mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@huawei.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<louhongxiang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: core: cleanup scsi_dev_queue_ready()
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2023 15:49:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <236310e2-b253-553e-d210-4a4928ed8ec8@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a11374c-4e8e-b7f9-aca4-55686a6ec501@huawei.com>

On 2023/9/24 14:27, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> On 2023/9/22 20:50, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 2023/09/22 2:38, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>>> This is just a cleanup for scsi_dev_queue_ready() to avoid
>>> redundant goto and if statement, it did not change the origin
>>> logic.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>>> index ca5eb058d5c7..f3e388127dbd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>>> @@ -1254,28 +1254,29 @@ static inline int scsi_dev_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
>>>       int token;
>>>       token = sbitmap_get(&sdev->budget_map);
>>> -    if (atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked)) {
>>> -        if (token < 0)
>>> -            goto out;
>>> +    if (token < 0)
>>> +        return -1;
>>
>> This is changing how this function works...
>>
> 
> I don't think so...
> The origin function flow:
> 
> static inline int scsi_dev_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
>                    struct scsi_device *sdev)
> {
>      ...
>      token = sbitmap_get(&sdev->budget_map);
>      if (atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked)) {
>          if (token < 0)
>              goto out;
>      }
>      return token;
> out:
>      return -1
> }
> 
> If the token is less than 0, it would always return -1. So we can found
> it's not necessary to check token after atomic_read().
> 
>>> -        if (scsi_device_busy(sdev) > 1)
>>> -            goto out_dec;
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * device_blocked is not set at mostly time, so check it first
>>> +     * and return token when it is not set.
>>> +     */
>>> +    if (!atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked))
>>> +        return token;
>>
>> ...because you reversed the tests order.
> 
> As explained in comment, the device_blocked is not set at mostly time,
> so when it's not set, just return the token.
> 
>>> -        /*
>>> -         * unblock after device_blocked iterates to zero
>>> -         */
>>> -        if (atomic_dec_return(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0)
>>> -            goto out_dec;
>>> -        SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
>>> -                   "unblocking device at zero depth\n"));
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * unblock after device_blocked iterates to zero
>>> +     */
>>> +    if (scsi_device_busy(sdev) > 1 ||
>>> +        atomic_dec_return(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0) {
>>
>> And here too, you are changing how the function works. The atomic_dec may not be
>> done if the first condition is true.
>>
> 
> the origin flow would not call atomic_dec_return() too when condition
> "scsi_device_busy(sdev) > 1" is true like following:
> 
> static inline int scsi_dev_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
>                    struct scsi_device *sdev)
> {
>      ...
>      if (atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked)) {
>          if (scsi_device_busy(sdev) > 1)
>              goto out_dec;
> 
>          /*
>           * unblock after device_blocked iterates to zero
>           */
>          if (atomic_dec_return(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0)
>              goto out_dec;
>          SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
>                     "unblocking device at zero depth\n"));
>      }
>      return token;
> out_dec:
>      if (token >= 0)
>          sbitmap_put(&sdev->budget_map, token);
> out:
>      return -1;
> }
> 
> Here is the function before and after my change:
> 
> The old function:
> static inline int scsi_dev_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
>                    struct scsi_device *sdev)
> {
>      int token;
> 
>      token = sbitmap_get(&sdev->budget_map);
>      if (token < 0)
>          return -1;
> 
>      /*
>       * device_blocked is not set at mostly time, so check it first
>       * and return token when it is not set.
>       */
>      if (!atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked))
>          return token;
> 
>      /*
>       * unblock after device_blocked iterates to zero
>       */
>      if (scsi_device_busy(sdev) > 1 ||
>          atomic_dec_return(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0) {
>          sbitmap_put(&sdev->budget_map, token);
>          return -1;
>      }
> 
>      SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
>               "unblocking device at zero depth\n"));
> 
>      return token;
> }
> 

Sorry, I paste wrong for old function, the old function is:

static inline int scsi_dev_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
				  struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
	int token;

	token = sbitmap_get(&sdev->budget_map);
	if (atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked)) {
		if (token < 0)
			goto out;

		if (scsi_device_busy(sdev) > 1)
			goto out_dec;

		/*
		 * unblock after device_blocked iterates to zero
		 */
		if (atomic_dec_return(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0)
			goto out_dec;
		SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
				   "unblocking device at zero depth\n"));
	}

	return token;
out_dec:
	if (token >= 0)
		sbitmap_put(&sdev->budget_map, token);
out:
	return -1;
}


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-24  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-22  9:38 [PATCH 0/2] cleanup patch Wenchao Hao
2023-09-22  9:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: core: cleanup scsi_dev_queue_ready() Wenchao Hao
2023-09-22 12:50   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-09-24  6:27     ` Wenchao Hao
2023-09-24  7:49       ` Wenchao Hao [this message]
2023-10-11 12:37       ` Wenchao Hao
2023-09-22  9:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: Add comment of target_destroy in scsi_host_template Wenchao Hao
2023-09-22 14:53   ` Bart Van Assche
2023-09-24  6:29     ` Wenchao Hao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=236310e2-b253-553e-d210-4a4928ed8ec8@huawei.com \
    --to=haowenchao2@huawei.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=louhongxiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®