mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@huawei.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<louhongxiang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: core: cleanup scsi_dev_queue_ready()
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2023 14:27:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a11374c-4e8e-b7f9-aca4-55686a6ec501@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea28de69-8b9d-8ff8-b7fc-eb780123f055@kernel.org>

On 2023/9/22 20:50, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2023/09/22 2:38, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>> This is just a cleanup for scsi_dev_queue_ready() to avoid
>> redundant goto and if statement, it did not change the origin
>> logic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>> index ca5eb058d5c7..f3e388127dbd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>> @@ -1254,28 +1254,29 @@ static inline int scsi_dev_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
>>   	int token;
>>   
>>   	token = sbitmap_get(&sdev->budget_map);
>> -	if (atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked)) {
>> -		if (token < 0)
>> -			goto out;
>> +	if (token < 0)
>> +		return -1;
> 
> This is changing how this function works...
>

I don't think so...
The origin function flow:

static inline int scsi_dev_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
				  struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
	...
	token = sbitmap_get(&sdev->budget_map);
	if (atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked)) {
		if (token < 0)
			goto out;
	}
	return token;
out:
	return -1
}

If the token is less than 0, it would always return -1. So we can found
it's not necessary to check token after atomic_read().
  
>>   
>> -		if (scsi_device_busy(sdev) > 1)
>> -			goto out_dec;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * device_blocked is not set at mostly time, so check it first
>> +	 * and return token when it is not set.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked))
>> +		return token;
> 
> ...because you reversed the tests order.

As explained in comment, the device_blocked is not set at mostly time,
so when it's not set, just return the token.

>>   
>> -		/*
>> -		 * unblock after device_blocked iterates to zero
>> -		 */
>> -		if (atomic_dec_return(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0)
>> -			goto out_dec;
>> -		SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
>> -				   "unblocking device at zero depth\n"));
>> +	/*
>> +	 * unblock after device_blocked iterates to zero
>> +	 */
>> +	if (scsi_device_busy(sdev) > 1 ||
>> +	    atomic_dec_return(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0) {
> 
> And here too, you are changing how the function works. The atomic_dec may not be
> done if the first condition is true.
> 

the origin flow would not call atomic_dec_return() too when condition
"scsi_device_busy(sdev) > 1" is true like following:

static inline int scsi_dev_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
				  struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
	...
	if (atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked)) {
		if (scsi_device_busy(sdev) > 1)
			goto out_dec;

		/*
		 * unblock after device_blocked iterates to zero
		 */
		if (atomic_dec_return(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0)
			goto out_dec;
		SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
				   "unblocking device at zero depth\n"));
	}
	return token;
out_dec:
	if (token >= 0)
		sbitmap_put(&sdev->budget_map, token);
out:
	return -1;
}

Here is the function before and after my change:

The old function:
static inline int scsi_dev_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
				  struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
	int token;

	token = sbitmap_get(&sdev->budget_map);
	if (token < 0)
		return -1;

	/*
	 * device_blocked is not set at mostly time, so check it first
	 * and return token when it is not set.
	 */
	if (!atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked))
		return token;

	/*
	 * unblock after device_blocked iterates to zero
	 */
	if (scsi_device_busy(sdev) > 1 ||
	    atomic_dec_return(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0) {
		sbitmap_put(&sdev->budget_map, token);
		return -1;
	}

	SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
			 "unblocking device at zero depth\n"));

	return token;
}

Function after my change:

static inline int scsi_dev_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
				  struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
	int token;

	token = sbitmap_get(&sdev->budget_map);
	if (token < 0)
		return -1;

	/*
	 * device_blocked is not set at mostly time, so check it first
	 * and return token when it is not set.
	 */
	if (!atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked))
		return token;

	/*
	 * unblock after device_blocked iterates to zero
	 */
	if (scsi_device_busy(sdev) > 1 ||
	    atomic_dec_return(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0) {
		sbitmap_put(&sdev->budget_map, token);
		return -1;
	}

	SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
			 "unblocking device at zero depth\n"));

	return token;
}

I think it looks more clear and readable than before.


>> +		sbitmap_put(&sdev->budget_map, token);
>> +		return -1;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
>> +			 "unblocking device at zero depth\n"));
>> +
>>   	return token;
>> -out_dec:
>> -	if (token >= 0)
>> -		sbitmap_put(&sdev->budget_map, token);
>> -out:
>> -	return -1;
>>   }
>>   
>>   /*
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-24  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-22  9:38 [PATCH 0/2] cleanup patch Wenchao Hao
2023-09-22  9:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: core: cleanup scsi_dev_queue_ready() Wenchao Hao
2023-09-22 12:50   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-09-24  6:27     ` Wenchao Hao [this message]
2023-09-24  7:49       ` Wenchao Hao
2023-10-11 12:37       ` Wenchao Hao
2023-09-22  9:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: Add comment of target_destroy in scsi_host_template Wenchao Hao
2023-09-22 14:53   ` Bart Van Assche
2023-09-24  6:29     ` Wenchao Hao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7a11374c-4e8e-b7f9-aca4-55686a6ec501@huawei.com \
    --to=haowenchao2@huawei.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=louhongxiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®