®